Mafiascum.net

In post 2173, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 6 stop calling people names and just play mafia.

I didn't call you a name anymore than you saying I lack awareness for stating the obvious. The last proposed gets to pick who lives and dies. That is the most control, not least.

In post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts that

It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen by requesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.

In post 2175, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 2173, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 6 stop calling people names and just play mafia.

I didn't call you a name anymore than you saying I lack awareness for stating the obvious. The last proposed gets to pick who lives and dies. That is the most control, not least.

Saying you aren't exemplifying objective qualities is an effort to get you to fix and repair those qualities (or acquire where lacking) - lack of awareness can be fixed by reading the thread more and trying to approach again. I haven't yet insulted you personally yet, nor said you are something, and everything I've said is pertaining to the game.

You calling me a pig and telling me to go die are just you lashing out at me - it serves no productive purpose and it's not relevant to the game. Stop. It's childish and petty.

In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts that

It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen by

not

requesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.

Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?

Yeah didnt we already have enough toxicity for 1 day?

Saying the things you do are bad should be triggers to get you to stop doing those things, not reasons for you to just start name calling.

In post 2178, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts that

It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen by

not

requesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.

Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?

She meant no insult by it.

@Gentleman4, I don't know. I have told you to quit being bad and you double down saying I'm bad. Take your own medicine and please be quiet so the last three gentlemen propose.

In post 2178, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 2176, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 2172, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit I wonder if FG even accepts that

It was not intended as a Moderator-processable custom auto-accept request. It is a declaration to the other players in this game of my intentions. Unlike some of the other Ladies, I will not be V/LA during the critical period and I can contribute to promoting our preferred order of invitations by the three remaining Gentlemen by

not

requesting an auto-accept from the Moderator at this time.

Excuse me? You think I want to be VLA during this time?

No? I was just explaining why I don't need to arrange an auto-accept from the Moderator (which I had been recommended to do) - because I won't be V/LA. It is completely neutral that you will be V/LA; given that you will be, your best option is to declare an auto-accept.

You are an odd one L6.

Im glad youre not my problem

In post 2181, Lady 6 wrote:@Gentleman4, I don't know. I have told you to quit being bad and you double down saying I'm bad. Take your own medicine and please be quiet so the last three gentlemen propose.

Btw, this is town.

Scum is not making stupid moves like this.

I'm gonna be honest I don't even really know what I'm doing that's bad, but I'm scared to ask so I'm just going to leave it be.

Oh jesus 20 new pages. I cannot parse this at the present hour.

Please don't have 20 more by the time I wake up

Most of it barely pertains to you or your choice anyways. I would skim and look specifically for items pertaining to the remaining ladies and make your choice, preferably sooner rather than later, since the other two gentlemen are presumably waiting on you.

In post 2148, Gentleman 5 wrote:Yeah L5 took too long and her hestiance was bad.

I took L4 because I gave up on L5.

And I like ceasar salad

Why was it bad?

In post 2186, Gentleman 3 wrote:Oh jesus 20 new pages. I cannot parse this at the present hour.

Please don't have 20 more by the time I wake up

good to hear from you again.
Looking forward to your choice tomorrow.

In post 2184, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 2181, Lady 6 wrote:@Gentleman4, I don't know. I have told you to quit being bad and you double down saying I'm bad. Take your own medicine and please be quiet so the last three gentlemen propose.

Btw, this is town.

Scum is not making stupid moves like this.

I disagree.
Throwing shade on the most townist player/pair other then confirm Town player isn’t a bad move for scum.

Like think.
As scum would you want a town leading or would you want to try and lead yourself?
My point being is that if Lady 6 is Scum. They are definitely trying to get rid of the most non confirmed Townist pair.
Which if done correctly, could make a Scum the strongest town leader and able to lead scum to victory.
So by no means is doing as such making them not scum as I believe they scum read G4 (I could be wrong but I believe this is the case)

I also think L1 or L6 should be removed.
As I feel it’s a TVS.

And if it’s a TvT it’s not good to keep considering Gent 5 and Gent 6 are doing a similar thing to that of L1 and L6.

I haven't read everything yet, just skipped around. Will still read tomorrow but L5 I would like it if you gave a brief summary, in context, of what led you to this:

In post 2101, Lady 5 wrote:@Gent 3 Don’t pair with Lady 6. Choose either Lady 2 or me.

because I'm currently leaning toward asking L6.

Yes Gent 5 could say “But I Town read Gent 6” but you scum read Lady 8 so regardless you still want to push that slot.

If G5 and G6 are TvS it's no great mystery which is which.

By the way I'm aware that I'll probably discover the context for what I asked about as I reread, but I still think a concise summary will help.

In post 2194, Gentleman 3 wrote:I haven't read everything yet, just skipped around. Will still read tomorrow but L5 I would like it if you gave a brief summary, in context, of what led you to this:

In post 2101, Lady 5 wrote:@Gent 3 Don’t pair with Lady 6. Choose either Lady 2 or me.

because I'm currently leaning toward asking L6.

Because of the interaction between Lady 6 and Lady 1.
It is a similar interaction between Gent 5 and Gent 6 which could cost Town the game especially if they are all stubborn enough to Thunder dome themselves.

And as I stated before, if we want to avoid constant miss Lynch we need to remove any major interaction that could make them occur.

Let’s say I accepted Gent 5’s offer and Lady 4 is in my position.
I would still say the same thing.
I would still say either Lady 1 or Lady 6 needs to go.

Yes sure may some people view me as a PL.
But do I have any interactions that can cost Town the game? No
Do I spam and not care about the game? No
Do I focus on one certain target and refuse to consider anyone else? No, as 3 scum still are present in this game
Do I try to talk with people and give my reads? Yes, even if it seems like I don’t from my inactivity in the past
Do I game Solve? Absolutely!
Do I play like garbage? Sometimes, but I’m going to try and avoid that now.

In post 2196, Gentleman 3 wrote:If G5 and G6 are TvS it's no great mystery which is which.

@Gent 3