Mafiascum.net

u are so fucking bad taylor if u are town here like really terrible. grudge tunnels are not a good look

i think theres a chance that both are town but in that case i dunno why dgb would out.

In post 2150, DkKoba wrote:u are so fucking bad taylor if u are town here like really terrible. grudge tunnels are not a good look

thats not acceptable language. please dont be a bully.

In post 2149, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2147, Tayl0r Swift wrote:either way koba hopping on after the claim is a bad look, so VOTE: koba for now.

u really think that claim was towny?

yes. i think if theres someone claiming a guilty its fine to claim early. someone had even asked for a claim iirc.

says the person using literally anything i say as a "scumclaim" and refusing to critically read the thread. ur reads are not logical or make sense at all. like u clearly have an agenda to miselim me.

In post 2117, DrippingGoofball wrote:The dead player was a danger to

In post 2118, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Infinity234

DIE SCUM DIE

In post 2120, DrippingGoofball wrote:Result

In post 2131, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 2122, Infinity 324 wrote:Well I'm town so

Oh

I'll take your word for it, the mod probably made a mistake.

sounds more like u are paranoid that it was a guilty and TMI'd to that conclusion bc i dont see a guilty anywhere

perhaps just accept ive been around the block a few times in the game of mafia and can smell bullshit while you think you can stick like glue to someone and get a free miselim by constantly misrepping them.

In post 2120, DrippingGoofball wrote:Result

result implying scum is a guilty result.

Evening all ,

My reaction on catching up with D2 so far



I've just worked a 12-8 shift, so pretty frazzled but will provide some quick thoughts and then more tomorrow.

In post 2158, Marky Mark wrote:Evening all ,

My reaction on catching up with D2 so far



I've just worked a 12-8 shift, so pretty frazzled but will provide some quick thoughts and then more tomorrow.

no answer to my question?

In post 2157, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2120, DrippingGoofball wrote:Result

result implying scum is a guilty result.

my sweet summer child.

In post 2117, DrippingGoofball wrote:The dead player was a danger to

To whom? I don't quite follow what you are trying to say here (sorry!)

In post 2130, DkKoba wrote:@mark whats 2x2+25-9?

20 I guess if we apply the conventional operator order. Why do you ask?

In post 2134, VP Baltar wrote:Will say, weird Koba didn't die after soft claiming power.

Pure WIFOM IMO - I don't see what the value is of bringing it up at this point in proceedings

In post 2144, DkKoba wrote:VOTE: infinity

nice scummy early claim

Why is that scummy? - I'm not experienced with PR optimal plays but it seems like this is good for transparency (ie he's not waited for DGB to ellaborate and then claim something that fits with the detail). I'm not defending him either, I just think its NAI.

In post 2160, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2157, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2120, DrippingGoofball wrote:Result

result implying scum is a guilty result.

my sweet summer child.

do you see how you arent saying anything constructive but only shading and insulting me?

In post 2150, DkKoba wrote:u are so fucking bad taylor if u are town here like really terrible. grudge tunnels are not a good look

I don't want to minimod here but this is a naked personal attack. This is supposed to be a game and there ought to be no place for posts like this on this forum. Let's all respect each other

In post 2162, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2160, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2157, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2120, DrippingGoofball wrote:Result

result implying scum is a guilty result.

my sweet summer child.

do you see how you arent saying anything constructive but only shading and insulting me?

do i need to make a quote wall to show how much of a hypocrite you are

Let's not get bogged down in who said what - can we all just try to get along going forwards and take the personal stuff out of it please? Will be a lot more fun for all parties that way

So infinity has claimed, the logical thing here seems to be for DGB to elaborate on whether his claim could be plausible (eg she was a tracker and tracked him to FL) or whether what she knows solidly proves him to be scum.

DGB literally never claimed. why are ppl even bothering assuming they did

In post 2148, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 2146, Almost50 wrote:UNVOTE:

Just as a precaution. If DGB retracts I am going to vote her. If she sticks to the claim I am going to be confuzzled as to which of the two to believe.

If DGB confirms, it's true.

I always think outside the box (some call it moon!logic). Let's say scum have a Role Cop, and they targeted Infinity. They now know that this is an Investigative role, so why nor sacrifice one of them in exchange of eliminating the Investigative? Uncommon and unlikely, but possible non-the-less

In post 2166, DkKoba wrote:DGB literally never claimed. why are ppl even bothering assuming they did

I'm not sure anyone did - afaik they just revealed that they had a result on infinity that led them to believe infinity was scum

Assuming 2155 was a joke btw but as far as I can tell from the wiki, it doesn't look like paranoid cop would be a Normal role

@A50 - we don't need to theorycraft at this stage IMO - we can see what DBG wants to share in response and go from there.

i literally quoted every post from dgb from today. where is the guilty claim

In post 2166, DkKoba wrote:DGB literally never claimed. why are ppl even bothering assuming they did

What do you call "result" then?? You think she meant "I predict that there will be a result from someone else"?

In post 2169, Marky Mark wrote:@A50 - we don't need to theorycraft at this stage IMO - we can see what DBG wants to share in response and go from there.

I can't help it. It's the way my mind works. I can "tone it down" (as in not broadcast it) though

i think its a very long reach to think its a report claim. town pr(or town in general) would ask for verification of result if its actually a guilty.

In post 2173, DkKoba wrote:i think its a very long reach to think its a report claim. town pr(or town in general) would ask for verification of result if its actually a guilty.

You could potentially be right TBF - IMO if it was a reaction test then DGB doubling down on her vote in 2131 doesn't make much sense though.

Would be good to hear from DGB herself on this to clear it up