Page 88 of 165

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:40 pm
by zMuffinMan
really? coz last i checked you had ssk as town for one post and you were saying to nacho that his later play looking scummy was countered solely by that one post?

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:43 pm
by Selkies
In post 2175, zMuffinMan wrote:really? coz last i checked you had ssk as town for one post and you were saying to nacho that his later play looking scummy was countered solely by that one post?
Orcinus thought he looked scummy. I put our vote on GF near the start of day 2 and didn't take up Nacho's SSK wagon, though I did give it some thought.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:45 pm
by zMuffinMan
In post 1472, Selkies wrote:
In post 1468, Nachomamma8 wrote:now can we lynch ssk together, ffery?
I want to know what orcinus thinks about it. I can see SSK stepping up his game in honor of Nati's triumphant return to modding.
In post 1482, Selkies wrote:
In post 1480, Nachomamma8 wrote:which post was it?
. That whole exchange between Four Trouble and SSK was good, though.

p-edit. Yeah the Empking post in the JS micro was one of the posts/games I was thinking about.
In post 1516, Selkies wrote:ssk looks like too easy a vote, and i am still having a hard time believing his day 1 play could be scum
so all the posts about mafiassk were orcinus, including that one you mentioned #140 as the main reason for the town read?

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:45 pm
by zMuffinMan
hmm didn't meant to quote those but yeah i'm going through and checking what you were saying about mafiassk and trying to figure out who is saying what

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:47 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
no, i thought ssk looked scummy for recent posts, but i didn't really push him because i thought his day 1 play wasn't bad, and his wagon was too easy and i wanted to look at other people first

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:47 pm
by fferyllt
No, I was in the middle of that discussion, and I did think about Nacho's case. The posts you quoted there show that. They also show I wasn't really feeling an SSK vote.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:48 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
WE BOTH FAIL

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:48 pm
by Selkies
In post 2180, fferyllt wrote:really feeling
cooking and posting don't mix.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:02 pm
by Cabd
This is the part where you fuckers massclaim.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:10 pm
by Guyett
I am vt

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:13 pm
by Natirasha
Vote Count 2.26

MafiaSSK(0):

Cabd(0):

Selkies(5):
MafiaSSK, Bert, Aronis, notscience, The Goodfather
zMuffinMan(0):

notscience(0):

The Goodfather(2):
Selkies, Cabd
Nachomamma8(0):

Bert(0):

Aronis(1):
Idiotking
Idiotking(1):
Nachomamma8
Guyett(0):

No Lynch(0):


Not Voting(2):
zMuffinMan, Guyett

With eleven alive, it takes six to lynch.

Deadline:
(expired on 2014-02-19 21:00:00)

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:13 pm
by Natirasha
.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:29 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 2167, The Goodfather wrote:at the time nacho's post style was new to me.

Many consecutive messages in short succession; lots of what seemed like inside jokes that i couldn't understand; and lackluster reads

If you want to know my role so badly i'll claim and just let the cards fall where they may.

i'm a town nurse/back up doctor
Woo I am so so dead tonight.
But at least town will still maybe have a doc.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:29 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 2173, Cabd wrote:Scumdoc, town nurse, town vig.... Sounds utterly like something nati would do.
What the hell, Cabd? I'm scum? Why, exactly?

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:34 pm
by notscience
In post 2188, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 2173, Cabd wrote:Scumdoc, town nurse, town vig.... Sounds utterly like something nati would do.
What the hell, Cabd? I'm scum? Why, exactly?
your role pm reads scum


I dunno, that claim kinda makes sense in retrospect from GF.

:s

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:37 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 2189, notscience wrote:
In post 2188, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 2173, Cabd wrote:Scumdoc, town nurse, town vig.... Sounds utterly like something nati would do.
What the hell, Cabd? I'm scum? Why, exactly?
your role pm reads scum


I dunno, that claim kinda makes sense in retrospect from GF.

:s
Granted it could also be perfectly as well that scum is using my claim to clear GF at least some.

But that's probably only if Selkies turns out town. Which they won't.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:39 pm
by notscience
Didn't you guys fakeclaim nurse in 1509?

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:51 pm
by zMuffinMan
mafiassk wrote:Granted it could also be perfectly as well that scum is using my claim to clear GF at least some
considering he was softing it (or at least severely limiting what he could fake claim) well before you claimed doc, i don't think so

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:14 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 2192, zMuffinMan wrote:
mafiassk wrote:Granted it could also be perfectly as well that scum is using my claim to clear GF at least some
considering he was softing it (or at least severely limiting what he could fake claim) well before you claimed doc, i don't think so
See, I have never understood softclaims. They just go right past my head. But alright.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:42 pm
by zMuffinMan
i just realised you never claimed a n1 protect

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:06 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 2194, zMuffinMan wrote:i just realised you never claimed a n1 protect
You're never going to guess.
Alright, I'll tell you.
Selkies. Because, ffery.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:07 pm
by MafiaSSK
In post 2195, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 2194, zMuffinMan wrote:i just realised you never claimed a n1 protect
You're never going to guess.
Alright, I'll tell you.
Selkies. Because, ffery.
But this was before I realized just how batshit scummy they were. I liked them Day 1. But not anymore.

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:27 pm
by zMuffinMan
In post 1141, MafiaSSK wrote:I think I'll trust Cabd here in the spirit of NatMod. And if this goes like AA, well then, yeah.

VOTE: Selkies

Prove your towniness, Selkies!
this is your first d2 post

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:31 pm
by Idiotking
Ok,

Unvote

Vote MafiaSSK


That is total and utter bullshit. You voted Selkies twice early on, and never stated a townread on them. You started D2 swinging immediately, by that I mean you voted Selkies within 1 page of the start of D2 and stayed for pretty much forever. If you were just coming off of protecting him,
why would you do that?

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:31 pm
by Idiotking
...er, yeah, what Muffin said.