Mafiascum.net

In post 2087, TiphaineDeath wrote:This is a better wagon than NPOM today because they should not be the same alignment.

If we exec Chkflip and he's town, how do you get from that to NPOM -> Scum ?

@chk the defense of you haven't read doesn't really hold water. He may have a bad argument, but using that defense is a non-starter.

Consider me in the execute lavender sooner rather than later camp.

TRs
a2rudeboy
Iecerint
pisskop
npom (probably)
chkflip

Scum/3p: walter

VOTE: walterthedunce

The possibility that you are scum with siteflake and NPOM is miraculously town is what I am looking at right now CHK.

I wasn't calling you stupid, never have, I read what you said as you calling yourself unintelligent, which was odd to me.

Also, I laughed my ass off at "scum vibes go brrrr." xD

@Pooky, I don't get it 100%, but if I can successfully push a wagon on !town CHK at this point it will be because there are some number of scum on it with me, which severely indicates the previous leading wagon is scum, i.e, npom

and thus the conclusion for D3 is to then push NPOM if Chk flips town?

D1: "let's wagon NPOM"
D2: "let's wagon NPOM"
D3: "if chk flips town, let's wagon NPOM"

-sigh-

if we are gonna wagon NPOM, let's fucking do it.
if we are gonna wagon Lav, let's fucking do it.

IKS flip gave us some stuff to analyze, but i don't think it's moved the game state forward, as we are basically having the same arguments as D1, now with one less scum and one less town.

@Bear I mean, there is more information to be gathered between here and there, but yeah, prolly.

@Rudeboi, I've been on NPOM's ass this entire game, from the start, from the word fracking go. I keep getting off him because you have your wierd "info," that says I should, and because other people keep being worse, but he's been scummy AF the whole damn time. What else do you want me to do with him?

I'm actually contributing is the thing. I'm not comparable to lav.

But if people aren't going to stop focusing on me instead of actual scum I volunteer to be the elim.

In post 2110, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm actually contributing is the thing. I'm not comparable to lav.

In post 2111, NoPowerOverMe wrote:But if people aren't going to stop focusing on me instead of actual scum I volunteer to be the elim.

Your insistent whining and AtE is getting you scum read. Posts like these are getting you scum read. If you'd stop talking about yourself you wouldn't be caught in this feedback loop. Is that your roll? Troll?

What exactly have you contributed?

actually im scumreading him off IKS refusal to wagon him even when near death and I'm not even looking at the Ate/Whining

btw iff you want to catch scum u should come up with something that is credible

In post 2109, TiphaineDeath wrote:@Bear I mean, there is more information to be gathered between here and there, but yeah, prolly.

It just seems to me that if you are insisting that Chk/Npom is T/S that the better choice would be to flip Npom

In post 2113, NoPowerOverMe wrote:What exactly have you contributed?

If you want to push me, make it a proper push, but don't try to Venn diagram with that. That dog don't hunt.

I think Chk is more likely to be the scum of the two so I would rather flip him? But I'm also fine to see NPOM die today. I have said before that any of NPOM/Walter/Chk is cool with me.

In post 2117, TiphaineDeath wrote:I think Chk is more likely to be the scum of the two so I would rather flip him? But I'm also fine to see NPOM die today. I have said before that any of NPOM/Walter/Chk is cool with me.

you really think chk-scum hard-defends iks-scum yesterday?

Defending scum makes you town now?

nope

VOTE: NPOM

This is another naked vote, yes. But reading him gives me no town indication so losing him ain't that bad.

If he thinks he can get NPOM lynched and let iks coast for a few days, possibly forever on "troll not scum," hell yes he does. I would.

so you're saying CHK-Scum decided to hardpush NPOM-Town to save IKS-Scum when IKS-scum himself is refusing to push NPOM-Town to begin with? I mean that just doesn't make a lot of sense to me

In post 1978, Lavender wrote:I would search up beetlejuicing but I can guess the context. *o*

It means you only show up in the game after someone says WHERE IS LAVENDER. This makes people think that you are reading the thread, but not contributing to it, because if you weren't reading at all, you wouldn't notice people commenting on you. This means the explanation for your low participation is other than ignoring the game. Scum are more likely to have low activity than town on average, because town have a mystery to solve using the game, and scum already know the answer to the main mystery of the game (or at least to part of the mystery). So, your pattern of behavior leads people to infer you could be scum.

It is the same logic that led me to think you were scum in the last Baker game. But, I know you were town in that game. So, I think it will be helpful to maybe give advice on ways to participate. (FWIW, I thought your readslist was fine. Your section about me showed that you were thinking about what you knew about me from this game and our last game and that you were trying to make something of it.)

Try posting about something on the page you just read whenever you catch up on the game. Here are some options, from lower-effort to higher-effort:

LOW EFFORT
1. Attachment: You can make a post expressing your positive or negative feelings toward a player
2. Suggestion: You can recommend that a player, or players in general, do a particular thing
3. Clarification: You can ask a player to explain something to you
4. Confrontation: You can point out a contraindication in someone's thinking
5. Interpretation: You can say that one or more things a player does suggests that player has a certain motivation (e.g., that they are town or scum)
HIGH EFFORT