Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:46 pm
Also, are you implying that I said that as a reason for people to vote for you? That clearly had NOTHING to do with you.
talk about defensive.
talk about defensive.
In post 2119, JarJarDrinks wrote:how do you know that?In post 2117, Andriod18 wrote:I do agree with not lynching Vax today because he's a vig
You asked me to explain when I already answered the question in the first place.In post 2123, JarJarDrinks wrote:Please point me to the post where you answer this question:In post 2121, Andriod18 wrote:I didn't ignore your question in the first place you just didn't like the answer.In post 1089, JarJarDrinks wrote: 795 and 842 are the posts you quoted. You say u are scumreading me because I was being overly-defensive in them. Please explain.
^In post 2039, JarJarDrinks wrote:Also, speak for yourself. I'm pretty sure I've lynched more scum than town on this site.In post 1994, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Townies are wrong 90% of the time.
I implied no such thing but of course you're gonna twist it like thatIn post 2125, JarJarDrinks wrote:Also, are you implying that I said that as a reason for people to vote for you? That clearly had NOTHING to do with you.
Yes I did miss this ty.In post 2126, JarJarDrinks wrote:and did u miss this?In post 2119, JarJarDrinks wrote:how do you know that?In post 2117, Andriod18 wrote:I do agree with not lynching Vax today because he's a vig
LIAR!In post 2127, Andriod18 wrote:You asked me to explain when I already answered the question in the first place.
WHAT AM I DEFENDING?In post 2127, Andriod18 wrote:This is you trying to make yourself look good it's a defense for no reason other than to get people to listen to you
here is you implying it:In post 2127, Andriod18 wrote:I implied no such thing but of course you're gonna twist it like thatIn post 2125, JarJarDrinks wrote:Also, are you implying that I said that as a reason for people to vote for you? That clearly had NOTHING to do with you.
I mean, you're more than implying it. You're p much outright stating it.In post 2121, Andriod18 wrote:You acting like you lynch more scum than town so you should have more say in your reads is laughable and something I don't see why town would need to say instead of explaining why I'm scum
yeah if I was getting knocked around as bad as you've been, I'd bow out also.In post 2128, Andriod18 wrote:If you have any more questions for me Jar feel free to state them in your next post I'll be back after holiday.
Anybody got a flashlight? It's very dark under all this shade.In post 2116, Andriod18 wrote:Can I have your reasons behind this vote on tex? I would join that wagon from the looks of it but I would like to hear your reasons first and see if they match up with mine at all
let's seeIn post 2131, texcat wrote:Anybody got a flashlight? It's very dark under all this shade.In post 2116, Andriod18 wrote:Can I have your reasons behind this vote on tex? I would join that wagon from the looks of it but I would like to hear your reasons first and see if they match up with mine at all
why is jarjar good vote?In post 2120, WhemeStar wrote:On page 81
I have work so maybe will catch up after work
Jar jar is a good vote for now
i was really excited about being hard townIn post 2089, Hopkirk wrote:Scion's tone just reads as genuine.
Creature looks fine.In post 2137, Scioness Sajj wrote:what's upIn post 2134, Creature wrote:Called me? Guess not
you're not looking so good
Idk why does it matterIn post 2122, PenguinPower wrote:So why not vote?In post 2120, WhemeStar wrote:On page 81
I have work so maybe will catch up after work
Jar jar is a good vote for now
This is kind of an ewww semantic huntingIn post 2118, JarJarDrinks wrote:Ok, you called 2 of my posts defensive yesterday and when I repeatedly asked you to explain how they were defensive, you literally had no answer.In post 2116, Andriod18 wrote:I still dislike Jarjars push on me his smug and defense of I lynch more scum than town is a weak defense and a bad one at that.
So here you are again claiming I'm defending something. Would you care to explain what exactly my "I lynch more scum than town" is a defense of?
Or are you gonna again ignore my question and disappear for 3 days?
what is your read on jarjar?In post 2122, PenguinPower wrote:So why not vote?In post 2120, WhemeStar wrote:On page 81
I have work so maybe will catch up after work
Jar jar is a good vote for now
It was about "defending" the point you were trying to imply obvIn post 2124, JarJarDrinks wrote:ok but thats not what you said. You said it was a "weak defense". What was it a defense of?In post 2121, Andriod18 wrote:You acting like you lynch more scum than town so you should have more say in your reads is laughable and something I don't see why town would need to say instead of explaining why I'm scum
That is a good point.In post 2125, JarJarDrinks wrote:Also, are you implying that I said that as a reason for people to vote for you? That clearly had NOTHING to do with you.
talk about defensive.
what was discussed a few pages ago?!!!In post 2127, Andriod18 wrote:Yes I did miss this ty.In post 2126, JarJarDrinks wrote:and did u miss this?In post 2119, JarJarDrinks wrote:how do you know that?In post 2117, Andriod18 wrote:I do agree with not lynching Vax today because he's a vig
It was already talked about a few pages ago
Yeah their vote sucked as much as your vote sucked and maybe moreIn post 2136, Scioness Sajj wrote:mylon is ????? wagon like from what i have seen i would not expect any content from him
but he's apparently easy to read, at least that's what i have heard. if anybody claims meta ability on mylo hmu i will consider sheeping