Mafiascum.net

In post 2172, the worst wrote:ok that's fine

why are we yelling at each other again?

Maybe because every time I've asked you a question, you refused to answer every single time, and accused me of everything from ignoring you, to asking "wonky" questions, to throwing a tantrum about the exact thing I *just* said wasn't what I'm posting about? I mean you're making misrepresentations I explicitly debunked in advance in the very posts you're misrepresenting.

In post 2164, Nauci wrote: But I'm not really giving a shit about how you read

me

. I need you to answer so we can read

you

. I don't think I'm the one who hasn't posted enough alignment indicative content.

VOTE: the worst

oh no not a scum vote
anything but a scum vote

I wanna lynch someone

I would strongly recommend lynching scum
who are you voting for?

UGH I am the walrus is gonna be stuck in my head now
Gustavo is maybe town btw

In post 2178, the worst wrote:I would strongly recommend lynching scum
who are you voting for?

He’s voting me.

Nobody is voting shos which is a shame because she’s actually scum

Gus, assume I'm town for a moment - who would you lynch?

Still you

The question asks you to assume I'm town because otherwise I have no way to talk about the game with you.

If I knew you were town I’d still policy lynch you. You’ve lied and been uncooperative which means I can’t trust you to cooperate with me later when it’s more useful.

Twice I made great posts that show you are scum and you didn’t even try to defend yourself. Town defend themselves from false accusations, scum try and ignore them and hope others do as well.

Plus that whole scum/town thing that somebody else pointed out was spot on. You trying to shade my predecessor as doing the same when it never happened is just more shade throwing. When asked about it you again just tried to ignore it instead of supporting your claim.

This isn’t a town mindset and if people can’t see that idk what else to do

Ill only vote you/skittle/elephant today.

In post 2184, Gustavo wrote:If I knew you were town I’d still policy lynch you. You’ve lied and been uncooperative which means I can’t trust you to cooperate with me later when it’s more useful.

Twice I made great posts that show you are scum and you didn’t even try to defend yourself. Town defend themselves from false accusations, scum try and ignore them and hope others do as well.

Plus that whole scum/town thing that somebody else pointed out was spot on. You trying to shade my predecessor as doing the same when it never happened is just more shade throwing. When asked about it you again just tried to ignore it instead of supporting your claim.

This isn’t a town mindset and if people can’t see that idk what else to do

Okay, so what is your opinion of page 87?

In post 2185, Gustavo wrote:Ill only vote you/skittle/elephant today.

I am out of snacks and would appreciate if you stopped summoning a craving for Skittles.

(I'll assume that you cased Skitter in the 10 pages I haven't read yet, for now.)

In post 2185, Gustavo wrote:Ill only vote you/skittle/elephant today.

Scumread of me is new I think? Where’d that come from?

Where’d your other scumreads (for example on Mom) go?

In post 2176, the worst wrote:oh no not a scum vote
anything but a scum vote

In post 2188, Irrelephant11 wrote:

In post 2185, Gustavo wrote:Ill only vote you/skittle/elephant today.

Scumread of me is new I think? Where’d that come from?

Where’d your other scumreads (for example on Mom) go?

This game was easier with only 1 Meji

In post 2190, Nauci wrote:

In post 2188, Irrelephant11 wrote:

In post 2185, Gustavo wrote:Ill only vote you/skittle/elephant today.

Scumread of me is new I think? Where’d that come from?

Where’d your other scumreads (for example on Mom) go?

This game was easier with only 1 Meji

Okay I ammend that statement to "more fun"

But we rather demonstrated that Meji-style is pro-scum, eh, old chap?

I mean yes but also I don’t know what your point is here?

Gus, I haven't responded to a lot of your attacks because I don't want to clutter the game with a long back-and-forth with you that isn't going to lead anywhere. I think you're town, so I was hoping we could still discuss the game despite the fact that you scumread me. But if you think I'm a policy lynch, nevermind. That's the type of thinking that makes working with you impossible.

@Nauci I agree with you on TW for the most part but in spite of everything I think he's a bit more risky compared to mom lynch

@TW I extremely doubt that scumteam (nauci,skitter,mom) FTR. Nauci I really think isn't scum, skitter probably not though I kind of forgot why, but moreover nauci skitter were the 2 voting mom yesterday and I really doubt if they'd make their partner highhandedly half viable as lynch when 1 easily could've like vanity voted or something too (there's bussing someone and then there's making someone who otherwise would never have gotten lynched a lynch option, which e.g. if gamma had like claimed pr mom would've probably been lynched). Strongly suggest on off chance you're town to look after mom in N_M, then maybe EP BV keysor slots at minimum in place of nauci.

Just to be clear you scumread skitter nauci because they scumread mom but pushed your lynch today
But here the case is the scumreads on you were fairly established ahead of time and furthermore it is extremely common for wagons to die of cold feet if on V/la or inactive
Furthermore skitter voted you first before going to mom, and skitter's follow on nauci (1776) as an "ok I'll follow you" is to my mind a rather rare interaction and I'd give hard anti-association anyways from their kind of mind melding thing and tons of talking about reads together over course of game.
Don't see how you can viably realistically push this as scumteam.

In post 2188, Irrelephant11 wrote:

In post 2185, Gustavo wrote:Ill only vote you/skittle/elephant today.

Scumread of me is new I think? Where’d that come from?

Where’d your other scumreads (for example on Mom) go?

You being an ass made me want to lynch you. Pretty sure I haven’t had a mom scum read today.

In post 2193, Shoshin wrote:Gus, I haven't responded to a lot of your attacks because I don't want to clutter the game with a long back-and-forth with you that isn't going to lead anywhere. I think you're town, so I was hoping we could still discuss the game despite the fact that you scumread me. But if you think I'm a policy lynch, nevermind. That's the type of thinking that makes working with you impossible.

Ignoring relevant things is scummy. We didn’t have to hve a long back and forth, a simple reasonable explanation and an attempt to show you were willing to work with, not against me would have gone a long way.

Oh you right, my bad. You scumread Keyser and Bernie earlier, though, I thought (based on 1678).

I have apologized for being over the top. I agree it was too much, and hope you can forgive me. At the same time, I think that's a bad reason to lynch someone. Do you scumread me?

In post 2192, Irrelephant11 wrote:I mean yes but also I don’t know what your point is here?

My frustration with the game correlates with the number of gif replies I make

it was just a bit of banter commiserating on the game state

Oh sorry I thought you were commenting on alignments and I was confused. Yeah more fun for sure