Page 89 of 287
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:37 am
by Spiffeh
Like look at the wagon composition
All of Ranger, tictac, Axel, and TWL are on that wagon
All of these players have been scummy all game/disappeared when things got down to the wire
Snarky too but he's probably town and needs to be replaced and stop joining larges
I cannot fathom how anyone can support an FS lynch with these facts alone
Not to mention how obvtown they are being
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:38 am
by SirCakez
Because I feel so iffy about Dram due to that game I linked earlier. He's an OK vig shot but I prefer the other two more.
Tictac has been scummy all game and pretty lurky.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:41 am
by Mirhawk
So apparently you've never ever voted for a mislynch? Because unless that's the case then obviously you don't always build rock fucking solid cases.
There's sixteen odd people who apparently do have opinions on the people being voted.
But apparently your thinking fuck them all, my opinions are better then theirs so I'm going to push it to a no lynch.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:42 am
by Mirhawk
Pick a fucking side.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:43 am
by Cerberus v666
↑ Spiffeh wrote:Like look at the wagon composition
All of Ranger, tictac, Axel, and TWL are on that wagon
All of these players have been scummy all game/disappeared when things got down to the wire
Snarky too but he's probably town and needs to be replaced and stop joining larges
I cannot fathom how anyone can support an FS lynch with these facts alone
Not to mention how obvtown they are being
I only see tictac and Axel as questionable there. And Axel being questionable comes from like, some shit from right after i replaced in and I don't even remember what it is. And as I said, tictac is like...not great, but not bad.
↑ SirCakez wrote:Because I feel so iffy about Dram due to that game I linked earlier. He's an OK vig shot but I prefer the other two more.
Tictac has been scummy all game and pretty lurky.
please define the scummy all game part. :-/
pedit: mirhawk, I barely ever vote. So yeah. The number of mislynches I've been on is relatively small. Also, there's a difference between a SOLID TOWN READ. and anything less. I'm willing to vote for anything less to ensure a lynch happens. I'm only willing to PUSH WITH ALL MY POWER something with the level of certainty I described in my previous post.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:44 am
by Spiffeh
Cerb if there is an opportunity to hammer and you don't take it
And this day ends in a no lynch
Needless to say I will be very upset
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:44 am
by podoboq
↑ podoboq wrote: ↑ Cerberus v666 wrote:Like, Spiffeh, i don't vote my townreads. The ONLY time I've ever voted a townread was mastin, at literal deadline, like 1 minute before the day would end, solely to avoid a no lynch.
And she flipped town. And she wasn't a strong townread, like Ranger is.
:/
Which doesn't mean i'm right this time, but it DOES show you how unwilling I am to vote for my townreads.
I understand this logic, and at the end, you are making your own decision.
I'm just saying that you have to pick between FS, Ranger, and nolynch. Between those three options, which would you prefer?
This question has not been answered. I'm going to bold it.
@Cerb: Which would you rather happen: Lynch Ranger. Lynch Friendless Seniors. No lynch.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:47 am
by Cerberus v666
They're both town, I wish I had been around more to actually figure that out 4 days ago and work harder to get you lynched.
Well, actually, I'm not particularly sure about you(hence the lack of a push), but yeah. Somebody else, other than them. Cause competing town wagons just leads us down a path where we get to mislynch FS tomorrow after Ranger flips town. :-/
podo: .000000000001% chance I'll vote ranger to hammer them at the last minute. So, in order of preference: NL/R/FS
It's not going to come down to me having to make that choice though.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:47 am
by Cerberus v666
↑ Spiffeh wrote:Cerb if there is an opportunity to hammer and you don't take it
And this day ends in a no lynch
Needless to say I will be very upset
Yeah. I doubt it'll come down to that.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:48 am
by SirCakez
Re:tictac - Little scumhunting, few pushes, just generally weak posts.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:50 am
by Spiffeh
↑ Cerberus v666 wrote: ↑ Spiffeh wrote:Cerb if there is an opportunity to hammer and you don't take it
And this day ends in a no lynch
Needless to say I will be very upset
Yeah. I doubt it'll come down to that.
One more vote for Ranger and it will come to that
So I would say it's very likely
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:51 am
by Cerberus v666
↑ Spiffeh wrote: ↑ Cerberus v666 wrote: ↑ Spiffeh wrote:Cerb if there is an opportunity to hammer and you don't take it
And this day ends in a no lynch
Needless to say I will be very upset
Yeah. I doubt it'll come down to that.
One more vote for Ranger and it will come to that
So I would say it's very likely
No, it would need to be her sitting at L-1 for 4 hours+, because you already know the only way there is any chance of me voting her is at the last second, if it's literally the choice between NL and Ranger.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:53 am
by Mirhawk
You're horrible.
Without a lynch day two is just going to be day one part two. We still won't have any real information.
Also, Seniors has a confirmable role, so it's not going to instantly rebound onto him.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:53 am
by Spiffeh
I'd hope you'd realize at that point how ridiculous that was and not even RISK a no lynch
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:54 am
by SirCakez
At this point it is basically NL or Ranger
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:56 am
by podoboq
As far as I'm concerned, a vote for NL is basically a scum claim.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:57 am
by hiplop
↑ Spiffeh wrote:Cerb if there is an opportunity to hammer and you don't take it
And this day ends in a no lynch
Needless to say I will be very upset
if that happens I don't think I want to play with cerb again honestly. I'd rather die than see him fencesit any longer
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:57 am
by Friendless Seniors
↑ podoboq wrote:As far as I'm concerned, a vote for NL is basically a scum claim.
ya that
↑ hiplop wrote: ↑ Spiffeh wrote:Cerb if there is an opportunity to hammer and you don't take it
And this day ends in a no lynch
Needless to say I will be very upset
if that happens I don't think I want to play with cerb again honestly. I'd rather die than see him fencesit any longer
pickup
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:58 am
by podoboq
I'm also not confident in Ranger as scum, I'm not even sure I would put the odds >= 50%, but I at least recognize that NL is WORSE than a mislynch, especially on Ranger. Bite the bullet and make the hard decision.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:00 am
by Friendless Seniors
I apologize for thinking podo was scum
this is a very town mindset
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:00 am
by podoboq
Leaving for pregaming now. I'll be checking in infrequently on phone.
Cerb, don't be useless.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:01 am
by Spiffeh
hippy other than Ranger who are your scum reads?
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:01 am
by Cerberus v666
↑ podoboq wrote:Leaving for pregaming now. I'll be checking in infrequently on phone.
Cerb, don't be useless.
Oh, I won't be, no matter what.
You all do realize there are other people than myself who could easily appear and vote, yes?
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:05 am
by Mirhawk
So you're okay with it as long as someone other than you does it?
Also, you're here now. Waiting for others who may or may not show up is stupid.
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:06 am
by Friendless Seniors
↑ Spiffeh wrote:hippy other than Ranger who are your scum reads?
I'll give you my "possibly scum" list. So nullscum-> scumread
Axel, Cerb, Tammy? could be scum here/davesaz, Tictac, potentially pied piper? Nacho seems town, plot not so much