Mafiascum.net

In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:p-edit and succinct was enter right?

Correct.

In post 2169, skitter30 wrote:

In post 2166, Brigitte wrote:That is L-1. I will self hammer tomorrow.

like this isn't a scummy reaction imo

Agreed, but is it a town reaction?

Why did everyone show up right when I was about to leave

Fuck it

Succinct what are your overall thoughts atm?

it started ~my argument with you (last night? two nights ago) and then i read your posts today just now and they felt townie
i don't know why/how that changed

In post 2175, Succinct wrote:

In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:p-edit and succinct was enter right?

Correct.

In post 2169, skitter30 wrote:

In post 2166, Brigitte wrote:That is L-1. I will self hammer tomorrow.

like this isn't a scummy reaction imo

Agreed, but is it a town reaction?

it's not a scummy one tho
i don't know if it's townie but it isn't scummy, and pushing 'not-townie' == 'scummy' is fallacious

or, that's not quite wha tyou pushed, sorry, but pushing someone on the basis of their actions not being townie (when it's agreed tehy also aren't scummy) is awful imo

nobody said it was scummy.
"not scummy = townie" is equally so.

In post 2171, skitter30 wrote:boy am i interested in hearing more about these (specifically: me, creature, chara, nimueh, and tris)

Creature's scumgame's not this good.
You said it yourself:

In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:given that i'm quite good at obvtowning when i'm, like, town

tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.
Nimueh's stances vaguely look town.
Chara I lack sufficient data right now.

Will update these as appropriate.

In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:(i'd be kinda interested in hearing more about this (maybe in like post-game or whatever) because i think those two games are quite different actually)

I'd be interested in a discussion on discord or something at some point

I kinda feel like we share some idiosyncrasies but I still find you weirdly hard to read

In post 2182, Succinct wrote:tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.

Expand.

So many posts!

bleh i have a whole rant about this but i was typing fast and didn't really hit most of the nuances

basically i really, really, really hate it when people get pushed on the basis of not being townie (especially day1); i don't think that not being townie is at all the same thing as being scummy

i don't think that not being scummy is quite the same thing as being townie either

but offering to self-vote .... i just dont' see coming from scum here really

pedit i don't type that fast

In post 2180, skitter30 wrote:or, that's not quite wha tyou pushed, sorry, but pushing someone on the basis of their actions not being townie (when it's agreed tehy also aren't scummy) is awful imo

Not my intention. My meaning was Brigitte's suspicious; one post not being scummy's not enough to change that, unless it's sufficiently strongly town-indicative, thus my question; was it a town reaction? If it's nai, then it doesn't change prior scumminess.

In post 2177, Ankamius wrote:Succinct what are your overall thoughts atm?

In post 2165, Succinct wrote:Is the game really "some slots townread each other, almost lynched NMSA together", nothing more?
If so, who were all the NMSA voters?

Creature

>

skitter30 > tris = Ankamius

>

Nimueh >

Xtoxm = xRECKONERx = NotMySpamAccount = Elbirn = Chara

(need more on all of these)

>

Flubbernugget = Brigitte

Barring further info.

Reasons for non-grayed reads already given; grayed reads = need more info.

In post 2187, Succinct wrote:then it doesn't change prior scumminess.

Expand.

In post 2182, Succinct wrote:

In post 2171, skitter30 wrote:boy am i interested in hearing more about these (specifically: me, creature, chara, nimueh, and tris)

Creature's scumgame's not this good.
You said it yourself:

In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:given that i'm quite good at obvtowning when i'm, like, town

tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.
Nimueh's stances vaguely look town.
Chara I lack sufficient data right now.

Will update these as appropriate.

i don't think that creature's broken out of his scumrange yet, actually
i'm chalking at least part of that up to being a replacement and giving him a bit of a pass but it ends at the start of tomorrow

that quote about me is literally from a sentence where i said that i'm good at looking townie as scum so that's also a bad reason to townread me

i also have no idea how well you know my playstyle but like if you don't know me trusting my word on that also seems like a bad idea

i kinda gutscum read all of tris's posts but i don't know if that's a playstyle thing
i agree that the wagon is gross tho

kinda disagree on nimueh but eh

In post 2136, tris wrote:But, I said honestly so it has to be honest.

In post 2185, tris wrote:So many posts!

why did you start fluffing when momentum shifted towards Brigitte?

In post 2183, Ankamius wrote:

In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:(i'd be kinda interested in hearing more about this (maybe in like post-game or whatever) because i think those two games are quite different actually)

I'd be interested in a discussion on discord or something at some point

I kinda feel like we share some idiosyncrasies but I still find you weirdly hard to read

sounds like fun, remind me postgame!

I'm a bit concerned with the amount of people that have managed to sync with me this game so far, this doesn't feel like the kind of game where that should be happening this early

creature isnt any where near out of his scum range and that top tr on him is really weird

In post 2187, Succinct wrote:Not my intention. My meaning was Brigitte's suspicious; one post not being scummy's not enough to change that, unless it's sufficiently strongly town-indicative, thus my question; was it a town reaction? If it's nai, then it doesn't change prior scumminess.

it's pretty close to being a sufficiently townie reaction to me; i'm still like processing it but that's the side i'm landing on
her whole approach to her wagon and just doesn't feel liek scum to me
she's also been actively sorting people in the meanwhile (see the convo with chara two pages ago); if she's scum who can see the inevitable approaching i'm not sure that convo like happens

I miss Enter.

In post 2184, Brigitte wrote:

In post 2182, Succinct wrote:tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.

Expand.

In post 2117, northsidegal wrote:

Votecount 1.14

tris(5)

~ skitter30(221), Brigitte(240), Elbirn(217), Creature(36), Flubbernugget(78)

The only names town here're skitter/Creature; Elbirn's null; wagon formed quickly; wagon has both Flubbernugget/Brigitte on it (my scumreads).

tris's content hasn't been suspect; burden of proof lies on accusers and I've not seen any convincing arguments. (Or any, but I admit I may have missed them.)

In post 2196, Succinct wrote:

In post 2184, Brigitte wrote:

In post 2182, Succinct wrote:tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.

Expand.

In post 2117, northsidegal wrote:

Votecount 1.14

tris(5)

~ skitter30(221), Brigitte(240), Elbirn(217), Creature(36), Flubbernugget(78)

The only names town here're skitter/Creature; Elbirn's null; wagon formed quickly; wagon has both Flubbernugget/Brigitte on it (my scumreads).

tris's content hasn't been suspect; burden of proof lies on accusers and I've not seen any convincing arguments. (Or any, but I admit I may have missed them.)

What even is this.

Are you arguing VCA on Day 1 with ZERO Flips?