Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:37 am**

In post 2174, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 2173, Titus wrote:
In post 2165, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm in favor of most Sick counters considering I believe he's a ML.
And this is why I feel no one listens. It's not so much that you townread Sick but rather it doesn't match what you think you know.

The only difference between that and my approach is that I am open and it tells people what they can do.
I'm like the only one doing this I'm pretty sure most people are in favor of it

Then why does Varsoon want to pursue fake claim lynches, or Lapsa stage a diversion, or half the other garbage in the thread?

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:38 am**

In post 2152, Wake1 wrote:
In post 2151, Dunnstral wrote:We're not lynching performer today

Lynches:
Vedith
Sickofit
A50
Lapsa

Policy lynches:
Peregrine
Airick10
Why policy lynch those two?

They need pressure and they need to engage.

Should they be alive Day 2 and aren't active or logging in but doing nothing then yeah I feel they'd be viable options.

I think they had plenty time to engage.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:38 am**

There's resistance but not of the Sick is town variety.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:39 am**

This Sickofit1138 situation is very telling. There's TMI here going on.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:40 am**

Titus wrote:
In post 2169, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 2166, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 2165, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm in favor of most Sick counters considering I believe he's a ML.
You don't really have a reason to believe that though
Except you don't know that so don't fucking say it

Wake88 wrote:So now Zach absolutely refuses to vote Sickofit1138 and wants Vedith lynched.

I feel like at least one of Dunnstral/Zach/Titus is Scum, based on the constant flip-flopping. It's a severe lack of consistency.
Maybe Wake is scum. Notice how he leaves Varsoon out despite the total lack of scumhunting by Varsoon minus the mason claim.

christ i'm going to fucking shoot myself

hello i've been AGAINST sickofit's lynch since BEFORE THE MASON CLAIM SHIT STARTED WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU

Titus wrote:
In post 2174, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 2173, Titus wrote:
In post 2165, Zachstralkita wrote:I'm in favor of most Sick counters considering I believe he's a ML.
And this is why I feel no one listens. It's not so much that you townread Sick but rather it doesn't match what you think you know.

The only difference between that and my approach is that I am open and it tells people what they can do.
I'm like the only one doing this I'm pretty sure most people are in favor of it
Then why does Varsoon want to pursue fake claim lynches, or Lapsa stage a diversion, or half the other garbage in the thread?

These would hold weight to me if I thought Varsoon was scum. I don't.

Varsoon wanted to lynch Dunnstral from the get-go, tbh. I feel like he's blinded by something because I'm also sure Dunn is town.

I'll ISO Lapsa.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:43 am**

Zach: Lapsa is town

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:45 am**

Dunnstral wrote:Zach: Lapsa is town

you said lapsa is town too...

im not sure why me re evaluating things is such a fucking SHOCKER to you

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:46 am**

And Wake drop that crap with telling everybody how they need to engage more. They aren't going to start engaging more because you told them to.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:46 am**

In post 2151, Dunnstral wrote:We're not lynching performer today

Lynches:
Vedith
Sickofit
A50
Lapsa

Policy lynches:
Peregrine
Airick10

When did Lapsa become town to you?

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:50 am**

In post 2183, Titus wrote:When did Lapsa become town to you?

That's my lynch list

Lapsa was town early game but fell off hard

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:52 am**

In post 2180, Dunnstral wrote:Zach: Lapsa is town

But he's town now?

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:55 am**

In post 2182, Boem_u_dusi wrote:And Wake drop that crap with telling everybody how they need to engage more. They aren't going to start engaging more because you told them to.

If I feel they need to engage more then I will say so, so your request is denied.

If they refuse to engage when they are able to then they will take responsibility for it as the game progresses.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:55 am**

No, that's what zach would say

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:56 am**

In post 2170, Dunnstral wrote:And what about you Wake, will you vote sickofit/vedith?

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:01 am**

Hmmph...

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:02 am**

In post 2188, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 2170, Dunnstral wrote:And what about you Wake, will you vote sickofit/vedith?

I'm open to lynching that slot. Nosferatu was Scummy because he would not provide any content behind his words. Vedith I have not ISO'd. Tentatively I'd be open to voting him Day 1, but the slot hasn't been as bad as other slots. If it were a choice between no lynch or Sickofit1138 I'd choose the latter.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:02 am**

In post 2186, Wake1 wrote:
In post 2182, Boem_u_dusi wrote:And Wake drop that crap with telling everybody how they need to engage more. They aren't going to start engaging more because you told them to.
If I feel they need to engage more then I will say so, so your request is denied.

If they refuse to engage when they are able to then they will take responsibility for it as the game progresses.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:03 am**

In post 2187, Dunnstral wrote:No, that's what zach would say

Who was this directed towards?

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:03 am**

In post 2191, Boem_u_dusi wrote:
In post 2186, Wake1 wrote:
In post 2182, Boem_u_dusi wrote:And Wake drop that crap with telling everybody how they need to engage more. They aren't going to start engaging more because you told them to.
If I feel they need to engage more then I will say so, so your request is denied.

If they refuse to engage when they are able to then they will take responsibility for it as the game progresses.

Your reaction makes no sense.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:04 am**

In post 2192, Wake1 wrote:
In post 2187, Dunnstral wrote:No, that's what zach would say
Who was this directed towards?

Me. I was checking if Dunn 180ed his position.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:05 am**

All this constant changing is making me lose track of this game. I need a break from this game for awhile.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:05 am**

In post 2193, Wake1 wrote:Your reaction makes no sense.

OK do whatever you want, but I have never seen someone suddenly starting to engage more just because somebody told them to. And who established you as an activity policeman?

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:07 am**

In post 2196, Boem_u_dusi wrote:
In post 2193, Wake1 wrote:Your reaction makes no sense.
OK do whatever you want, but I have never seen someone suddenly starting to engage more just because somebody told them to. And who established you as an activity policeman?

I will say and do what I want, when I want.

And I have seen players engage more when called out on it.

Don't even try to say I'm an 'activity policeman' (whatever the fuck that is) for wanting certain players to participate in the game more. Stop being anti-Town and finding excuses for players not to play the game.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:08 am**

Dunnstral, next post will be your 400th. Congratulations.

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:09 am**

~HISTORY~

Day 1

~ I ask in 2170 for confirmation that

Wake88

is willing to lynch

Sickofit1138

and

Vedith

Day 1.

Wake88

hesitantly replies 'Yes' to both in 2190.

Mafiascum.net

New York 196: My Game, My Flavor Mafia (Mafia Win)