Page 85 of 156
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:42 am
by Cutty Shark
That would mean at least two players who are neither mafia nor town in the game, though
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:42 am
by Anatole Kuragin
I'd say an SK is non-neutral because his wincon would typically involve the other factions being dead.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:43 am
by Cutty Shark
That's probably true; I've never had to think about what 'neutral' would mean other than 'modkilled neutral survivor'
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:45 am
by Lissa
sorry, I'm slow.
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Hm, you're right lissa. I think there is some lack of parity between implied flavor of kills from the PM and flavor of kills from kill descriptions. Unless the flavor is different for a different member of that faction?
Seems like it.
That's possible. Difficult to tell with one scum flip.
↑ Cutty Shark wrote:I am really surprised a killing third party would exist in a game where we can allegedly win with 'neutrals', depends on definition on neutral I guess
I kinda feel like we're getting nowhere definitive with this
-b
That is sort of weird.
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote: ↑ The Fonz wrote:This page makes me think 'Anatole as wizard SK who can do mind control' is a distinct possibility.
Do you think I would introduce mind control as a possibility if I was the one doing it?
Good point... though there is certainly some WIFOM possibility there.
↑ The Fonz wrote:"Arrange to be taken out of commission for a while' could totally fit the IHNC kill.
We can't win with 'neutrals' though. Town WC is all mafia and neutrals dead.
good point.
I'm a little baffled here as to what faction killed who. It's really hard to tell because yeah, honey bee's listed factional kill flavor could kind of fit either kill.
And do we even know for sure that we HAVE a second faction/third party killer and not a vig?
I doubt a SK would be considered "neutral." It's an anti-town third. Survivor, for example, would be "neutral."
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:45 am
by The Fonz
Neutral typically means 'win condition not directly incompatible with either the mafia or town WC.'
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:46 am
by The Fonz
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote: ↑ The Fonz wrote:This page makes me think 'Anatole as wizard SK who can do mind control' is a distinct possibility.
Do you think I would introduce mind control as a possibility if I was the one doing it?
Sure, except you didn't, I did.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:46 am
by Cutty Shark
Yeah. SK def doesn't fit under that; kill flavor kind of does imply SK on FT though
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:47 am
by Cutty Shark
I could buy one of the informed roles (5-off, Oka) being third-party of some kind
But this is all just spitballing
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:49 am
by Lissa
↑ The Fonz wrote: ↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote: ↑ The Fonz wrote:This page makes me think 'Anatole as wizard SK who can do mind control' is a distinct possibility.
Do you think I would introduce mind control as a possibility if I was the one doing it?
Sure, except you didn't, I did.
oh.
Good point.
↑ Cutty Shark wrote:Yeah. SK def doesn't fit under that; kill flavor kind of does imply SK on FT though
-b
Yeah that would fit...
I'm still unsure though. The kill flavor isn't exactly all-telling.
↑ Cutty Shark wrote:I could buy one of the informed roles (5-off, Oka) being third-party of some kind
But this is all just spitballing
-b
I suggested 5-off might be a neutral third waaay back and I think Baboon agreed it was a plausible theory.
It's very possible 5-off or OkaPoka is just that.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:50 am
by Nashville Dreams
↑ Cutty Shark wrote:And we know that Nashville targeted them, so I want to know exactly what they did
-b
We watched Fonz try to contact Tammy. Our PM says she was in a hurry and someone was trying to flag her down. She almost runs them over.
Then we wake up in our bed. We have no knowledge of what happened in the middle.
Any further I should run by Mala first but I have left crumbs.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:51 am
by The Fonz
BTW - if we manage to get through today without outing the remaining roles, massclaim should happen tomorrow.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:52 am
by The Fonz
'Almost run over' also happened to me - that's what I was referring to when I said GW was driving as if I weren't there.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:53 am
by Cutty Shark
Nashville did you target F-16 (and let's refer to the slot as such from now on) or did you target someone else?
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:53 am
by Cutty Shark
↑ The Fonz wrote:'Almost run over' also happened to me - that's what I was referring to when I said GW was driving as if I weren't there.
I don't think it's an also I think you're describing the same event from different POVs
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:55 am
by The Fonz
Nah. I didn't try to flag down the car. That appears to be someone else/happens later.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:58 am
by The Fonz
Which suggests that half the game tried to target GW
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:59 am
by Nashville Dreams
↑ Cutty Shark wrote:Nashville did you target F-16 (and let's refer to the slot as such from now on) or did you target someone else?
-b
We targeted F16. We happened to see Fonz presumably. His name is not mentioned.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:00 am
by The Fonz
Ah, OK. Then we are describing the same encounter.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:01 am
by Nashville Dreams
↑ The Fonz wrote:Nah. I didn't try to flag down the car. That appears to be someone else/happens later.
Thr implication was you were trying to reach F16 and they ignored you and almost ran you over. It was not someone flagging.
Can you clarify the under yhe influence point?
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:01 am
by Nashville Dreams
↑ The Fonz wrote:Ah, OK. Then we are describing the same encounter.
We are. Otherwise I would not have jumped in.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:04 am
by The Fonz
↑ Nashville Dreams wrote: ↑ The Fonz wrote:Nah. I didn't try to flag down the car. That appears to be someone else/happens later.
Thr implication was you were trying to reach F16 and they ignored you and almost ran you over. It was not someone flagging.
Can you clarify the under yhe influence point?
I tried to communicate with them prior to them getting in the car in a manner that, if someone in every day life did it, would be literally impossible to ignore. Then the nearly running me over thing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:05 am
by Cutty Shark
I almost want to say 'fuck it, massclaim' right now
mainly because i need the following answered:
1) what was F-16 doing last night
2) why might he have been drugged or whatever
3) who can corroborate AK's claim?
4) who can interact with us? I have reason to believe someone can
-b
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:10 am
by Anatole Kuragin
Does nobody else have any mention whatsoever of items in their PM?
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:12 am
by Lissa
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Does nobody else have any mention whatsoever of items in their PM?
My PM does not mention items. If that wasn't already clear.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:14 am
by The Fonz
Nor mine.
(I thought the items thing might be a stall for time on Anatole's part, but it's hard to see why he'd be inviting everyone else to confirm his 'PM' sticks out like a sore thumb if he were faking it).