Page 89 of 257
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:11 am
by Boem_u_dusi
In post 2197, Wake1 wrote: In post 2196, Boem_u_dusi wrote:
OK do whatever you want, but I have never seen someone suddenly starting to engage more just because somebody told them to. And who established you as an activity policeman?
I will say and do what I want, when I want.
And I have seen players engage more when called out on it.
Don't even try to say I'm an 'activity policeman' (whatever the fuck that is) for wanting certain players to participate in the game more.
Stop being anti-Town and finding excuses for players not to play the game.
And where did I do that
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:12 am
by Zachstralkita
S/o Wake for not pointing out how I was inconsistent
Dunnstral wrote:
~ I ask in
2170 for confirmation that
Wake88
is willing to lynch
Sickofit1138
and
Vedith
Day 1.
Wake88
hesitantly replies 'Yes' to both in
2190.
LMFAO
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:14 am
by Wake1
In post 2199, Dunnstral wrote:
~ I ask in
2170 for confirmation that
Wake88
is willing to lynch
Sickofit1138
and
Vedith
Day 1.
Wake88
hesitantly
replies 'Yes' to both in
2190.
Don't be underhanded.
I'm willing to lynch that slot today but I haven't ISO'd him so in spite of willing to lynch him I'm not certain he's Scum. I haven't ISO'd Vedith either.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:14 am
by Lapsa
In post 2136, Vedith wrote:Then I asked Lapsa why he was voting Titus - The reason was valid.
lies, i hadn't voted titus
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:15 am
by Titus
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:15 am
by Boem_u_dusi
Well, it's not like you have to ISO Zach. Their ISO's are very short and rather uninspiring.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:16 am
by Boem_u_dusi
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:20 am
by Lapsa
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:21 am
by Titus
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:22 am
by Lapsa
voting != voted
Titus, you are dumb
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:24 am
by Titus
VOTE: Lapsa
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:25 am
by Dunnstral
VOTE: Lapsa
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:26 am
by Wake1
Lapsa, thoughts on these four now going after you?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:26 am
by PeregrineV
See, I'm glad I isoed Almost50.
Vote: Almost50
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:26 am
by Boem_u_dusi
This look like an overreaction.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:27 am
by Wake1
Wait, how many are voting Lapsa?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:27 am
by Boem_u_dusi
What's the reasoning behind this except voting for you?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:27 am
by PeregrineV
Well, wth.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:27 am
by Wake1
Peregrine, please share with me and and all thoughts you have thus far.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:29 am
by Zachstralkita
Um.......
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:30 am
by Wake1
Earth to PV we're past 2200 posts I need more than just a naked vote on someone who voted you come on now.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:31 am
by Boem_u_dusi
That was ... awkward from PeregrineV.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:31 am
by Zachstralkita
Boem_u_dusi wrote:That was ... awkward from PeregrineV.
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:34 am
by PeregrineV
Lack of content in his first 22 posts.
First "real" case was against Dunnstral for vote hopping. That cases is quantified and color-coded in
325. Response in
333.
and
Voting me, outside of RVS, and for no given reason.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:37 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 2223, PeregrineV wrote:
Lack of content in his first 22 posts.
First "real" case was against Dunnstral for vote hopping. That cases is quantified and color-coded in
325. Response in
333.
and
Voting me, outside of RVS, and for no given reason.
This seems bad. What about ... his other posts?