My initial and continuing scum read. I'm not sure why 2 days is a very little amount of time ssk, when i started playing around christmas it was on a site with 24 hour phases. 2 days seems like a lot of time. I do agree that this dp shouldn't go to random lynch if we haven't reached a majority, but my vote is mostly based on my persistently scummy (although one time null) read on selkies.
Kindly stop ignoring my question about your Kabooom scum read.
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:01 pm
by Cabd
This is me not hammering. That means Im confirmed town, right? Good.
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:03 pm
by Guyett
In post 2151, Cabd wrote:This is me not hammering. That means Im confirmed town, right? Good.
nope. I've already hinted at it. Thought that would be sufficient. Let just say that my reason for getting off of SSK is because my role makes me believe that he is not lying
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:11 pm
by Cabd
UNVOTE: VOTE: Goodfather
FIne, we can run you up to L-1 and you claim the old fashioned way.
My initial and continuing scum read. I'm not sure why 2 days is a very little amount of time ssk, when i started playing around christmas it was on a site with 24 hour phases. 2 days seems like a lot of time. I do agree that this dp shouldn't go to random lynch if we haven't reached a majority, but my vote is mostly based on my persistently scummy (although one time null) read on selkies.
Kindly stop ignoring my question about your Kabooom scum read.
sorry, wasn't avoiding it intentionally; it was just gut. I was playing with him in another game before i subbed and he seemed equally as scummy. Pure gut. If it were a stronger read i would have tried to pursue it further.
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:15 pm
by Guyett
its called bussing.... dur
I just don't like the way your wagon dissipated yesterday and your play seems nothing like your super obv town posting in red wine mafia.
I strongly suspect you are scum but if you aren't at least your lynch will be quite informative.
Some of your posts seem off. 1946 for example.
Also if you are town goodfather (another scum read of mine) will likely bite a bullet.
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:15 pm
by zMuffinMan
goodfather wrote:I've already hinted at it.
i know you've been hinting at something
that's why i want you to claim
because there are certain things i want to check make sense when i see what your actual claim is
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:15 pm
by Selkies
And these 6 posts gave you enough of a gut scum impression that it's still impacting your Nacho read.
Please elaborate on what in those posts bothers your gut.
he hasn't done anything completely antitown, he hasn't self-voted and he hasn't asked to be lynched
Is this a joke or something from meta? Because I don't understand.
FourTrouble. Thanks for finally explaining your vote, but I think your preoccupied with how I play. Some people throw votes and pressure around and use that to find scum, I tend to think out loud and see what people respond to and see how they interact with eachother. You can call it cautious or unagressive, but in my opinion you're more likely to find scum in someone who is trying too hard or being ingenuine. There's no room for townies to be deceptive. And if I was going after easy lynches, I'd be campaigning hard against some who would have a hard time defending himself, this game has a couple. My vote isn't on anyone yet and it'll stay that way until I have more to go on. I'm interested in King Kenny and Kaboooom because I don't have anything on them right now, and I want to compare them to the people who are currently topping my scum list
this isn't unexpected!
actually i m a pretty active player and post pretty often! But i m not being able to follow you guys! And those spams in the starting are really irritating! All what happens in the start is RVS fight and fight,over rules! I haven't read this game with full attention then after. I gave a quick look at iso of all players and selkies and cabd looked more suspicious! As selkies was a hydra and she had more votes, I thought of sheeping her, as if she is scum she will scum slip and if she is not, then the scums would go for hammer. If she seems town even under pressure then go for one of the most suspicious sheeped vote and pressure that player. If that player is scum, he ir she may scum slip. Either way, at this stage of game, i will leave scum hunting to you all.
In post 783, kabooooom wrote:I know I havent contributed anything but I dont have internet access in my phone. Hopefully it will be fixed in a day or two. Otherwise I will self hammer myself. I know how irritating it is when someone ruins the game.
no, kaboooms read and nacho's read are both based solely on their individual play.
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:20 pm
by Selkies
The Goodfather wrote:no, kaboooms read and nacho's read are both based solely on their individual play.
That's not what you said in your reads list.
In post 1297, The Goodfather wrote:8. Nachomamma8 kabooooom - like bert and NS, i am getting a mostly null vibe, but i am leaning scum just because that was how i read his slot while kaboooom was playing.
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:23 pm
by The Goodfather
at the time nacho's post style was new to me.
Many consecutive messages in short succession; lots of what seemed like inside jokes that i couldn't understand; and lackluster reads
If you want to know my role so badly i'll claim and just let the cards fall where they may.
i'm a town nurse/back up doctor
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:24 pm
by The Goodfather
not that that role reveal helps me much. As long as ssk is alive i won't be a pr (assuming he is not lying about the doctor claim)
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:26 pm
by zMuffinMan
ok. that is what i was assuming you were going to claim and that is why i wanted a mass claim
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:28 pm
by zMuffinMan
In post 1318, The Goodfather wrote:And i am especially not inclined to claim because revealing my role would put a more important role in jeopardy.
although i think this is an overstatement since it doesn't _really_ put a doc in jeopardy and doc isn't _actually_ important if you're a back-up doc
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:30 pm
by zMuffinMan
also why did it take you so long to unvote SSK after his claim? (he claimed #1644, you posted twice afterwards and then unvoted in your third post)
In post 1318, The Goodfather wrote:And i am especially not inclined to claim because revealing my role would put a more important role in jeopardy.
although i think this is an overstatement since it doesn't _really_ put a doc in jeopardy and doc isn't _actually_ important if you're a back-up doc
No, but if i confirm nurse, it might confirm to mafia that SSKs claim is true, and from what i can tell doctors are never able to protect themselves.
In post 2171, zMuffinMan wrote:also why did it take you so long to unvote SSK after his claim? (he claimed #1644, you posted twice afterwards and then unvoted in your third post)
tbh, i was being a little seflish and wanted a pr... being a nurse is basically being a vt until the doctor dies. I got over that when i realized it would mean that the town loses a member and a protective role... plus ssk will probably pick better targets as i'm still new
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:35 pm
by Cabd
Scumdoc, town nurse, town vig.... Sounds utterly like something nati would do.
