Mafiascum.net

In post 2168, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 2161, Roden wrote:I'm wrong about someone but idk who

STD/Johnny/NM are my hard town reads, Gamma/Dwlee/Enchant/Kitty are my PoE. But STD and Gamma attacking each other and no one really reacting to it feels really off. Like, we're in MELO, STD is voting, and nobody cares. No one's agreeing that Gamma is scummy or freaking out about a scum quick hammer.

My thought process here is that if Gamma were scum, there would be actual push back. So maybe Gamma is town, and scum is waiting for STD to make another big push and for another townie to vote with him. Dwlee/Enchant/Kitty might be the solve then, but if Nancy/Johnny is right about Kitty being town then I'm wrong about one of my town reads.

I feel like Nancy spewed her slot as town, for multiple reasons. STD has felt genuine all game. So maybe I'm wrong on NM.

To 2161: I was thinking kind of similar (at least the lack of initiative happening) but was saving to see if more stuff would happen. Basically, it feels like scum are taking no initiative here because they think they have a way to win by just waiting for town to screw up. I think STD is hard town right now, and I have no interest in voting him out. Johnny I can agree is townie from Nancy. NM I'm kind of reevaluating on the basis that scum seemingly think they have an easy mislim, which could just be me/kitty voting NM. Which would imply NM and Kitty are town. Which gives me a town of me/STD/Johnny/Kitty/NM and a scum team of Gamma/Enchant/Roden

Now if I'm right you're scum, so do you think my logic is bad and we are both town, or that my logic is right except I'm scum?

The only way we're both town is if if we're both dead wrong about our town reads.

I feel like Johnny is lock town. That's one slot I'm not going to be willing to change my mind about.

If we're both town, one of STD vs Gamma or Kitty vs NM has a serious chance to be scum theatre. STD vs Gamma is less likely for the reasons I've given.

Do you think Enchant is scummy or is he just PoE?

I have an answer for the Enchant question after dweelee answers.

If we are both town can't it just be that Kitty or NM is scum but not both

Also I guess poe but he is also scummy

Well that was boring. But yeah enchant doesn't seem to be interested in solving shit

Half of town didn't claim if they used jailkeeps.

In post 2167, Dwlee99 wrote:Why the hell is Kitty ignoring my question

@Roden: no action N1, harmography NM N2, no one attacked him. Was hoping town would attack him and if he were scum I would generate conftowns

I missed it.

I pain potioned NM night 1. That's it, I didn't get a pain potion N2 or I would finish him off.

I didn't use a JK either.

Didn’t someone claim to JK Kitty?

Why you didn't claim pain potion before?

I jk kitty n1

Jk n1
Harmography n2

In post 2177, Dwlee99 wrote:If we are both town can't it just be that Kitty or NM is scum but not both

Also I guess poe but he is also scummy

It's possible yeah. I just think one of the 1v1's could easily be theatre. Though Kitty vs NM just seems one-sided at this point.

Is anyone town reading Enchant?

Next person that reads this thread and says nothing your moms a ho

My mum aint no ho

here now, gonna take a look at this game and see if i can articulate my reads

In post 2186, Roden wrote:Is anyone town reading Enchant?

i actually am

i thought his push on you D1 was limp and useless and if scum i don't know the point of that

i also like some of their mech related posts

but it's not a strong read

gamma has a lot of posts where she just kind of...does nothing. i'm not saying that she can't post emojis but a large portion of her iso is popping into the thread to post a ":/" and then disappear again, it seems

In post 820, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 476, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Kitty?

Hmm

In post 855, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 534, Save The Dragons wrote:I think all those things make you scum

I don't know what cftwr means

waitwaitwait

In post 1056, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1045, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what are the odds of scum theater here guys

In post 1046, humaneatingmonkey wrote:nancy v std

In post 1068, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1175, Gamma Emerald wrote:-_-

In post 1645, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1642, Enchant wrote:I call cheating!

lulw

In post 1895, Gamma Emerald wrote::/

In post 2110, Gamma Emerald wrote:-_-

In post 2137, Gamma Emerald wrote::/

i'm still confused by the "voting to save kitty" the only response to me correcting her was that she was busy

In post 1654, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1637, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: facebones

In post 1652, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: kitty

why vote kitty after you voted facebones which saved kitty?

In post 1657, Save The Dragons wrote:and my vote didn't save kitty check again

In post 1669, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’ve had a busy day
I went after that post because it didn’t take a lot of effort to make my point

there's no follow up afterward (maybe because she realized i was right?) but it just feels like a failed attempt to shade me some more.

i feel like this is emblematic of gamma's play this game. pocket some people, throw shade on some others, but mostly post just to post and post, with lots of IIoA posts and LAMIST posts and throwing shade from the sidelines. Because of this, gamma doesn't feel like much of a presence in this game, willing to let the Nancy Sinatra slot drive wagons onto town.

In post 245, Roden wrote:UNVOTE:

Sinatra vs NM is TvT. Can I get the two of you to back off for a moment and reset please?

i wonder if this is TMI?

kitty's case on me just sucks it looks like a fake read, not fleshed out.

In post 172, KittyTacky wrote:STD (unfortunate acronym) seems quite scummy given his exchange with Nancy.

VOTE: Save The Dragons

In post 670, KittyTacky wrote:STD really talks like caught scum. It's just damning, at least to me.

In post 797, KittyTacky wrote:You play like me when I was caught scum before. And also independently of that, I don't like the tone of your posts.

In post 812, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 739, Save The Dragons wrote: this is me trying to engage kittytacky to get them to produce more content and explain why they read me like they do. here's what kitty says in response:

In post 280, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 227, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 172, KittyTacky wrote:STD (unfortunate acronym) seems quite scummy given his exchange with Nancy.

VOTE: Save The Dragons

what part of it

Most of it.

The alternative would be quoting half your ISO.

Is that the end of the thoughts or

yeah

i only have so much effort to give

In post 2183, Enchant wrote:Why you didn't claim pain potion before?

I didn't think it was the right play to claim pain pot usage.

In post 2193, Save The Dragons wrote:kitty's case on me just sucks it looks like a fake read, not fleshed out.

In post 172, KittyTacky wrote:STD (unfortunate acronym) seems quite scummy given his exchange with Nancy.

VOTE: Save The Dragons

In post 670, KittyTacky wrote:STD really talks like caught scum. It's just damning, at least to me.

In post 797, KittyTacky wrote:You play like me when I was caught scum before. And also independently of that, I don't like the tone of your posts.

In post 812, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 739, Save The Dragons wrote: this is me trying to engage kittytacky to get them to produce more content and explain why they read me like they do. here's what kitty says in response:

In post 280, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 227, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 172, KittyTacky wrote:STD (unfortunate acronym) seems quite scummy given his exchange with Nancy.

VOTE: Save The Dragons

what part of it

Most of it.

The alternative would be quoting half your ISO.

I'm just finding it hard to articulate.

I could flip gamma I think?