Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:13 pm
he's lolcatting
In post 2125, Bypasser Catcher wrote:he's lolcatting
and there u have itIn post 2126, Nero Cain wrote:yes
this guy is either scummy as fuck or so biased its sad and funny all at the same timeIn post 2125, Bypasser Catcher wrote:he's lolcatting
when did u see the claim?In post 2126, Nero Cain wrote:yes
ok see u in gy thread when u whine about how i caught u for "wrong reasons" or whatever salty scum doesIn post 2130, Nero Cain wrote:this guy is either scummy as fuck or so biased its sad and funny all at the same timeIn post 2125, Bypasser Catcher wrote:he's lolcatting
It kinda is, but the things I'm seeing meet/exceed the feeling I have on that and I was pretty confident about my read (I will not say tunneled because I didn't take a lot of prompting to reconsider, it just took hitting the right note for me) so I want to take a step backIn post 2116, Bypasser Catcher wrote:how is that not a major red flagIn post 2114, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't feel like that makes the SR more valid per se. Everyone has their own perspective, and certain things may come off as sketchy generally but have different aspects that people latch on to.In post 1979, Momrangal wrote:I disagree on gamma, we got scum pings on the same post for two different reasonsIn post 1981, Nero Cain wrote:Whats your current solve Titus? NM. Luca, Hayker, Quiet?These posts by Nero kinda seem natural. It reminds me of how he formed his reads in LN 230. I still am concerned about his noticing the NM claim without a clear reason for paying attention to it, but I think the things Titus and Nero are saying rn resonate with me enough for me to look past that rn.In post 1983, Nero Cain wrote:these are ppl that I don't townread-the players on my wagon.
weekend probIn post 2136, quiet wrote:huh I guess the nero wagon was viable after all.
I may have had very light reasons to vote Nero when I jumped on the wagon from Hayker, but I am exceptionally happy to be on this wagon right now. My vote stays. Don't buy the claim whatsoever. The only progression I saw was anger at everyone voting them -> depression self vote -> no point in bargaining -> acceptance of their fate. But also I know for a fact I don't like playing with angry players, and that might be coloring my read. I didn't have the time I wanted to read over old games, but I'm satisfied enough with what has been said.
Plus I'm with Norfolk, and a few others. This sure as hell seems to provide a lot more info than Hayker's elim.
Also the gamestate seemed to change pretty seriously since I last posted. Today was some early susses, then an almost casual hammer on NM, a slow moving, stalled out wagon on Hayker, then whatever the hell the last 20something pages have been of fighting over Nero's slot. Three very different wagons.
Does anyone have a take on why the game slowed down when Hayker was up? Is it just because it wasn't a very exciting elim?
when did u see the NM claim?In post 2135, Nero Cain wrote:its not that I wasn't interested in it its just that I hadn't read the 30 pages I missed over the weekend and then u clowns started tunneling me and I was like "fuk this noise"
yeah I was fakeclaiming. im still town though. pls vote me.In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.
If Nero is scum then i wager it's because Hayker was a wagon on a lurking town slot so scum didn't bother trying to defend him, hence the dull and unexciting gameplay.In post 2136, quiet wrote:Does anyone have a take on why the game slowed down when Hayker was up? Is it just because it wasn't a very exciting elim?
Is it worth outing a PR to catch scum? Is there a guarantee that there is only one Tracker PR? Cause if we can use this to sort NM sooner than waiting for that weak every other night BS, I'm all for it.In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.