Mafiascum.net

In post 2032, Purple Heart wrote:

Infinity/Gamma

can you BOTH validate this account?

Yep, murder did a bunch of solving, and me and murder basically talked about how to out-wine the scum.

1)

1109 Paranoia EoD was directed at half of the plist even though he kept with the

OWER

vote. 1313

Yeah I had TRs on murder, tracy, and flea at the time so outworlder made sense

(The change from 1583 EoD1 of that slot being potential town to now also pings me.)

The fuck? This was wine, I literally said I was wining a couple posts earlier. I wanted scum to send tracy to do the kill

3)

Murder

was in his council but

Infinity

, while seeming to work with him a lot here 1718 1768 1778 1810 etc..., is not forming council involving

Murder

. 1906 This is a very weak point and the most recent one, maybe this is confbias, but it's something that vexes me specifically. I don't know what my other head thinks here.

Murder is my 3rd strongest TR but I'm not 100% sure on him yet.

My take on your progression here was around the fact that it was a unique reply to the 1v1 as nobody else had considered it TvT at the time. I agree that it was one of my weaker reasons to townread you, but my issue is that you didn't look at the rest of the sentence when you commented on it.

I guess I just don't agree that the context makes it more likely to be town. I looked at the rest of the sentence, but I didn't comment on it because it didn't seem relevant.

The bolded feels icky to me because you don't seem to be evaluating my posts unless it suits your read based on

Ali

or on

Koba

, and that's an easy angle to push without having to explain yourself.

Look, all 3 of you share the same alignment. If I see scummy things from your slot, that makes me more likely to think you are scum. Whether it be from alisae, or koba, or you. I am evaluating your posts, just in the context of you having to share an alignment with ali/koba.

I'm not asking for a huge wall debunking or 1v1ing

Alisae

on their case 1781 but you're not addressing it even though you targeted their read progression and this was a big shift to it. 1849

I addressed it in 1797, and I'm not going to address it more than that. The case doesn't explain the read progression because it came out of nowhere after both of you were TRing me for almost all of d1. It looks like ali was justifying a SR on me in order to discredit my SR on your slot.

2016, I don't follow your take, you're mainly just requoting mine and

Ali's

posts.

Um, they're all bad reasons to TR/not elim tracy