Mafiascum.net

In post 2147, quiet wrote:

In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.

Is it worth outing a PR to catch scum? Is there a guarantee that there is only one Tracker PR? Cause if we can use this to sort NM sooner than waiting for that weak every other night BS, I'm all for it.

An exact Claim by two players is quite uncommon. So it depends on the situation. It might not be necessary if the bad PR claim simply goes through. But if you need to make it happen, 1 Scum is far more valuable than 1 Town, even a PR in my opinion (and particularly something as hard to get right as a Tracker).

i got more vote in a day and a half then anyone got in the previous week, do u guys really think that scum was not piling on me?

just vote me already.

In post 2150, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2147, quiet wrote:

In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.

Is it worth outing a PR to catch scum? Is there a guarantee that there is only one Tracker PR? Cause if we can use this to sort NM sooner than waiting for that weak every other night BS, I'm all for it.

An exact Claim by two players is quite uncommon. So it depends on the situation. It might not be necessary if the bad PR claim simply goes through. But if you need to make it happen, 1 Scum is far more valuable than 1 Town, even a PR in my opinion (and particularly something as hard to get right as a Tracker).

It doesn’t apply here obviously but yes in theory, I would have absolutely outted if the pressure began to decline on a player that put out my exact same Role.

In post 2138, Bypasser Catcher wrote:gamma

step back


realize ur tryign to way too big brain what is right in front of you.

nero has way too many logical inconsistencies with their actions vs their words at this point to say they are town.

I think enough of them feel like they make sense within my understanding of him to look past them

What are we at?

In post 2154, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2138, Bypasser Catcher wrote:gamma

step back


realize ur tryign to way too big brain what is right in front of you.

nero has way too many logical inconsistencies with their actions vs their words at this point to say they are town.

I think enough of them feel like they make sense within my understanding of him to look past them

k his claim is still major scummy

In post 2155, Andresvmb wrote:What are we at?

E-1

(its E-2 but not_mafia exists)

even a player like NM, where you expect them to get elimmed in a day or two when they can't prove either of their trolly claims?
(sorry NM if they aren't trolly claims)

In post 2153, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2150, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2147, quiet wrote:

In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.

Is it worth outing a PR to catch scum? Is there a guarantee that there is only one Tracker PR? Cause if we can use this to sort NM sooner than waiting for that weak every other night BS, I'm all for it.

An exact Claim by two players is quite uncommon. So it depends on the situation. It might not be necessary if the bad PR claim simply goes through. But if you need to make it happen, 1 Scum is far more valuable than 1 Town, even a PR in my opinion (and particularly something as hard to get right as a Tracker).

It doesn’t apply here obviously but yes in theory, I would have absolutely outted if the pressure began to decline on a player that put out my exact same Role.

if not outted, doubled down on the read and tried to force it back onto NM, NOT onto Luca.

Or, even myself.

In post 2158, quiet wrote:even a player like NM, where you expect them to get elimmed in a day or two when they can't prove either of their trolly claims?
(sorry NM if they aren't trolly claims)

Why do you say this?

scummy =/= scum
I feel like you should just let me be on this. You don't need to stop pushing Nero but I'm doing my own thing that I'd like to figure out if I'm right about or not, I don't want you trying to talk me out of it at every point.

no.

when i say scummy

i mean .

alignm,ent indicative scummy.

not that bullshit ass yee yee shit ppl say when someone says something wrong.

In post 2160, Bypasser Catcher wrote:Or, even myself.

It was a fake claim made out of frustration this conversation is obviously theoretical.

In post 2163, Bypasser Catcher wrote:no.

when i say scummy

i mean .

alignm,ent indicative scummy.

not that bullshit ass yee yee shit ppl say when someone says something wrong.

okay. What's the scum motive for the claim when it sticks out like a sore thumb, and he retracted it pretty quickly after?

N_M can't feel human emotions such as frustration.

In post 2166, NorwegianboyEE wrote:N_M can't feel human emotions such as frustration.

I was talking about Nero but yes this statement is accurate.

What Bypasser said makes sense to me. I could understand not claiming then, operating under the assumption that NM would get elimmed pretty inevitably in a day or two if they had faked the claim (and i'm like, 85% sure that is the world we are living in), but putting pressure back on NM or someone else makes more sense that what actually went down.

In post 2165, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2163, Bypasser Catcher wrote:no.

when i say scummy

i mean .

alignm,ent indicative scummy.

not that bullshit ass yee yee shit ppl say when someone says something wrong.

okay. What's the scum motive for the claim when it sticks out like a sore thumb, and he retracted it pretty quickly after?

because suckers like you buy it and think "oh this is how town would react here it cant be scum"

recognize lolcatting when it happens pls

Titus, does this feel like that other game to you, where all the town PRs just gave up and voted themselves?

sorry bad word choice.

but the point is like its bait to get ppl who have that mindset of "wow this is so outrageous it cant be scum"

In post 2125, Bypasser Catcher wrote:he's lolcatting

Please don't use MU terms

In post 2169, Bypasser Catcher wrote:

In post 2165, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2163, Bypasser Catcher wrote:no.

when i say scummy

i mean .

alignm,ent indicative scummy.

not that bullshit ass yee yee shit ppl say when someone says something wrong.

okay. What's the scum motive for the claim when it sticks out like a sore thumb, and he retracted it pretty quickly after?

because suckers like you buy it and think "oh this is how town would react here it cant be scum"

recognize lolcatting when it happens pls

idk I'll need to get a better picture of the exact situation when it happened but I feel like his defeatist attitude is a bit overwrought for scum atp

In post 2170, Rannygazoo wrote:Titus, does this feel like that other game to you, where all the town PRs just gave up and voted themselves?

you've seen people claim PRs early before.