In post 1908, ZZZX wrote:I know I promised full reads today but I am posting from my 3g as my familly decided today is a good day for a field trip.
a few hours... hopefully... I promise for real! I got a full readlist nearly ready in my pc I have been working on since yesterday.
In post 316, ZZZX wrote:I know I promised full reads today but I am posting from my 3g as my familly decided today is a good day for a field trip.
a few hours... hopefully... I promise for real! I got a full readlist nearly ready in my pc I have been working on since yesterday.
Micro 350 ended a while back so I can bring this up now.
When I saw both of these I just went "haah"
Guess who was trying to get lynched in Micro 350.
Do you think I am jester? jester play <> scum play. Jester play had to be closer to my town play than scum play. Also I promised reads in both games. and both of them said the same thing about the field trip which makes it confirmed.
So?
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:57 am
by Titus
In post 2190, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:2133and 2156 are current elements of bringing in emotion. Complaints about the game in both. 2133 you call yourself frustrated town. It is more cloaked overall. Then the "I am only run up early as town" non-sense. You yourself have prided yourself on saying that it is all null and now you are saying you do or have one thing happen as town and one as scum... I believe this is your scum game. Time will prove me right or wrong.
While "frustrated town" is a statement involving emotion it is not an appeal to emotion. The rest is not clear but self-meta is not AtE. You are leaving out the
Appeal
in AtE. AtE requires a statement that is not meant to be interpreted logically. Logically talking about emotions or stating your own is not AtE.
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:03 am
by Xayzeck
In post 2200, ZZZX wrote:Do you think I am jester? jester play scum play. Jester play had to be closer to my town play than scum play. Also I promised reads in both games. and both of them said the same thing about the field trip which makes it confirmed.
No it doesn't make it confirmed.
Point being you had full reads for that game but not here? What? Where did this game's readlist go but you still had one for the other?
And I find it hard to believe you had a full readlist prepared for BOTH games but only promptly delivered on that one and not here.
So you're lying.
And you have no reason to lie if you're town.
So get lynched.
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:09 am
by Titus
That is a case I can sheep until I read through the thread and verify. My vote on Doublade is the best but no one is voting it and I've spent more than half the day. Time to start collasping the wagons.
Also try to meta me if you want. my playstyle is never differant.
I'm not voting you over your playstyle.
I'll agree that I don't know why most of the other people are voting you - but they also haven't been saying playstyle, so I'm not sure where this is coming from, really.
Also try to meta me if you want. my playstyle is never differant.
I'm not voting you over your playstyle.
I'll agree that I don't know why most of the other people are voting you - but they also haven't been saying playstyle, so I'm not sure where this is coming from, really.
Like you sheeped without knowing why
GOD FREAKING DAMN IT LOL.
In post 2203, Titus wrote:That is a case I can sheep until I read through the thread and verify. My vote on Doublade is the best but no one is voting it and I've spent more than half the day. Time to start collasping the wagons.
VOTE: ZZZX
WELCOME TO THE NAKED OPPURTANSITIVE VOTES CLUB TITUS
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:49 am
by Titus
Bleh. It's not naked. It could use more and I will be reviewing. Your response is not townie though. You act as if my vote is static when there is another plausible wagon. Saying someone's logic is not naked. So why are you so scared of a vote that may be temporary?
In post 1908, ZZZX wrote:I know I promised full reads today but I am posting from my 3g as my familly decided today is a good day for a field trip.
a few hours... hopefully... I promise for real! I got a full readlist nearly ready in my pc I have been working on since yesterday.
In post 316, ZZZX wrote:I know I promised full reads today but I am posting from my 3g as my familly decided today is a good day for a field trip.
a few hours... hopefully... I promise for real! I got a full readlist nearly ready in my pc I have been working on since yesterday.
Micro 350 ended a while back so I can bring this up now.
When I saw both of these I just went "haah"
he was a jester in that game so the smoking gun would be what?
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:23 am
by ZZZX
In post 2206, Titus wrote:Bleh. It's not naked. It could use more and I will be reviewing. Your response is not townie though. You act as if my vote is static when there is another plausible wagon. Saying someone's logic is not naked. So why are you so scared of a vote that may be temporary?
In post 2206, Titus wrote:Bleh. It's not naked. It could use more and I will be reviewing. Your response is not townie though. You act as if my vote is static when there is another plausible wagon. Saying someone's logic is not naked. So why are you so scared of a vote that may be temporary?
because I am like 3-2 votes awayt frmo the lynch
Nothing is really as cathartic as finishing a job:
ZZZX wrote:MafiaSSK : TBC
Thor665 :TBC
Jon_h61 :TBC
Xayzeck :TBC
The Necromancers : I hate this post, [but give no read, therefore TBC]
Titus : TBC
Jordan_Downey :TBC
RachMarie : TBC
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:45 am
by RachMarie
And it is 5 votes to lynch you not 3 or 2.
Instead of whining about your wagon and how you are so close to being lynched, you could like finish your reads yeah, that would be great...
Because it's a boring wagon that had a barely well described premise that no one is functionally pushing. I'd volunteer to push it for you just to show you how it's done, but I honestly feel pretty good with the ZZZX wagon right now.
Which player have you labelled as scum but successfully not voted today?
Hint:
You have developed the counterwagon to this same player.
I will presume the answer is 'Titus'
The real answer is 'a small number of players, of which Titus is one of them - but I can see your intent'
My reply is 'so what?'
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:21 am
by Thor665
Though, actually as currently stands - the answer could equally be Spring even ignoring other comments I've made. But you're voting Titus, so I'm sticking to 'Titus'.
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:33 am
by PeregrineV
In post 2216, Thor665 wrote:I will presume the answer is 'Titus'
The real answer is 'a small number of players, of which Titus is one of them - but I can see your intent'
My reply is 'so what?'
Because when Titus flips scum, then 2059 + 2062 + 2065 + no Titus vote will make you look bad.
If ZZZX flips Goon, then you'll look less bad becasue you bussed, but then Titus=scum PR.
If ZZZX flips badass scum PR, then, and only then, may your Titus stance be safely ignored. (Unless Titus flips badder ass PR.)
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:00 am
by jon_h61
@ ZZZK You still haven't answered the question I asked you about what program you prepared them in. Where are your "to be continued" reads?
@ Mod V/LA through 7/2
Meat World things, not planned.
Right now, I think my votes on scum. So I feel like it'll be giving me dividends while I'm gone.
In post 2216, Thor665 wrote:I will presume the answer is 'Titus'
The real answer is 'a small number of players, of which Titus is one of them - but I can see your intent'
My reply is 'so what?'
Because when Titus flips scum, then 2059 + 2062 + 2065 + no Titus vote will make you look bad.
If ZZZX flips Goon, then you'll look less bad becasue you bussed, but then Titus=scum PR.
If ZZZX flips badass scum PR, then, and only then, may your Titus stance be safely ignored. (Unless Titus flips badder ass PR.)
Ah, so the only way I can possible be town is to just blindly vote Titus...okay...
Hey, Pere?
When ZZZX flips scum, you're going to look bad for not voting him.
If Titus flips scum goon you'll still look bad because then ZZZX will doubtless flip scum PR.
Ah, whatevs, the joke is as stupid as the original commentary,a nd isn't even worth finishing for the slight lulz I'll get from it.
Your comment is silly five ways to Sunday and has no bearing on conversation today and my answer remains the same 'so what?'
