Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:47 am
How the fuck does fake claiming a TPR get scum to end game what the fuckIn post 1694, Looker wrote:Even as a bus to endgame?
How the fuck does fake claiming a TPR get scum to end game what the fuckIn post 1694, Looker wrote:Even as a bus to endgame?
Extremely wish we had gone with this planIn post 1693, Blair wrote:Ok.
Popopo Vig Tonight: Truth
VOTE: NDMath
That should clear up quite a few things I think?
Hmm would caught scum name his teammates here for WIFOMIn post 1736, popopopopopopo wrote:i think one of looker dunnstral or ndmath is scum, maybe 2. like the fact that both those major wagons were on town and it took that long for either of them to go through points to an inactive scumteam.
umIn post 1743, Truth wrote:Because I am town, Blair! Please don't shoot me if you're the vigilante.Does my buddy really need to prove this to be the case?
Dunnstral's plan where we let the vigilante shoot po if he's lying seems like a good idea.
But who else should be lynch today instead? osuka and po were my main suspects.
Literally 100% of this post is insaneIn post 2121, Looker wrote:How much longer can Blair live before you start to suspect her?In post 2098, Dunnstral wrote:I'm townreading Nauci and Glitch, it's between NDmath, Truth, and Looker for me
- I think Nauci is noncommittal.
- I feel she's pseudo-distancing with Truth - she says she thinks he's scum, but she doesn't look like she's trying to flip him. She looks like she's hedging her bets on no one forming a wagon on him. If they do, she gets to jump on, saying "Well I suspected him the whole time".
- Blair's lying - I interact with everybody. Not everyone squats over their phone all day, looking at a fucking mafia thread. I don't know what these expectations are that I'm not meeting.
- I'd hope Nauci saying I'm either crazy or stupid would be beneath her.
- So Blair thinks I avoided mislynching Osuka, but bussed popopo?
- And, depending on who she "vigged", she agreed with either my or Glitch's suspicions. I suspected GuiltyLion, Glitch suspected Cat Scratch Fever. The double standard isn't making sense to me.
- I question whether Nauci coached Truth in the scum PT, because her Post 2112 resembles Truth's Post 619, where he urged other people to start bandwagons that he was not going to be a part of.
I fucking can't with this gameIn post 2129, Truth wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
Then we should go back to the lynching Dunnstral plan. I did not know Blair was the vigilante so I find it cool I managed to predict it.
I really don't think Glitch and Truth could be scum togetherIn post 1751, Glitch wrote:If you truly are a mason you would not out your buddy for the scum to see who that buddy is, giving them an additional target, unless you needed to do it to avoid being lynched, and right now you aren't being threatened to be lynched. You are being threatened to be shot by popo, theIn post 1743, Truth wrote:Because I am town, Blair! Please don't shoot me if you're the vigilante. Does my buddy really need to prove this to be the case?supposedvigilante.
But you believe popo is scum. If you actually believe this then why are you worried that popo will shoot you at night as the vig? If po is either vig or scum, he could have killed you last night and didn't. If you were truly were a mason, and truly believed popo is scum, you would not even think of outing your buddy when the town wants vig!popo to shoot at you... because you don't believe popo is the vig.
So which is it? Do you believe popo is scum, which you have believed for a very, very long time? Or did his vig claim change your read on him?
This post plus 2129 make me feel like the post I quoted before was more likely to be a scum slip than notIn post 1753, Truth wrote:That's a lot of questions, Glitch. I'll try answering the one about if I think po is mafia.
I think po is most likely mafia but he may be town. If he is town, then it would be really bad if he shot me with his vigilante. That is why I asked the vigilante whoever they are not to shoot me.
Blair ignored my question and I don't like this. I think mafia sometimes dodge questions that are hard to answer.
This was fucking dumbIn post 1765, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If there’s a real vig i suggest thwm to just claim right now. It’s better to lynch than shoot a scum. Shot’s can be interferred with. Lynches are eternal.
Dunnstral and I did, did we not?In post 1804, Blair wrote:No one wanted to follow my plan, so here we are.
In post 1831, LicketyQuickety wrote:You know, if you didn't come across so pompous and self centered all the time my reasons for SRing you every game would probably go down drastically.
In post 1839, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not pompous for one. Self centered, maybe, but I don't act like I am better than other people.In post 1836, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So you are very good at scum Quick? Noted.
I might have an aneurysm from the dumb but at least I got an ab workout from the hilarityIn post 1840, popopopopopopo wrote:thank you quick, the only reasonable logical player right now it seems
soIn post 1847, LicketyQuickety wrote:Or is it just that you think Blair is a better player than me so I don't really deserve to say what I am saying?
I totally missed this since I've not been active but I had been wondering about it for a week and am really happy to see that it was already implementedIn post 1869, Deimos27 wrote:I didn't get the memo about the recent rule change. I will make the necessary adaptations.
Uh... you're lying though, you did know at this point:In post 2129, Truth wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
Then we should go back to the lynching Dunnstral plan. I did not know Blair was the vigilante so I find it cool I managed to predict it.
In post 1987, Truth wrote:My paranoid suspect read is Blair. If she's a mafia vigilante, we will keep trusting her and she can just get ignored of all suspicions,
In post 1992, Truth wrote:Even if it's unusual, could it not still show up sometimes, Dunnstral? When is the last time people here played with a mafia vigilante?
I legitimately cannot figure out if he meant that he didn't know it as of 10 minutes ago, or he didn't know that at the time of the post I quoted from himIn post 2141, Dunnstral wrote:Uh... you're lying though, you did know at this point:In post 2129, Truth wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
Then we should go back to the lynching Dunnstral plan. I did not know Blair was the vigilante so I find it cool I managed to predict it.
In post 1987, Truth wrote:My paranoid suspect read is Blair. If she's a mafia vigilante, we will keep trusting her and she can just get ignored of all suspicions,In post 1992, Truth wrote:Even if it's unusual, could it not still show up sometimes, Dunnstral? When is the last time people here played with a mafia vigilante?
VOTE: Truth
In post 2122, Dunnstral wrote:Looker, there are no mafia vigilantes in normal queue games - it's not a role combination that can exist
There can also be no serial killers in mini normals
It's confirmed that the extra killing power came from town
I just wanted to make sure there'd be no backpedaling with a counterclaim.In post 2123, Dunnstral wrote:I feel like I've said this already
Do you still feel Nauci is above suspicion despite her doing what I'd predicted she'd do? (Waiting to push Truth until someone forced her to) She naked voted a minute after you and then tried to offer a soft excuse for what Truth posted.
Please counterclaim. It would make today so much easier.In post 2144, Looker wrote:I just wanted to make sure there'd be no backpedaling with a counterclaim.