Page 87 of 236

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:28 am
by mhsmith0
will be back tonight and will actually read through the thread. that will be super fun i'm sure.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:30 am
by Shadow_step
In post 2149, Cerberus v666 wrote:SS, Maria, Nahdia: HS/Parama? Yes/no?
Are you asking our opinion on whether they are scum or no?

There are many more scummier people who need to go first.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:31 am
by MariaR
Vedith question
I think HS's tone reminds me of equal maf the game we just played but her actions overall and posts feel scummy to me
what do you think

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:31 am
by Parama
Cerberus no offense but your "don't lynch until after intermission" is insanely stupid and I don't have the time to get into all the reasons why from phone

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:33 am
by Cerberus v666
I look forward to you digging a deep hole that I will then fill with you inside it. :)

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:36 am
by Vedith
In post 2146, Cerberus v666 wrote:Oh, parama: I'm not voting because I believe going straight to second dance before any lynches is optimal. I also don't vote much in general, so that's something you'll have to learn to live with.

@Vedith: THIS GAME IS NOT LIKE OTHER GAMES. The vig, in the scenario you described, WOULD be acting anti-town if their vig shot would also kill them. The VALUE of a vig shooting a town slot who would otherwise be a mislynch is that it SAVES TOWN from wasting the mislynch(which they have a limited number of). In the scenario where town loses TWO town slots from the vig shot thats meant to "clarify" things, town has essentially lost a mislynch, and that's what happens here when a town slot leaves the dance, dragging their town partner in tow. It doesn't MATTER that you're scumreading him. What you're doing IS NOT using a vig shot, it's using a one shot that lynches someone and kills you. Those are very different things.
I'm just a Day vigilante lover.
I wouldn't be worried about lynching/killing someone I am lovered with in a normal game if I suspect scum, why here?

I'm home, just posting. :up:

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:39 am
by Gamma Emerald
Vedith, before you leave, consider the possibility of all 4 of us being Town. We need to lynch elsewhere to see if we're being set up before we make any final calls.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:41 am
by mhsmith0
In post 2156, Gamma Emerald wrote:Vedith, before you leave, consider the possibility of all 4 of us being Town. We need to lynch elsewhere to see if we're being set up before we make any final calls.
oh, you're scum
VOTE: gamma

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:43 am
by MiniDeathStar
Lynch elsewhere *before* your pair?

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:43 am
by MiniDeathStar
Like... I can't even express how scummy that came out.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:44 am
by mhsmith0
In post 1781, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1779, Cerberus v666 wrote:Obviously the risk there is that people WON'T be able to come to accords adn we'll end up losing because town can't get their shit together and agree on a lynch.
This is my main issue. With how the dynamic between me/Vedith and MariaR/ShadowStep is, lynching in first dance IS in our best interest so we can sort some slots before we enter the crunch time of second dance.
^this was gamma's old opinion btw, now just a generic "maybe we shoudl lynch elsewhere" (while still voting SS and not pushing elsewhere)

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:44 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2157, mhsmith0 wrote:
In post 2156, Gamma Emerald wrote:Vedith, before you leave, consider the possibility of all 4 of us being Town. We need to lynch elsewhere to see if we're being set up before we make any final calls.
oh, you're scum
VOTE: gamma
I'm trying to get him to reconsider because I don't want two Town pairs dying with little scum effort because he decided to be an idiot and leave before we had all the background.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:45 am
by Parama
loooolll gamma is flailing hardcore.

Between that and the "lynch Parama/HS exclusively for info on Maria/Shadow" bs it's just desperate survivalism at this point

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:45 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2160, mhsmith0 wrote:
In post 1781, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1779, Cerberus v666 wrote:Obviously the risk there is that people WON'T be able to come to accords adn we'll end up losing because town can't get their shit together and agree on a lynch.
This is my main issue. With how the dynamic between me/Vedith and MariaR/ShadowStep is, lynching in first dance IS in our best interest so we can sort some slots before we enter the crunch time of second dance.
^this was gamma's old opinion btw, now just a generic "maybe we shoudl lynch elsewhere" (while still voting SS and not pushing elsewhere)
I am pushing elsewhere. I'm not voting elsewhere because EVERYONE'S STUCK ON THE SAME THREE WAGONS

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:47 am
by Parama
why is everyone being stuck on three wagons a bad thing

if everyone was pushing different directions it'd be impossible to make any progress at all

and there's only 8 possible wagons to begin with anyways

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:47 am
by Gamma Emerald
If Vedith does decide to be an idiot and leave PLEASE think before blindly wagoning Shadow/MariaR.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:47 am
by mhsmith0
In post 2163, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2160, mhsmith0 wrote:
In post 1781, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1779, Cerberus v666 wrote:Obviously the risk there is that people WON'T be able to come to accords adn we'll end up losing because town can't get their shit together and agree on a lynch.
This is my main issue. With how the dynamic between me/Vedith and MariaR/ShadowStep is, lynching in first dance IS in our best interest so we can sort some slots before we enter the crunch time of second dance.
^this was gamma's old opinion btw, now just a generic "maybe we shoudl lynch elsewhere" (while still voting SS and not pushing elsewhere)
I am pushing elsewhere. I'm not voting elsewhere because EVERYONE'S STUCK ON THE SAME THREE WAGONS
Yes, definitely not possible to start a new wagon and push an actual case.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:48 am
by mhsmith0
In post 2165, Gamma Emerald wrote:If Vedith does decide to be an idiot and leave PLEASE think before blindly wagoning Shadow/MariaR.
I can't even tell if he's spewing them town or wolf here though :shifty:

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:48 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2164, Parama wrote:why is everyone being stuck on three wagons a bad thing

if everyone was pushing different directions it'd be impossible to make any progress at all

and there's only 8 possible wagons to begin with anyways
BECAUSE I THINK THEY COULD BE ALL TOWN
I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT IN A FALSE DICHOTOMY/TRICHOTOMY

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:52 am
by FakeGod
VoteCount 1.7


The_Jester - MiniDeathStar [3] - pieguyn, inspectorscout, Kagami
Human Sequencer - Parama [0] -
Ser Arthur Dayne - inspectorscout [0] -
Cerberus v666 - Nahdia [0] -
mhsmith0 - pieguyn [1] - Dunnstral
Gamma Emerald - Vedith [4] - MariaR, Shadow_step, MiniDeathStar, mhsmith0
Dunnstral - Kagami [0] -
Shadow_step - MariaR [5] - Vedith, Parama, Gamma Emerald, Human Sequencer, Ser Arthur Dayne

Not Voting [3]
- The_Jester, Cerberus v666, Nahdia

With 16 alive it takes 9 votes to lynch
.

Countdown to deadline: (expired on 2016-12-12 17:00:00)

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:02 am
by Parama
I can't even

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:02 am
by Parama
What the hell have you ever

EVER

Played mafia before????

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:03 am
by Parama
"there are three competing wagons that people think contain scum. let's lynch outside of them for no good reason whatsoever"

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:03 am
by Gamma Emerald
Why are you trying to discredit my experience? I've played many games.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:04 am
by Parama
like you realize

It's a general consensus thing?

You know, the way mafia is played?