Page 89 of 182
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:24 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Nacho? What do you think about eyestott. What do you think about his reads list from d1?
Eyestott still seems town to me, don't remember his reads list from D1 but lemme check.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:25 pm
by eyestott
And what do you think of my Boonskies case?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:25 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
oh that thing seriously sucked ass yeah
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:25 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:And what do you think of my Boonskies case?
He's not scum.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:25 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
I thought the case looked town though!
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:27 pm
by Murder of Crows
^ f and I have also been talking about that f16 post in skype.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:28 pm
by eyestott
Yeah, looking back at my day 1 reads list, Im really not proud of it.
Nacho, was there anything in my case you disagreed with?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:31 pm
by eyestott
I can sort of understand the reasoning behind F-16s statement, but I dont think it clears him.
I mean, its unlikely that AA9 would quit becuase of a scumbuddy IMO, but its possible. I seriously doubt it was fake anger, and if it was real, surely theyd have talked it out in private, considering the flip of encryptor.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:32 pm
by eyestott
MoC: What character are you?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:33 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:Yeah, looking back at my day 1 reads list, Im really not proud of it.
Nacho, was there anything in my case you disagreed with?
Well, not exactly.
It makes sense to me that when you give someone a "ray" aka a weapon that the person would then be able to use that weapon, whereas if you give them an "item" (a shield, a lightning rod, a deflector) that the item would start protecting them immediately. My real problem with the case is not that any of the reasoning is bad, but rather that I don't think Boonskies's actions come from any scum mindset at all + role makes sense based on how town power seems distributed so far and more inconsistency in already a very inconsistent ISO doesn't really scream scum to me.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:33 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
I also think that I'd really like a massclaim today.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:34 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ Murder of Crows wrote:^ f and I have also been talking about that f16 post in skype.
Where are you sitting on eyestott right now?
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:36 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:Okay then.
I'm for a mass claim, because that's what I think should happen, and that's where my strengths lie:
In Hilariously Unbalanced Mafia, I only really started being useful once everyone had claimed. Once that happened, I was much more efficient at questioning people, as Im much better talking about roles than I am at typical scumhunting.
I guess that makes me a late game player.
Anyways, IIRC, most of my usefulness in this game has been to do with roles.
Once Boonskies claimed, I was one of the big questioners of him.
I decided to call out yonces soft claiming by voting her.
I've just realised that I tend to gravitate towards role related questions over typical questions, so I'm all for a mass claim.
like this post + recent play has actually just been really town
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:39 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
but anyways i want a massclaim because i have an idea about the setup and want to see if claims + reads match up with the end result
what i want more than anything else is cabd stopping being such a useless shit
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:40 pm
by Murder of Crows
↑ eyestott wrote:I can sort of understand the reasoning behind F-16s statement, but I dont think it clears him.
I mean, its unlikely that AA9 would quit becuase of a scumbuddy IMO, but its possible. I seriously doubt it was fake anger, and if it was real, surely theyd have talked it out in private, considering the flip of encryptor.
I don't agree that aa9 wouldn't quit because of a buddy, but more interestingly... on reread I don't really see how gi was arguably why she replaced out. She replaced out after antihero talked about pling her.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:41 pm
by Murder of Crows
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote: ↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Why did you decide to list AA9 as null here when you said a lot of things about them, all of them indicating that you should be scumreading them?
I didn't have as solid a scumread on them as on you and I was convinced it was you + Yonce and maybe one of Mikuru, JesusBuddha, or Medea.
AA9 replacing out because GreyICE got on her nerves pretty much confirms me as town. I'm surprised you missed that and your lack of comment on it. Why?
This is a strange assertion.
You're inside my head again.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:41 pm
by eyestott
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:Yeah, looking back at my day 1 reads list, Im really not proud of it.
Nacho, was there anything in my case you disagreed with?
Well, not exactly.
It makes sense to me that when you give someone a "ray" aka a weapon that the person would then be able to use that weapon, whereas if you give them an "item" (a shield, a lightning rod, a deflector) that the item would start protecting them immediately. My real problem with the case is not that any of the reasoning is bad, but rather that I don't think Boonskies's actions come from any scum mindset at all + role makes sense based on how town power seems distributed so far and more inconsistency in already a very inconsistent ISO doesn't really scream scum to me.
Surely Boonskies wouldve mentioned that as a possibility, or would have asked Bulba to clarify if he saw that as a possibility, right?
I see your point, but I think the role PM would be pretty awkwardly worded:
Youre Dr. Horrible, Town Inventor.
Some of your Inventions will count as gifts, some will take effect on your target.
1:Lightning rod
2: Death ray
3: Freeze ray
4: Shield
5: Deflector
I cant really think of a way he couldve been told that theres a mishmash, without it raising enough confusion to warrant mentioning it in thread.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:42 pm
by Murder of Crows
ffery head is sitting on an uncomfortable town read.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:43 pm
by Murder of Crows
↑ eyestott wrote:MoC: What character are you?
I'm mobile or I'd check. I think I posted it d1. We're some extra in dr. Horrible.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:43 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:Surely Boonskies wouldve mentioned that as a possibility, or would have asked Bulba to clarify if he saw that as a possibility, right?
I don't think this is a safe assumption to make, actually.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:45 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:I see your point, but I think the role PM would be pretty awkwardly worded:
Or:
These are your inventions. You have no idea how they work.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:45 pm
by Murder of Crows
Ok I'm fine with eye for the present moment. I do really want to talk about antihero Today though.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:46 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
I do too!
It's just unfair to Skrew to say too many things about it when I'm a full state away from the apartment.
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:50 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
the one kill per day method was used in ikaruga as well, so it's not a unique rule for this game as i suspected it might be
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 3:51 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ Murder of Crows wrote:Ok I'm fine with eye for the present moment. I do really want to talk about antihero Today though.
and marquis