Mafiascum.net

In post 1008, PenguinPower wrote:I don't really care about your approval or thoughts on what I want to do

Pedit: you'll do

Oh sure. Let’s not take a firm stance on something we think is scummy because people on forum mafia are not readily available to discuss.

You.have.a.vote

I want to elim dave

The pedit was for skitter in case that wasn't clear, in the hurry to hit submit.

what do u wanna talk about?

I mean - I wasn't seeking your approval there? I find lack of taking a stance to be scummy.

And apparently I will vote people I find scummy...unlike you.

I am also still here if I was being references

I agree with best bird boi on the stance taking thing although apparently that makes me an "illogical"

2143 -- is thinking that kind of thing comes from scum reasonable?

no

My dear Best Bird,

In post 2126, the worst wrote:Deadline: 6 days, 22 hours, 16 minutes

I'd rather not get to E-1 again right away when we have plenty of time to catch the whole scumteam.
<-- never assume he's not thinking...

In post 2159, TheGoldenParadox wrote:no

Don't think I was soliciting input from the subject of the investigation...

In post 2155, Best Bird wrote:I mean - I wasn't seeking your approval there? I find lack of taking a stance to be scummy.

Apparently it wasn't obvious that I was throwing your words back at you. I don't care if you think discussion before possibly triggering a premature end to the day is scummy.

In post 2143, davesaz wrote:I think TGP may have scumtold a couple times in the last 2-3 pages of my catchup. It involves the subtle difference between "x is something I'd do as town" and "y is something I'd do instead of x as scum" where y is the thing that wasn't done.

can you reword this or say it another way?

it's a little hard for me to parse the way it's written

In post 2158, davesaz wrote:2143 -- is thinking that kind of thing comes from scum reasonable?

I think so, but I personally would've waited to see if you kept shading that slot without voting before I would've outright called it scummy, because that is 100% scum behaviour.

Like I do think best bird called it a bit prematurely but the thought process is definitely right

In post 2162, davesaz wrote:

In post 2155, Best Bird wrote:I mean - I wasn't seeking your approval there? I find lack of taking a stance to be scummy.

Apparently it wasn't obvious that I was throwing your words back at you. I don't care if you think discussion before possibly triggering a premature end to the day is scummy.

Nah, I got it. I wanted you to say it. Your translation is incorrect. I think shading a slot without voting it is scummy which is what you’ve done.

But sitting on an unvote is surely productive...so keep that up.

i don't mind it too much tbh

That’s fine. I do.

In post 2127, TheGoldenParadox wrote:dgb was essentially a guaranteed lim, and if i were scum i would just hard defend her instead of being on that lim

This thing, which is essentially saying:

town would be on this DGB lim, scum would hard defend her but that's not what I (TGP) did
which is the pattern "town would do x where scum would do y but I did x" and in a town mindset you don't put it that way.

Pretty sure there is at least one other post where the same type of logic is used.

Sitting on a vanity vote near deadline is pretty productive.

In post 2171, davesaz wrote:

In post 2127, TheGoldenParadox wrote:dgb was essentially a guaranteed lim, and if i were scum i would just hard defend her instead of being on that lim

This thing, which is essentially saying:

town would be on this DGB lim, scum would hard defend her but that's not what I (TGP) did
which is the pattern "town would do x where scum would do y but I did x" and in a town mindset you don't put it that way.

Pretty sure there is at least one other post where the same type of logic is used.

I've certainly seen town do that before

In post 2135, Best Bird wrote:

tgp

Make you case instead of just whispering someone's name.