Mafiascum.net

In post 2074, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk how those are town-indicative, those might just be playstyle
What do you think of my point that MM’s belief in her read on me seems a little dilapidated?

In post 2000, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1991, the worst wrote:i did indeed see those, i just kept reading (didn't register that you actually wanted a response to #2)

1) idk I'm not your brain!! i was asking you!!!!!
2) more interested in manatee doing a read on you than I am in answering this

If you were my brain I'd be wanting more than a few words with you. Why do you think I should vote you?
Oddly I'm more interested in your thoughts than in manatees.

In post 1873, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1869, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Nah, not arrogant. I just wasn't sure if you were working from the assumption that Gamma is scum.

This is kinda why I’m suspicious of MM, some of what she’s posted feels this way but other things don’t entirely line up with it and that disconnect in how I perceive her faith in her read of me feels scum-indicative.

In post 2079, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1873, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1869, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Nah, not arrogant. I just wasn't sure if you were working from the assumption that Gamma is scum.

This is kinda why I’m suspicious of MM, some of what she’s posted feels this way but other things don’t entirely line up with it and that disconnect in how I perceive her faith in her read of me feels scum-indicative.

@Titud

In post 2076, ManateeGal wrote:realization: isoing does very little to help me develop a read

In post 2080, Titus wrote:

In post 2079, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1873, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1869, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Nah, not arrogant. I just wasn't sure if you were working from the assumption that Gamma is scum.

This is kinda why I’m suspicious of MM, some of what she’s posted feels this way but other things don’t entirely line up with it and that disconnect in how I perceive her faith in her read of me feels scum-indicative.

@Titud

Rephrasing here, just to ensure I understand.

Do you feel she's starting from the position that you're scum but then falling out of it at points?

In post 2056, ManateeGal wrote:Bee vote on me i think is pretty good. The intention feels genuine and I think their desire for a new wagon reads as pretty towny in general.
Gamma's vote is ???? Im pretty sure they were already scumreading me so im not sure why they used bee starting a pressure wagon as the time to lay down a vote
the worst had a naked vote,, which makes sense and is fine with meeeeeee. not much 2 read in to here.
Thor said my iso sent shivers down his spine which is fair,,, cos same im not proud of what ive done so far.
i dont think flea really thinks my frozen-ness here is comparable to NQN (i think thats what fae is talking abt). not a fan of that vote cos i think those scenarios are pretty different.
pp naked vote is fine.

In post 2056, ManateeGal wrote:i dont think flea really thinks my frozen-ness here is comparable to NQN (i think thats what fae is talking abt). not a fan of that vote cos i think those scenarios are pretty different.

In post 2066, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2061, Titus wrote:Auro Flea Thor.

Those are the three I want. Enchant is a compromise but I worry that's a language barrier.

Not feeling these SRs rn

In post 2071, Thor Ragnarok wrote:I need to go back to the workshop and come up with an alternative strategy, I'll get to it.

In post 2078, the worst wrote:

In post 2000, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1991, the worst wrote:i did indeed see those, i just kept reading (didn't register that you actually wanted a response to #2)

1) idk I'm not your brain!! i was asking you!!!!!
2) more interested in manatee doing a read on you than I am in answering this

If you were my brain I'd be wanting more than a few words with you. Why do you think I should vote you?
Oddly I'm more interested in your thoughts than in manatees.

I dunno. I feel like people have kind of avoided talking about the idea of me being scum but I don't feel like I'm really anyone's townread. I think you mentioned scumreading me at some point, so I wondered if there was a particular reason you were working around that read.

In post 1543, Titus wrote:

In post 1473, Harvey and Haley wrote:

In post 1471, Flea The Magician wrote:A hydra is a hydra. While I can understand Xtomx is hesitant and unlikely to post they are still a player in this game. Your slot is the responsibility of both heads, and I get chewed out when I don't consider an entire hydra (even if I'm right).

Readable content should be organic, not forced. I'm not going to go through your ISO and interrogate every post because that would be pointless and forced. It would also potentially stall the game going back excessively instead of moving forward.

My slot is the responsibility of both heads - sure. Divided 99-1.

My content

is

organically readable, seemingly to everyone but you. You can't expect me to magically conjure content that you specifically find readable when I don't understand what would make it so.

Additionally, I don't know why you'd have to "interrogate me over every post" to gain readable content from me, like, can't we just engage/talk about stuff?

-Harvey

Flea and Harvey unlikely S v S.

In post 2089, Flea The Magician wrote:13 players with 9 potential roles, 8 are PRs, and 2 alignments.

I need a script for this...

In post 2092, Flea The Magician wrote:Choo Choo, lets go.