Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 7:28 am
I will go back to Andante if needed.
inb4 "I was blocked."In post 2109, The Three Bears wrote:Ircher confirms tonight, simples.
inb4 "I was blocked."In post 2109, The Three Bears wrote:Ircher confirms tonight, simples.
Looks like it's time, then. Let's see what you got.In post 2064, Roden wrote:@Val: I'll reply to you on Day 2 (or today if Ircher claims a PR and people get cold feet)
how is that funny? its something i do more often than not.In post 2070, catboi wrote:noraa casing STD with "too towny to be town" in 1773 is pretty funny. Can't say I agree though - not like that level of depth in his reads is typical of his scum game either. Simplest answer is when a hard to read player is more involved than they typically are is that they're town and just happen to be extra motivated that game.
So talk it out, instead of threatening to talk to me, trying talking to me.In post 2117, Tet wrote:If you were higher in my townreads I'd leave it be but I happen to think roden has fair scum equity.
worst case scenario for us is that we elim ircher tomorrow because he claims he was blocked and he flips town. but he still ate up scum's RB and we'll know scum has a RB when Ircher flips what he flips. best case scenario, he gets cleared and we didnt just randomly kill a literal FN on day 1 :/In post 2126, Toogeloo wrote:inb4 "I was blocked."In post 2109, The Three Bears wrote:Ircher confirms tonight, simples.
no gallon literally just voted ircher and toog is arguing we should still vote there. they are not from yesterdayIn post 2132, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:noraa pls u keep lookin like u are trying to setup miseliminations and that isnt even fuckin possible in this case like somehow u still manage it ???? idgi. like chill buddy u are making ur slot look scum LOL
PEDIT NORAA those votes are from ppl who havent even logged on today LOL CHILL
i saw that actually. its just that before that he was like i still feel nully so i was like this will not do.In post 2139, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:also galron voted tictac last pls read the votecounts one time noraa
my impression is that tictac tends to be quiet as either alignment, posts with actual content have some level of solvyness I don't hate, trajectory point is eh, could see it either way reallyIn post 2102, Tet wrote:I didn't hate his early posting, the back and forth with your slot actually. But I don't like that the contentious slots he's leaving open ended. What's specifically relevant now is his Ircher trajectory which goes :
Early ping/null with a downward trajectory because of It hers lack of posting (which didn't pick up) -> Ircher town because too many slots are scumreading them...ok -> wouldn't touch that wagon as it's about to flip.
But what really rubs me wrong is the posturing with the vote on Andante with nothing to back it up. As opposed to just riding his vanity wagon on std where he has at least pushed a case. It all comes off very fake. Even under the premise of compromise since it's just jumping from a nothing wagon to another nothing wagon.
I also did have the brief thought that tictac throwing mud at std might be important timing-wise on a red flip but I'd have to look back at who the leading wagon was. Or just a direct chainsaw for roden maybe.
And what is this referring to?In post 2128, The Three Bears wrote:Everything here is toned down and posted with the PURPOSE of making his reads softer.
VOTE: tictacIn post 2102, Tet wrote:I didn't hate his early posting, the back and forth with your slot actually. But I don't like that the contentious slots he's leaving open ended. What's specifically relevant now is his Ircher trajectory which goes :
Early ping/null with a downward trajectory because of It hers lack of posting (which didn't pick up) -> Ircher town because too many slots are scumreading them...ok -> wouldn't touch that wagon as it's about to flip.
But what really rubs me wrong is the posturing with the vote on Andante with nothing to back it up. As opposed to just riding his vanity wagon on std where he has at least pushed a case. It all comes off very fake. Even under the premise of compromise since it's just jumping from a nothing wagon to another nothing wagon.
I also did have the brief thought that tictac throwing mud at std might be important timing-wise on a red flip but I'd have to look back at who the leading wagon was. Or just a direct chainsaw for roden maybe.
This doesn't explain anythingIn post 2124, Galron wrote:Thank you, Cap'n.In post 2121, Dunnstral wrote:I give you permission to speakIn post 2116, Galron wrote:Why not ask me?In post 2113, Dunnstral wrote:Galron's vote hopping is nonsense, why were they voting for me?
In post 1987, Galron wrote:OkayIn post 1946, The Three Bears wrote:Vote Arcade, even if it's just to see what Adante does.In post 1944, Galron wrote:Andante got scummy all of a sudden
~Mama
VOTE: Dunnstral
It's an sufficiently strong enough claim that i don't mind giving it time even if it is scum tbh. Because if they lying it will become obvious.In post 2145, Cephrir wrote:I'm never sure whether the right play is to give this type of claim a day. It seems like the consensus is yes so my opinion doesnt really matter.
Could you explain how his posts are doing this with examples?In post 2128, The Three Bears wrote:Everything here is toned down and posted with the PURPOSE of making his reads softer