Mafiascum.net

In post 2174, Kerset wrote:

In post 2144, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Kerset, let's go. Let's convince you I'm town, and let's convince you MaxTheFox is scum. AMA.

In post 2172, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 2162, Dwlee99 wrote:I think the case on HEM is bad.

Thank you! Geez.

It really sucks having to explain myself like this when it's too obvious.

blame yourself for this idea

In post 2177, Kerset wrote:so why max didn't kill box early? This is the most obvious move and the most exceptable from 2021 member

In post 2172, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 2162, Dwlee99 wrote:I think the case on HEM is bad.

Thank you! Geez.

It really sucks having to explain myself like this when it's too obvious.

In post 2162, Dwlee99 wrote:There's like a couple of things I could see pointing towards HEM scum but because no one else is pointing them out I think the case on HEM is bad.

In post 2177, Kerset wrote:so why max didn't kill box early? This is the most obvious move and the most exceptable from 2021 member

In post 1325, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 1323, Dwlee99 wrote:HEM why are you so sure a50 was the protect? Or at least not boxxy?

nomnomnom doesn't buy boxxy, so not boxxy. nomnomnom doesn't completely buy a50 either, but someone has made the observation that there hasn't been any PR crumbs from anyone. it's questionable for scum to kill anyone but town!boxxy or town!Almost50 who has claimed investigative.

so it's either scum went straight for nomnomnom or they killed A50 and nomnomnom protected A50.

I'm just trying to dispel the narrative that I would belong to a team that would kill A50 or nomnomnom.

In post 1327, humaneatingmonkey wrote:If you think that nomnomnom wouldn't have protected boxxy or A50, then that's a strong point that would indicate boxxy and/or A50 being scum.

In post 2170, MaxTheFox wrote:

In post 2168, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 2166, MaxTheFox wrote:Actually no she wasn't widely TRed at that point anymore. I remember it clearly.

Prove it

Burden of proof is on you, you claimed she was TRed by people first.

humaneatingmonkey wrote:And why would I kill Kyuoku? The guy was willing to elim boxxy with me. If the play was have boxxy stay so I can elim him, I would have needed Kyuoku. And even so, I would have never made that play. Killing boxxy was the obvious move.

You know who has motive to kill Kyuoku? Someone who had played with him before, and could expose his scumgame. That's MaxTheFox.

In post 1357, boxxy wrote:Course he could also take a chance on a random but as certain as he way my bet is he tries to hide behind me. But we might be descending down a WIFOM rabbit hole analyzing this.

A massclaim here might be okay.

In post 1358, humaneatingmonkey wrote:That's also possible ngl.

In post 1434, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 1432, Dwlee99 wrote:Also what made you change your mind on who you think nom targeted? Am I misremembering when I think you said that you thought nom targeted a50?

you said that he would not hide behind a slot that's likely to be an NK, and if town!Almost50 was likely to be an NK because of his claimed role, then he wouldn't have hid behind them. i think that makes sense.

boxxy raised the point that nom could have also hid behind his scumreads. his scumread on A50 was similar to mine — associative. he was thinking boxxy was scum first, so it could also be likely that nom hid there.

In post 2183, humaneatingmonkey wrote:And why would I kill Kyuoku? The guy was willing to elim boxxy with me. If the play was have boxxy stay so I can elim him, I would have needed Kyuoku. And even so, I would have never made that play. Killing boxxy was the obvious move.

You know who has motive to kill Kyuoku? Someone who had played with him before, and could expose his scumgame. That's MaxTheFox.

In post 2187, Kerset wrote:

In post 2183, humaneatingmonkey wrote:And why would I kill Kyuoku? The guy was willing to elim boxxy with me. If the play was have boxxy stay so I can elim him, I would have needed Kyuoku. And even so, I would have never made that play. Killing boxxy was the obvious move.

You know who has motive to kill Kyuoku? Someone who had played with him before, and could expose his scumgame. That's MaxTheFox.

yea that is my main argument why max is evil but a shame its form a50 not myself

In post 2180, MaxTheFox wrote:Point them out then

In post 2189, MaxTheFox wrote:

In post 2187, Kerset wrote:

In post 2183, humaneatingmonkey wrote:And why would I kill Kyuoku? The guy was willing to elim boxxy with me. If the play was have boxxy stay so I can elim him, I would have needed Kyuoku. And even so, I would have never made that play. Killing boxxy was the obvious move.

You know who has motive to kill Kyuoku? Someone who had played with him before, and could expose his scumgame. That's MaxTheFox.

yea that is my main argument why max is evil but a shame its form a50 not myself

Now explain why he couldn't be doing this to frame

me

?

In post 2191, Kerset wrote:

In post 2189, MaxTheFox wrote:

In post 2187, Kerset wrote:

In post 2183, humaneatingmonkey wrote:And why would I kill Kyuoku? The guy was willing to elim boxxy with me. If the play was have boxxy stay so I can elim him, I would have needed Kyuoku. And even so, I would have never made that play. Killing boxxy was the obvious move.

You know who has motive to kill Kyuoku? Someone who had played with him before, and could expose his scumgame. That's MaxTheFox.

yea that is my main argument why max is evil but a shame its form a50 not myself

Now explain why he couldn't be doing this to frame

me

?

bc he is not a diviner to predict the he will argue you in lylo

In post 2194, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Kerset, are we good? Any more?

In post 2191, Kerset wrote:bc he is not a diviner to predict the he will argue you in lylo