Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:36 pm
In post 2166, NorwegianboyEE wrote:N_M can't feel human emotions such as frustration.
In post 2166, NorwegianboyEE wrote:N_M can't feel human emotions such as frustration.
LelIn post 2174, Bypasser Catcher wrote:you've seen people claim PRs early before.In post 2170, Rannygazoo wrote:Titus, does this feel like that other game to you, where all the town PRs just gave up and voted themselves?
In post 2179, Rannygazoo wrote:LelIn post 2174, Bypasser Catcher wrote:you've seen people claim PRs early before.In post 2170, Rannygazoo wrote:Titus, does this feel like that other game to you, where all the town PRs just gave up and voted themselves?
In my last game with Titus, a town PR put themselves on E-1 and got hammered on day 1 and day 2.
Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.In post 2168, quiet wrote:What Bypasser said makes sense to me. I could understand not claiming then, operating under the assumption that NM would get elimmed pretty inevitably in a day or two if they had faked the claim (and i'm like, 85% sure that is the world we are living in), but putting pressure back on NM or someone else makes more sense that what actually went down.
You're not on E-1 I don't thinkIn post 2178, Nero Cain wrote:y isn't nm hammering like he said he would?
I see it as distancing.In post 2182, Andresvmb wrote:Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.In post 2168, quiet wrote:What Bypasser said makes sense to me. I could understand not claiming then, operating under the assumption that NM would get elimmed pretty inevitably in a day or two if they had faked the claim (and i'm like, 85% sure that is the world we are living in), but putting pressure back on NM or someone else makes more sense that what actually went down.
That’s some dumb distancing with Nero at the brink. It’s already been achieved by now if that was the goal.In post 2184, Bypasser Catcher wrote:I see it as distancing.In post 2182, Andresvmb wrote:Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.In post 2168, quiet wrote:What Bypasser said makes sense to me. I could understand not claiming then, operating under the assumption that NM would get elimmed pretty inevitably in a day or two if they had faked the claim (and i'm like, 85% sure that is the world we are living in), but putting pressure back on NM or someone else makes more sense that what actually went down.
You don’t have to go fake claim to make the point “stronger”.In post 2186, Andresvmb wrote:That’s some dumb distancing with Nero at the brink. It’s already been achieved by now if that was the goal.In post 2184, Bypasser Catcher wrote:I see it as distancing.In post 2182, Andresvmb wrote:Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.In post 2168, quiet wrote:What Bypasser said makes sense to me. I could understand not claiming then, operating under the assumption that NM would get elimmed pretty inevitably in a day or two if they had faked the claim (and i'm like, 85% sure that is the world we are living in), but putting pressure back on NM or someone else makes more sense that what actually went down.
I firmly believe that behavior pattern is one scum sometimes employ either consciously or subconsciously to have someone to shift or share blame with for their stances.In post 2025, Bypasser Catcher wrote:I'm doing the opposite of discrediting ppl fwiw. I'm giving ppl, btw that I townread and believe should be townblocked, the confirmation that their thought process is shared by me as well.
btwIn post 2141, Nero Cain wrote:yeah I was fakeclaiming. im still town though. pls vote me.In post 2132, Andresvmb wrote:I mean Nero this is a mistake yeah? You should have outted and condemned Not_Mafia to an execution.
excuse me?
This was not my read whatsoever. I read them as either distancing, or trying to claim that NM had faked the tracker claim, that he was the real tracker all along.In post 2182, Andresvmb wrote:Here’s my issue with your logic here. You are quite certain that Not_Mafia is Scum and making a false Role claim correct? So why are you happy about your Nero vote again? Nero is so sure Not_Mafia is Scum, they fakeclaimed Not_Mafia’s role in frustration. So clearly they’re not aligned as Scum.
Lol
I don’t think it’s going to flip Scum. I’m probably a complete idiot but yeah.
I’m not afraid to hammer. It’s not that. I just think this is a mistake.In post 2195, Bypasser Catcher wrote:wheres the andres who voted outside of a 1v1 in a lylo situation?