In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote: In post 2108, Ausuka wrote: In post 1703, Lavos wrote:He quickhammered Gamma when d1 was super important and had weird progression into doing it. He suspected Gamma super early d1, forgot about it and then hammered with the justification of "oh we don't need Cobbler's thoughts if gamma is scum" - yeah well what if he's town? His defense of Toranaga was suspicious regardless of Tor's alignment - he kinda just jumped into defending him and won't respond about why he was so certain that PP would have re-evaluated is read. Additionally he accused Maria of "just a naked vote that won't gain any traction so she can coast through the day on a baseless read while hoping townies start to wagon me." which a) doesn't really make any sense because I think if you want to coast through the day on a naked vote that won't get any traction, you don't exactly want people to focus on your target, and b) he is basically doing literally the exact same thing as he's accusing Maria of doing wrt/ voteparking Maria and not trying to push any wagon that will gain traction.
All of this still applies and it applies even more now that MariaR is DEAD and Dunnstral is the one who benefits from that because, guess what, she would have voted for Dunnstral today. He pretended that he didn't see the kill flip which is garbage and just a fake townslip. Why would you not read the kill flip? It's literally vital information and there is no reason to just ignore it. Dunnstral's read on Invis came out of absolutely nowhere. The push on Invis was completely artificial and generated today. In the span of eight posts he decides Invisibility is scum LITERALLY FOR PUSHING HIM WHEN HE HAD AN ENTIRE WAGON OF PEOPLE VOTING FOR HIM YESTERDAY and for coasting (which applies to almost half of the playerlist and this is more Invisibility's playstyle than actually coasting.) There is no progression before this, it's a sudden rush into voting Invis. And despite even saying Tora was guilty of the same thing, he tries to push me into voting Invis when I turn up in the thread using the logic of "no quickhammer so scum between us" - multiple people have pointed out that this isn't true already and he's just ignoring that because it's not convenient? I can't imagine it would be easy to get 5 people online at one time especially since they most likely have varying timezones, and this is an inactive game where people aren't turning up as much as usual.
In post 2102, Dunnstral wrote:speaking of which, why aren't we lynching him? He's still not getting quick lynched and there's 5 scum alive, I wonder why that is
This is playing dumb. He KNOWS about the possibility that he himself could be scum, he doesn't actually totally lack awareness of the situation.
In addition to this he was also tunneling on Maria for the entirety of d2 as an excuse to do absolutely nothing. Like, he kept acting like people were actually going to vote MariaR, which obviously wasn't the case, and complaining about how we won't consider MariaR as a wagon when it has exactly 1 member and nobody else was ever going to consider joining.
In post 1872, Dunnstral wrote:MariaR seems awfully content to sit back and let Titus get lynched considering she apparently knows I'm scum
This is outstandingly hypocritical considering that even though the Maria wagon was obviously never going to happen, Dunn just said "oh let's vote Maria!" as if that was going to get anything done.
This read on NM totally disappeared here. He also pushed NM a bit later, here:
But apparently voting Invis out of nowhere is the better option.
What's so good about the Invis wagon then? Irrelephant, for all your talk of my vote on Dunn being a "bad vote" and me being scum for it, there's no reason for your vote given at all, and it seemingly came out of absolutely nowhere at all, other than suspecting Toranaga for flaking? Flaking isn't a scum strategy, that's not how it works. If you flake, you cannot win. Your replacement is part of the game, you aren't. It is not a strategical move. Mafia are not going to flake to advance their win condition. Not to mention the fact that Tora and Dunn could easily be scum together. If you believe scum only bus when it's totally optimal you are flat out wrong and the only thing from either of them that really comes close to real bussing is Tora's "let's lynch Dunn for Maria" at the start of d3. And even then he would've known that wouldn't actually happen!
Okay I started by trying to snip this post to make it easier to respond to but it's already got a lot going on so here are just my thoughts:
In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote:
-To start, Purrcocet has already joined the dunnstral wagon, so you basically have to decide between Tora and dunnstral being scum here (unless you think purrcocet is going in hard on a scumbuddy in lylo)
Yeah and I've chosen Dunn.
In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote:
-You're 100% misrepping my case on Tora. You make it sound like I was like "Oh tora replaced out? Must be scum" when the replace-out is 0% of my case.
but you said it was scum-indicative for him though.
In post 2124, Irrelephant11 wrote:
I think I would still be willing to vote Tor-slot? I just finished a game with Toranaga and his postcount here is absolutely AI.
In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote:
I think Tora's votes have been opportunistic (was on both wagons with basically no reasons)
This isn't necessarily scummier than being on both wagons while giving reasons for it and "opportunistic" isn't really a good scumtell? Any scum can form reasons if they want to, and this is the same reasoning you used against me in Watchmen Wanted and what you used on Titus earlier. Besides, Chickadee was also on both wagons and didn't really have any reasoning for that.
This means nothing unless you elaborate on what you mean by it.
I mean like if someone is nightkilled swearing that someone else is scum it really isn't a horrible idea to follow the dead person.
In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote:
Not to mention his laissez faire attitude was basically openwolfing given how he refused to internalize the importance of early lynches in this setup even as a bunch of people explained it to him
Except people were actively following that attitude and the only one who mentioned this pre-Gamma lynch was me? and like I didn't do it in an incredibly obvious way and I can sort of see how you miss that. Also again I was pushing this yesterday and if you believe it's scummy I don't understand why you refused to vote Toranaga yesterday? Like you just didn't consider it and even went to find a new wagon, and if these points are so compelling to you I don't get why you ignored them yesterday. Today would be much easier if we had lynched Tora over Titus.
In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote:
--> As a sub-point, "MariaR died so Dunnstral has to be scum" is like the most WIFOM-y thing you could say about the nightkill here. Assume dunnstral is town and you are scum for a second. What would be the easiest mislynch you could get here by using the nightkill effectively?
I kill anyone and win the game probably. Nobody actually does NKA which has been proven by everyone collectively ignoring Maria's death. And you're failing to consider that it's LYLO- i.e if I want Dunn dead I leave Maria alive so she can vote Dunn, then scum quickhammer and win.
In post 2153, Irrelephant11 wrote:
-My vote on Invis did not come from out of nowhere. I've clearly been acting on some false assumptions, including townreading both dunnstral and invis (I seriously doubt both are town here), so I've been re-evaluating. Invis' play has basically been "tunneling" in the exact same way you're describing dunnstral's "tunnel" on MariaR. The difference fmpov is that
--> A) dunnstral's felt more personal, and therefore more understandable
Tbh I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
Penguin and Dunn also jumped on the Gamma wagon for little to no reason. Why is Invis in particular scummy for this? You could also say this about pretty much anyone who jumped on Titus because they were bored or whatever.
Besides I think Invis being blank is sorta a stylistic thing? Like I don't think that Invis as town would be spewing logically backed content and four paragraphs to go with every vote he makes.
after writing all that out it occurred to me that dunnstral/invis both being conf!50/50 t/s is actually not really that helpful of information, because all of you are conf!50/50 t/s given this is lylo. I hate this game day and am prepared to complain about this setup lots post-game[/quote]