Mafiascum.net

I would do a wall giving each outstanding player in mafiascum.net a fitting greek god title but i think i've already shitposted enough tbh

later i guess

In post 1898, the worst wrote:

In post 1860, Egix96 wrote:

In post 1819, Bingle wrote:Wicked is pretty obvtown by fogey standards.

Would you be able to expand on this? I've spent the last ~1.5 hours looking through his ISO and I still can't get a good read on him.

wait you spent an hour and a half looking through his ISO and... had no original thoughts at all worth sharing with the class? you keeping a note pt or something? (if so nice work but you still need to post itt!)

I did find these two snippets slightly towny:

In post 119, Wickedestjr wrote:the worst, why are you opting to keep your Nibbui scum read close to the vest? I'm curious what you're trying to accomplish with that vote, if anything.

In post 211, Wickedestjr wrote:And, for the record, this is mostly why I'm still voting for the worst. He's someone that I expected to be helping push the game forward. But instead he is sitting on his naked vote from page 3 and isn't making much effort to sort Nibbui or convince others to support him. It's just enough to make it look like he's scumhunting without actually adding any momentum to the discussion.

But for the rest, I was just constantly hitting a wall and not knowing what to make of it. I know that's not going to impress anyone but I'm just as disappointed myself as you probably are.

hi evildoer codename
what's up

you should prob evolve to Arcanine btw

i already extensively talked to fire about doing the same

stone evolutions are underrated.

i would engage with you but i'm ~lazy~ and honestly by this point just am pretty confident you're simply scum so yeah

not worth it :'/

In post 1974, Menalque wrote:is nsg known for being particularly good as scum as well as town or just as town?

When I was scum with her in Alt9p, she made some decent posts early on but then... idk, either she flaked or she just went into anti-spew
Bottom line is she stopped posting after she started getting scumread

In post 2152, Fumuki wrote:hi evildoer codename

uggly dog

what's up

You mean good townie angel boy, codename, Lazy Dog

I'm just catching up here really.

In post 2153, Fumuki wrote:you should prob evolve to Arcanine btw

I would rather bring Itchy back than do that tbh

In post 2157, Egix96 wrote:

In post 2153, Fumuki wrote:you should prob evolve to Arcanine btw

I would rather bring Itchy back than do that tbh

i was always the oddbal kid that liked the underrated evolutions i guess

like

i enjoy more raichu than pikachu and everyone is always going "wtf?" about that

In post 2156, Egix96 wrote:

In post 2152, Fumuki wrote:hi evildoer codename

uggly dog

what's up

You mean good townie angel boy, codename, Lazy Dog

In post 2107, the worst wrote:hot take: nsg needs to be introduced to the scumpool, but

should absolutely not be touched today

.

{bingle, egix, wicked} are the best wagons

Why is NSG a virgin to you?

Well, since I see this is not going to die.....

post 2093, Nibbui"]

In post 2086, teacher wrote:than an actual scum-case (I find XXX scummy because ....). Like most of your case seems to be questioning the genuineness of my reads of them; the only time you call something scummy ('appearing to solve') is my withholding a read on you.

just gonna for last say that this is very bs imo.

i organized it in a question-like/inquiry structure, but that's just how i operate.

I could call scummy ......

I just didn't use such a structure because i don't like it very much.[/quote]
1242 + 1718 = tell me more about how you don’t like the casing structure and prefer the questioning structure.

Well, since I see this is not going to die.....

In post 2093, Nibbui wrote:

In post 2086, teacher wrote:than an actual scum-case (I find XXX scummy because ....). Like most of your case seems to be questioning the genuineness of my reads of them; the only time you call something scummy ('appearing to solve') is my withholding a read on you.

just gonna for last say that this is very bs imo.

i organized it in a question-like/inquiry structure, but that's just how i operate.

I could call scummy ......

I just didn't use such a structure because i don't like it very much.

1242 + 1718 = tell me more about how you don’t like the casing structure and prefer the questioning structure.

*EBWOP

casing to other people read/non-real time interactions = "this is X for Y"

casing engaging the person i'm scum reading because i wasn't confident BEFORE that said person was scum = questioning structure

Contradiction 2

In post 2131, Nibbui wrote:Your posts were mostly questions too instead of analyzing content already in the posts and trying to sort from there. You seem to ask for more and more info but i don't see you doing anything useful with it.

In post 2093, Nibbui wrote:I could call scummy the fact that you don't seem to ever entertain scum!skitt for the reasons i talked about.

i could call scummy the fact that you were saying "someone help me read nibbui" in early game and later when i called you out, you give me a town read while you were in your catch-up still in early game.

i could call scummy you overreacting with a hard-stance like "lynch me to prove that it's towny".

Either Im asking questions and not taking stances, OR my stances are scummy. You really cant have it both ways.

teacher, you're never town here after this post.

It's hard to understand that i meant you aren't taking many stances in analyzing posts/intent or sorting slots fast but that you took a random blown-out stance of "lynch me".

You are trying to egg on this convo. My read wasn't wrong apparently.

Contradiction 3

In post 2131, Nibbui wrote:I NEVER SAID THAT YOU SHOULD STOP

You’re right, you never used the word stop. But kindly do tell me how ANY of the below should not be taken to mean stop?

In post 2079, Nibbui wrote:
this back and forth is just pointless tbh
….

p-eddit: gonna read that wall in a bit but i doubt it's worth it

In post 2089, Nibbui wrote:i don't think so but i don't want to sit here and keep discussing with the "cased" person

In post 2090, Nibbui wrote:i think there's p much nothing more to be said here from my part?

i'm gonna active lurk a bit

In post 2108, Nibbui wrote:he seems more interested in keep going at the pointless convo than to stop getting sidetracked and sort other slots.

In post 2120, Nibbui wrote:i do care if you find a priority to keep engaging me in pointless stuff instead

So "you never told me to stop" spewing my alignment? You made quite clear you were not interested in the conversation, even though you thought it made me obviously scum?? That, my friend, is absurd.

I didn't think that the first time i voted you, the fact you were trying to chat was "spewing your alignment". What i think spewed your alignment was to keep going/insisting at it by distorting things in a silly way like you're doing right now.

i'm just gonna walk away from this bc it's pointless

i'm convinced enough that you're scum, more than Egix or Wicked.

When other people catch up i try to alliance they up and lynch you

i don't think i'm wrong but if i'm, sorry, however what you did here was always always always scummy.

In post 2167, Nibbui wrote:What i think spewed your alignment was to keep going/insisting at it by distorting things in a silly way like you're doing right now.

I am just quoting your words. I close with the same question I asked in 2104 - was there any other interpretation of the ACTUAL WORDS you typed? Like sure, you meant something else (I dont feel like lynching you), but thats not what you typed. My posts have quotes and links for a reason -- to prevent the exact distortion you are referring to. You may know what you meant, but Im quoting what you said.

As for insisting on keeping it going/getting sidetracked, like tw said, it takes two to tango. You alone kept it going at times -- signing off in 2090 and coming back in 2093, then coming back this morning with 2137. Like no, Im not willing to let a post I strongly disagree with have the last word. You arent either. You arent able to call our shared character flaw scummy in me while claiming town leader

I have to get my kids back. Since you seem so focused on the sidetracking thing, why dont you look at 1926 calling out my deadline and see if you think our conversation really stopped me, or you want to contradict yourself on that shade too.

In post 2169, Nibbui wrote:i don't think i'm

wrong

but if

i'm

, sorry, however what you did here was always always always scummy.

this is honestly just too rich.

See, the implied object of "i'm" here is wrong. Thats how English works.

In post 2084, Nibbui wrote:i still think that you can easily be scum here for the reasons i mentioned though

i don't particularly feel you're rn

In post 2084, Nibbui wrote:i still think that you can easily be

scum

here for the reasons i mentioned though

i don't particularly feel

you're

rn

But when I apply the same grammar to try to interpret 2084, I suddenly become the scummiest person on the PL?

(Why I keep going on this is because the miscommunication was so F'ing obvious to outsiders, I dont get why you cant see it fmpov. But you cant, which makes me question if youre even trying to honestly sort me.)

In post 2091, teacher wrote:Kindly answer about sheeping and the above questions.

I don't particularly have a stance on sheeping. If there's too much of it it's bad. It makes the sheep harder to read. It's mostly just a thing that exists that you deal with.

I used to be violently antisheeping.

Also, yeah, I think instigating a fight with skitter has made scumhunting easier. There's definitely more to talk about since it happened, and I think largely the new conversations have more substance.

sidebar: ducky, skitt and I still need that hydra name for us

boom, pagetop