Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 am
Yo Wraith, how about you talk about something beside the Benmage subject....like the kunkstar7 or MoI subjects. What are your thoughts on those? Is there someone else you think is cult besides El Goo?
Yeah, first was the hardest to put down. I read that bastard in two sittings and missed quite a bit of sleep for it. Clash of Kings took a little longer, but I saw the end in sight and finished it around seven this morning. Time to read Storm of Swords for your theme game~Seacore wrote:Hehe, A Game of Thrones is bloody addictive. I like the later books more, but the first was probably the hardest to put down. If you read fast enough, you'll be ready for our next game.
Wicked can do one grave rob and launder. It seems to be that the townie looking people we're choosing to grave rob would be better off doing one rob and an action, while the people we're relegating to bouncing graves because they look scummy should do double. Correct me if I'm wrong.VP wrote:Yeah, AV's plan is the only true way to test that because no investigator should be bloody other than rezzers or potential murderers. We know the former and the latter aren't going to claim to be bloody. Of course, the problem is that right now Wicked is one of the best people to grave rob and therefore wouldn't have an action available to launder. We could replace him in the grave robbing with another pro-town person or put me back in there, but that is theoretically riskier for the town.
Yeah, that was one option that had occurred to me as well...only downside is spreading insanities around too much, but that's not a huge deal this early in the game. So going back to my other list we could do something like:hito wrote:Wicked can do one grave rob and launder. It seems to be that the townie looking people we're choosing to grave rob would be better off doing one rob and an action, while the people we're relegating to bouncing graves because they look scummy should do double. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I approve of this, as long as it's recognised that Benmage has stated he will not rob two graves, and that i've stated that I don't believe Benmage can be swayed by threats.VP Baltar wrote: RC = Furc, [kunkstar7, MoI, El Goo, Wraith, Benmage, etc.]
Fate = VP, Baby Spice
LB = Wicked, Baby Spice
Lynchee = Hito, [kunkstar7, MoI, El Goo, Wraith, Benmage, etc.]
or however we decide to do it.
AurorusVox wrote:EL G: what excuse do you have for taking an action that was described as useless in a post that you yourself acknowledged that you had read?
Wouldn't putting the tools in require a huge amount of coordination? And, just to make sure I have it right, they'd have to use it on the night of the stalks?Plum wrote:2. Sure, we can plan out some Murders. I'd say we start with someone we're decently comfortable with; he/she popcorns to someone he's comfortable with, we get about - four? five? no more, as you-ll see below - players together. If you're chosen you have to play, I think - and there's the tricky part, making sure everyone is okay enough with this that there'll be sufficient pressure to follow through. Then each player in turn posts three players they're interested in Stalking. Then everyone who has Forensic Tools is ordered to use them on the pool of potential Stalkees. This will make it harder for Cult to successfully use Resuscitation against the eventual Murders. When Night comes, Stalkers stalk one player from their list, chosen at random (hopefully this will minimize chances of too many overlapping Stalk/Murder actions while keeping Cult from knowing who will be targeted and whether they can combat it with Ward while also ensuring decent chances that there are as many extra Murders as chosen players and we can start clearing.
But, that's the crux. She DID. And then didn't?hit wrote:Am curious why ElG apparently didn't read my guide. The idea behind posting a picture in the thread and making it stupidly obvious that a guide is here is so we can avoid the WIFOM game of "oh, I just didn't notice x". This would appear at first glance to be one of those, but do scum really get a large benefit by lying about an investigate? Or is this more likely to be a legit mistake? I'll need to think on it.
I wouldn't be surprised. I'd be pissed because its a continuation of the failure that was yesterday. However, even if he went through with it there'd be some good to shake out in the "well we get a confirmed town right (I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU AV) if SpyreX dies" so.hit wrote:Random thought for everyone: let's say you knew you were the target of Benmage's stalk. What would be your reaction?
Ding ding we have a winner. Still playing it both sides is awesome though. "I'm just saying you're sheeping not that its scummy because its IMPORTANT business to talk about it if it means nothing but I don't think your scum unless I do"AV wrote:Maybe you and Seacore are scum together ^^
Or maybe you only sheep scum for bussing.
Or maybe you sheep erratically to defend against the accusations of sheeping.
---
Or maybe you're selective in it because you're town and you only like sheeping when you see a good case.
I don't think I've ever said sheeping was a scumtell...I said that you seemed to try to hide the fact that you were voting without adding anything. Oh - kind of like what you did with RC! Which was pointed out! Which --- you've tried to avoid being accused of!! Dun dun dunn.
---
I also asked you a couple of direct questions. Answers plox.
Ohh, I don't know, maybe going "Hmm, why is SpyreX asking for a specific answer from El Gooski?" instead of feeding it in. Which leads to this:How was I supposed to know that you were planning it when you kept quiet about it?
I'm not addressing the sheeping part because good lord. As for the 'trap':How is that not sheeping? You didn't even follow up with your epic plan to entrap El G, you just started shouting that you had one. What was it? Why can't you do it now?
Hint 1: RC is scum.You said if El G is scum, then I definitely am. What makes you think this?
GEE ITS A MYSTERY wrote:SO, the only AV - Reaper I see is a tinfoil AV - Reaper - El Gooski chain of love with him coming in and ruining where I was going.
I'm intrigued and like I said watching MoI come out swinging from the gates really raises an eye but I've got a hard time stomaching it being cult.VP wrote: Spyrex and AV need to exit the vortex of tunnelling. You're both ceasing to contribute meaningfully to the thread and we don't need that. What do you think of MoI and the case I spent my entire Saturday afternoon working on?
The pathetic answer to that question is "embarassing stupidity x 3."
-DGB
I'MMA FIRIN' up mah printin' press.Triglav wrote:@Benmage wagonDerpy-da-derpy-doo. Seriously?
Triglav demands reasoning of him being scum or officially hates you all.
Will have certificates made up.
AV is the only one who seems to be on the wagon for intelligent reasons.
And we don't think they're that intelligent.
Less tinfoil hates would be tech. Yes.
Here it is:El Goosuki wrote:Oh yeah?Nicodemus wrote:I definitely understand the El Goosuki.case
You should at least be able to point out where you've seen this, I've scanned the past 8 pages and I failed to find it.case
Since you say you agree with it, you should be able to refer me to it, right?
-DGB
Will look at the kunk and MoI cases later today. Initial reads right now give kunk a better chance of scum than MoI, but we'll see.Seacore wrote:During Day 1, El Goosuki posted this.
El Goosuki wrote:El Goosuki sends all his/her love to hitogoroshi for his guide to Investigators and baby Cthulhu picnic picture.
During N1, El Goosuki claims to have ignored this much loved guide and wasted a night action.
Vote: El Goosuki
Sigh. So we're expected to just let all of this pass as stupidity. Are any of the three of you caught up at this point?El Goosuki wrote:The pathetic answer to that question is "embarassing stupidity x 3."
-DGB
I address this later on with VV but I’ll say it here.VPBaltar wrote:MoI, do you feel this is a fair characterization? I mean, it doesn't take much to understand Furc's play, so I'd like to know if you feel like you do understand what his style is?
I think I’ve clearly indicated above my opinion on Furc. If you want to call what is in effect a Policy push on an absolutely useless player (IMO) scummy that’s your call. Given the end of Clash of Kings I know that you know exactly why I don’t want VI players around at endgame. The fact that you are specifically going out of your way to ignore your direct knowledge gives me pause.VPBaltar wrote:1) The ungodly tunnel on Furc like it was his day job.
This whole point is carefully fabricated bullshit. Had you read my ISO you would have seen my questions and criticisms of RC’s play throughout the Day BEFORE the RC wagon formed. Since you didn’t here are the ISOs for you (8,17,18 ). Yet somehow you are attempting to portray my suspicion of RC as fabricated out of mid-air. Both incorrect and scumtastic.VPBaltar wrote:3) RC wagon rolls up at the end of the day and MoI is an eager beaver to jump on that. We get a fancy pants iso of RC in 1171. I don't know, but I always find these post by post isos to be kind of scummy because people seem to rarely ever give the person a fair shake when doing them. I mean, seriously go back and read MoI's PBPA of RC. Essentially 90 percent of RCs posts are called scummy or fluff. I find this quite over the top by any measure. I mean, maybe I'm wrong and RC will flip scum, but I just find this kind of rhetoric excessive and unlikely to come from town. That of course, is sort of ironic, since Magna seems fond of attacking RC, Vas and others for their rhetorical statements. Now before Magna comes in and says 'ZOMG VAS DID IT TO ME TOOOOO,' yes I realize he did. I think he was being over the top as well, but I also feel like you were winding him up with your antagonism from his original points on you. I still find it scummy regardless, but yours on RC is worse because nothing provoked it other than you trying to trump up your vote.
At this point I’m undecided. Asking me yesterday before Night and I would have said most likely Investigator. I can see his personal grudge with Fate overriding any Town sense he had. When he didn’t follow through and kill the rendered useless Fate last night and ‘prove’ his Town cred it shoved me back into the ‘Benmage is Unknown’ category, especially in light of his epic backtrack on his reasoning for stalking in the first place. The fact that he didn’t follow through gives me pause to consider he might be cult playing a very ballys / stupid gambit. He has managed to basically derail the conversation each day with his declarations. The longer this cluster-f with him goes the more I question him as investigator. Fate’s flip will also help shape my opinion. Benmage being Investigator would be more or less solidified if Fate flips Cult.AV wrote:MoI - do you think Benmage is more likely cult or investigator?
Right back at you Sotty. Your entire argument as to why I’m scum is ‘gut’ and filled with no support – weak sauce as you say. I don’t like the direction your arguments have taken because they very much remind me of your Newbie scum game. Your statement above is further indicative. Lots of backhanded insults (re knowing who posted) and accusations – very disproporatiate to the attention I’ve give you. So, yeah, chalk me up for a similar ‘gut’ scum-read on you.Trilobyte wrote:This is just all kinds of weak sauce. You've played with me and you've played with Zach we are two quite different styles of player so even in a hydra the posting styles are going to be different. I have signed all of my posts bar a couple where I forgot, OJ has signed all her posts it doesn't take a math wiz to realize who made the others. You don't explain why it is odd and seem to be suggesting it was scummy (or else why bother bringing it up?) It just feels like a weak attempt at mud slinging.
Here’s a clue Ben – disagreeing with your play isn’t bad logic. Sorry to burst your bubble but it isn’t. Care to provide quotes of my ‘illogical’ posts as opposed to making unsubstantiated accusations as usual?Benmage wrote:MoI is my number one suspicion at the moment, every post is so illogical.
Of course you like TNM’s post he agrees with your positionBenmage wrote:I like tnm's last post. When I am at a computer I will explain why I also find kunk likely scum.
Actually you want me dead because I hurt your pride. That’s ok. I accept you can’t disconnect your personal pride from logically assessing the game.VV wrote:No claims here. I want you dead now though, so that I don't have to get your scummy blood in mah clothes.
Ah, another batch of Appealing to Repeition, rhetoric, and an added dash of stupid internet meme. Good times.VV wrote:VOTE MAGNA. FOR GREATER JUSTICE. (And then we can get rid of Kunkscum right after, ohh yeaahh.)
So you are back to ‘intentions’ again, which you abandoned the first time for ‘He’s scum because he’s not showing scum-tells’ at the end of Day 1. Yawn. When you have something noteworthly let me know.VV wrote:That was not the case, I had a full blown case revealing that MoI's INTENTIONS in thread are scummy in nature, and that was me attempting to convince people and my interpretations that his attacks on Furcolow are fail attempts to look like he's scumhunting when he is not(because he's scum etc.).
You have to admit it. It’s all you do …VV wrote:That quote is, I admit, rhetoric.
Nice … lining up lynches. Either classic scum play or more example of fail-Town VV traditional play.VV wrote: Nice try scum. Kunkstar lynch after we are done with MoI, k.
I do know Furc is a derpy players. Which is why he needs to be eliminated. Allowing VI’s into endgame situations is VERY STUPID Town play in a large game. It allows, I don’t know, Mafia in a horrible PoE situation to go on to win when they have no rights to do so (see Clash of Kings as a perfect example).VV wrote:MoI has a lot of experience with Furc. He knows that Furc is a derpy player. However he is incessant in his attacks despite knowledge of Furc's play. He didn't even attempt to figure out Furc's alignment and just kept calling him scum for shits and giggles. I found the bullshit in his attacks.
Add that he cares more about his own image than figuring other people out = MoI is SCUM SCUM SCUM.
Look, I’m so Town it hurts. I’m very worried about Corpse Dust because it would make 1 kill by the Cult more successful despite the fact that we have SO MANY PLAYERS all Town can’t possibly be adequately protected anyway.VV wrote:PS. Why are there so many votes on Fate's dispatch? Aren't we minimizing the body count to prevent Cult getting dust? I thought this has already been discussed.
Slight FOS on everyone at the wagon. THERE BE SCUMZ THERE TOO. (Specifically MoI but you get the drill.)
Poor meta argument is poor. Clearly you are trying to make an issue of the fact that I (Zach) don't sign my posts to pad a case you don't actually have. (Further padded by attempting to vaguely link Sotty's posting meta to a newbie game scum game she played a while back.)MagnaofIllusion wrote:Right back at you Sotty. Your entire argument as to why I’m scum is ‘gut’ and filled with no support – weak sauce as you say. I don’t like the direction your arguments have taken because they very much remind me of your Newbie scum game. Your statement above is further indicative. Lots of backhanded insults (re knowing who posted) and accusations – very disproporatiate to the attention I’ve give you. So, yeah, chalk me up for a similar ‘gut’ scum-read on you.Trilobyte wrote:This is just all kinds of weak sauce. You've played with me and you've played with Zach we are two quite different styles of player so even in a hydra the posting styles are going to be different. I have signed all of my posts bar a couple where I forgot, OJ has signed all her posts it doesn't take a math wiz to realize who made the others. You don't explain why it is odd and seem to be suggesting it was scummy (or else why bother bringing it up?) It just feels like a weak attempt at mud slinging.
The fact that you don't bother to do anything case wise but latch on with a "I love VP's case" when one is posted strengthens my suspicions.
I didn't even abandon that. I had my interpretations, you had your explanation. Your explanation fails. End discussion.MoI wrote:So you are back to ‘intentions’ again, which you abandoned the first time for ‘He’s scum because he’s not showing scum-tells’ at the end of Day 1. Yawn. When you have something noteworthly let me know.
Soo, we have pocket insults. And lookie here! Pocket scumtells! WOAH.MoI wrote:Nice … lining up lynches. Either classic scum play or more example of fail-Town VV traditional play.
Yawn. I use rhetoric, sure I do! I mean, we have to convince people right? Stating analysis is boring, and people don't read analysis. I had a case on you because your pushing for Furc is horribad plus other stuff.MoI wrote:I do know Furc is a derpy players. Which is why he needs to be eliminated. Allowing VI’s into endgame situations is VERY STUPID Town play in a large game. It allows, I don’t know, Mafia in a horrible PoE situation to go on to win when they have no rights to do so (see Clash of Kings as a perfect example).
Furc is not going to win this game for Town. The Cult are not going to kill him because he’s derpy. Call it a Policy lynch if you wish. This early in the game it’s better to eliminate the landmines when Town has breathing room than later when it cost Town the game.
And look, yet more rhetoric.
What a horrible accusation. I expected more from you, tsk tsk. Apparently, questioning a useless dispatch wagon that is possibly cult-driven because it can help them gather corpse dust is a plea for Town cred. Moreover, suspecting said wagon is what people SHOULD be doing.MoI wrote:Look, I’m so Town it hurts. I’m very worried about Corpse Dust because it would make 1 kill by the Cult more successful despite the fact that we have SO MANY PLAYERS all Town can’t possibly be adequately protected anyway.
Here VV is churning desperately for Town cred. Scumtastic.
VOTE: VV
Because I can.