Mafiascum.net

In post 2197, Flea The Magician wrote:ebwop i guess?

In post 2186, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 2179, Titus wrote:Scumhunting varies from player to player.

I'm not "bending over backwards" trying to explain that principle. You've been stubborn and bullheaded. You're picking fights because people don't think like you. First Gamma and now Manatee.

Yes. This summarisation of her opinion on the votes on her is scumhunting. THIS IS CLEARLY SARCASM, AS THE FOLLOWING QUOTE CONTAINS ABSOLUTELY NO SCUMHUNTING WHATSOEVER AND IS IN FACT - AS STATED - A SUMMARISATION OF HER OPINION ON THE VOTES ON HER.

In post 2056, ManateeGal wrote:Bee vote on me i think is pretty good. The intention feels genuine and I think their desire for a new wagon reads as pretty towny in general.
Gamma's vote is ???? Im pretty sure they were already scumreading me so im not sure why they used bee starting a pressure wagon as the time to lay down a vote
the worst had a naked vote,, which makes sense and is fine with meeeeeee. not much 2 read in to here.
Thor said my iso sent shivers down his spine which is fair,,, cos same im not proud of what ive done so far.
i dont think flea really thinks my frozen-ness here is comparable to NQN (i think thats what fae is talking abt). not a fan of that vote cos i think those scenarios are pretty different.
pp naked vote is fine.

In post 2199, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2192, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2188, Titus wrote:

In post 2185, House wrote:Naked votes are perfectly okay, but a player that scumreads her dropping a vote on her is sus?

GTFO.

@Gamma/House, To be clear, I don't think you're scummy for pushing this.

I don't think Manatee is scum either for FoSing someone pushing a wrong case but townreading the people caught up in it. I'm not even necessarily agreeing with Manatee's theory, especially because I TR Gamma really hard. I can just see it coming from town who knows their play sucked but suspects scum is overselling it.

That seems ass-backwards to me, I’d expect the reasonable approach to be townreading the one pushing but scumreading those following without explaining why adequately
As I wrote this I also realized the shade on me wasn’t even because I suspected her but because I followed Bee. Like, WHAT?

To expand on this, the actual thought process for me when I voted manatee was that it was a sweet spot of someone I suspected and someone I was aware there was momentum for. Up until I voted manatee I was holding my peace as I didn’t want to go on someone just for the momentum to not be there. And following that vote I had suggested Bee could be scum with Manatee because of how her idea of what to do in the case Manatee didn’t respond to pressure like she wanted was to drop it. Honestly that might have been why Manatee opted to shade me.

In post 2179, Titus wrote:

In post 2176, House wrote:

In post 2174, Titus wrote:

In post 2168, House wrote:Also, if she was accepting naked votes because "she knew her play was weak", there is no justification for her to shade Gamma's vote on her.

She's scumhunting. She can be suspicious of some votes and not others. Sure we hate naked votes but not every player needs to.

They do if they're "scumhunting".

You can't give her credit for scumhunting Gamma and a pass for NOT scumhunting naked votes when it all happened in the same post.

You're being disingenuous & bending over backwards to explain away transparently scummy behavior.

Scumhunting varies from player to player.

I'm not "bending over backwards" trying to explain that principle. You've been stubborn and bullheaded. You're picking fights because people don't think like you. First Gamma and now Manatee.

In post 2202, Flea The Magician wrote:I'll be sure to make sure all future sarcasm is fully noted for you Gamma.

/s

In post 2204, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why presume that this is how ManateeGal scumhunts as town? Is there something about her posting that you see as +town in a vacuum?

In post 2205, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is kinda random, but would people be amenable to a Bee wagon? I feel like she hasn’t really gotten much pressure this game

In post 2208, Titus wrote:

In post 2204, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why presume that this is how ManateeGal scumhunts as town? Is there something about her posting that you see as +town in a vacuum?

It makes sense to me. I don't have to agree with it, but if I can make logical sense of it without a scum agenda, it's likely town. We're all mostly town.

In post 2205, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2202, Flea The Magician wrote:I'll be sure to make sure all future sarcasm is fully noted for you Gamma.

/s

I still feel like Auro/Flea/Thor yields at best one scum
This is kinda random, but would people be amenable to a Bee wagon? I feel like she hasn’t really gotten much pressure this game

In post 2212, the worst wrote:we can do bee d2

In post 2187, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:MG also said she would be here all day. Where did she go?

In post 2215, the worst wrote:don't think we need elitell to ping manatee as scum atp

i've been listening to you, titus. hear you loud and clear. i do think we need to spend more time sorting slots like bee, auro, pp, likely yourself. none of those are names i expect to have a confident read on d1.

In post 2081, the worst wrote:

In post 2076, ManateeGal wrote:realization: isoing does very little to help me develop a read

Just read the last handful of pages and let me know what you think of people's tone/input without all context. That's a start.

In post 2213, Titus wrote:

In post 2212, the worst wrote:we can do bee d2

Or we can listen to me D2

In post 2056, ManateeGal wrote:i dont think flea really thinks my frozen-ness here is comparable to NQN (i think thats what fae is talking abt). not a fan of that vote cos i think those scenarios are pretty different.

In post 2222, ManateeGal wrote:VOTE: flea