Mafiascum.net

I townread me. Drew's been making more sense today, too. Like, an uncanny amount of 'more sense'.

But, seeing as how that readslist was maybe a third of the playerbase, I wouldnt put more than a casual stock into it. Thats a deceptive way to approach the game when his literal job is to lie.

Why are you being so awkward about it?

Rule of three only requires three names grouped together to work.

Why are you so focused on what a noncontentful poster posted? Youre smarter than that

You lot are the ones that promised IKS was an informative lynch. I'm merely attempting to use the information.

Also today's wagons are literal dogshit.

So, who are scummy-acting townies and who the freak is ACTUAL SCUM in this game??

Doctor Drew voted IKS twice, pushed for the shred, then found himself off of it before shred before it went through.

Things that make you go hmm.

Fuck I've been hot-dogging the English in my posts recently. I need to sleep more.

In post 2179, chkflip wrote:You lot are the ones that promised IKS was an informative lynch. I'm merely attempting to use the information.

Also today's wagons are literal dogshit.

the wagons are what is informative to me.

what people did is more truthful and informative than what anyone said.

In post 2181, chkflip wrote:Things that make you go hmm.

Are you tempting me???

In post 2163, BrightEyedFish wrote:

In post 2108, a2rudeboy wrote:if we are gonna wagon NPOM, let's fucking do it.

Has this sentiment from you completely vanished?

In post 221, a2rudeboy wrote:I'm telling you guys. You don't want to lynch NPOM

I know you said later on something to the effect that you have nothing "solid" irt post 221, but is your NPOM town read gone?

I never once had a town read on NPOM.

In post 2173, chkflip wrote:So, to be clear, we're all just cool with Looker literally only shading those that've looked at him as scum with insults, not refuted anything brought to him, and the continued busywork posting?

We'd really rather lynch NPOM, Walter, or fucking Lavender?

Seems legit.

Nah, I'm not cool with it, and would vote there. Intertia...

In post 2053, Doctor Drew wrote:I can't even understand why a sane person would think the most logical explanation is that they are clearly together, I honestly am baffled by your thought train. You are doing some crazy mental gymnastics here.

It's not just the stuff to do with you and PK either. He's all over the place on just about everything else, too.

In post 2074, chkflip wrote:It's the lack of scumhunting and actual analysis within the formatting that I have a problem with. He's just prodding, sometimes aimlessly, to look busy. Very little followthrough on questions which shows he doesn't actually give a shit about the answer. He just wants the air of doing something productive without actually being as much.

Don't forget the air of pretentiousness to accompany it.


I totally empathize with chk's 2082.

In post 2087, TiphaineDeath wrote:This is a better wagon than NPOM today because they should not be the same alignment.

I don't like your chk case at all.

One reason is your quick snippet about his Titus vote. People vote for all sorts of reasons on Day 1, but mostly for pressure/figuring out reads. You can be town while pressure voting another townie to get them to respond. It's not like there was a wagon on Titus, but pressure was deserved on her slot. Also, she wasn't as ridiculously town as you are pushing in 2091, which is rich given that you're saying as such after her flip.

On his defense of IKS, I have defended the wrong person before and I could see where IKS could be taken as frustrated town. Unfortunately, for chk, IKS flipped scum, but his action of defending IKS is null as he could have done it as scum, but he also could have done it as town. I believe the latter because I don't think chk would have stuck his neck out for a buddy like that.

Chk has pretty well taken care of himself on this back and forth (I wasn't surprised by that) and dismantled every point. I do think you're barking up the wrong tree, and I'm hoping you're just misguided town in this situation.

In post 2101, Galron wrote:@chk the defense of you haven't read doesn't really hold water. He may have a bad argument, but using that defense is a non-starter.

False. He stated from the beginning that he wasn't going to catch up. So yes, I think it's fair for him to make that point now.

In post 2104, TiphaineDeath wrote:The possibility that you are scum with siteflake and NPOM is miraculously town is what I am looking at right now CHK.

That was Day 1. Why would anyone who was aligned with IKS stick their neck out for that sinking ship that early in the game? I know that's WIFOM, but come on. In my opinion, Chkflip (no offense, bud) would leave the women and children and take the boat.

In post 2115, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 2109, TiphaineDeath wrote:@Bear I mean, there is more information to be gathered between here and there, but yeah, prolly.

It just seems to me that if you are insisting that Chk/Npom is T/S that the better choice would be to flip Npom

+1


However, I will like to withdraw my vote of NPOM because I think there are bigger fish to fry in the Looker/Lavender pool. I prefer Looker, but Lavender may be the better choice here.

UNVOTE: NPOM

2157 seals that deal.

VOTE: Looker

In post 2157, Looker wrote:I went skydiving today and passed my AFF Lvl 1 jump!

How expensive was it? Skydiving is definitely on my todo list, and with the new income I get from my new job, Im totes thinking about thinking about looking into it.

Whats nice about the iks wagon and all the wagons today is that, no matter who we lynch there will be a great comparison value for all of the wagons once we get more flips.

I actually think looker is town. just a really bored town. I wish he'd take the game more cereal.

I don't understand how you can be "bored town" when you haven't even been here other than to sling insults.

In post 2177, chkflip wrote:Rule of three only requires three names grouped together to work.

I had always thought rule of three applied only to a group of "same read type", i.e. "I TR x, y & z" or "I SR a, b & c". But you do you.

I don't think Looker generally plays larges, and he's posting normally for him except not hitting as many players in his bullet points. If he's town, he'll be good in the end game. Is he town? Dunno.

Lookers OMGUS didn't look good. Not sure what being in a large has to do with that.

What's the rule of 3?

@starbuck, he was not a sinking ship, NPOM wagon was very real alternative.

In post 2194, Almost50 wrote:I had always thought rule of three applied only to a group of "same read type", i.e. "I TR x, y & z" or "I SR a, b & c". But you do you.

Correct. Though it isn't out of the realm of possibility that "these two are scum and this one is null scum" can fall under the same umbrella rule.