Page 90 of 257
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:39 am
by PeregrineV
In post 2218, Wake1 wrote:
Peregrine, please share with me and and all thoughts you have thus far.
Sure, granted I skipped the middle 60 or so pages.
AGar *- nothing
Lapsa - finds Almost50 town, which I find scummy
Almost50 - No content
Dunnstral - town
Zachstralkita -town
shannon - nothing
Sickofit1138 - scummy
Mirhawk SuddenlyARabbit - I think town, from first 7 pages. Didn;t see anything inlast 5
Airick10- nothing
Performer Nero Cain - I think townish
Transcend -townshish
PeregrineV - so town they could name the town after me
Boem_u_dusi - town. I liek thim.
podoboq - nothing
Wake88 * - Nothing ealry pages, but I feel liek I can read you pretty easily. I like your last 5 pages of posting, but disagree with your Titus townead.
Varsoon * - nothing, but never a good cohoice (to me) for a day1 lynch.
Titus - maybe town (see Wake read)
implosion - bad vibes early game. nothing form recent pages
Nosferatu - nothing
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:39 am
by Wake1
I'm feeling underwhelmed.
I desire to kill things and all I have near me are reuben sandwiches.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:41 am
by PeregrineV
In post 2224, Zachstralkita wrote: In post 2223, PeregrineV wrote:
Lack of content in his first 22 posts.
First "real" case was against Dunnstral for vote hopping. That cases is quantified and color-coded in
325. Response in
333.
and
Voting me, outside of RVS, and for no given reason.
This seems bad. What about ... his other posts?
I claim that his first 22 posts are crap. You are welcome to quote them all, and point out the non-crap elements. Otherwise, pretend I just quoted them and called them crap.
After his first 22, he presents some sort of scumhunting, but it looks like too much effort to point out that Dunnstral votes early and often. And concludes he's not scum. Until a few posts later he is scum. Until I am.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:42 am
by Zachstralkita
That's all well and good, but I daresay he's not a viable lynch for today.
I also find him town, does that make me scummy as well?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:43 am
by PeregrineV
In post 2226, Wake1 wrote:I'm feeling underwhelmed.
I desire to kill things and all I have near me are reuben sandwiches.
Sorry. It's day1. I'm not lynching Titus unless you have more than semantics and lynch all liars.
At least she is scumhunting, presenting reads, and making herself readable.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:43 am
by PeregrineV
In post 2228, Zachstralkita wrote:That's all well and good, but I daresay he's not a viable lynch for today.
I also find him town, does that make me scummy as well?
Why?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:44 am
by Dunnstral
What game are we in right now
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:44 am
by Zachstralkita
PeregrineV wrote: In post 2228, Zachstralkita wrote:That's all well and good, but I daresay he's not a viable lynch for today.
I also find him town, does that make me scummy as well?
Why?
I thought his then-case on Dunnstral came from quite a towny place.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:44 am
by Wake1
PV based on what you know can you make your own copy of my
1946 so we can have a better understanding of where you're at?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:44 am
by Dunnstral
nvm did he replace out
Peregrine did you see the mason stuff?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:45 am
by Zachstralkita
Also Wake, you're free to tell me how I'm inconsistent whenever you want. Or just admit I'm not.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:46 am
by Zachstralkita
@Dunnstral case Lapsa for me please, don't make me have to ask for the reasons 1000 times like he did
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:46 am
by Dunnstral
same reasons as implosion I'd reckon
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:46 am
by PeregrineV
In post 2228, Zachstralkita wrote:That's all well and good, but I daresay he's not a viable lynch for today.
I also find him town, does that make me scummy as well?
You found him town ever since page 5. Perhaps you should explain why.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:47 am
by Lapsa
parking my vote on titus
have fun
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:49 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 2238, PeregrineV wrote: In post 2228, Zachstralkita wrote:That's all well and good, but I daresay he's not a viable lynch for today.
I also find him town, does that make me scummy as well?
You found him town ever since page 5. Perhaps you should explain why.
Okie-doke. Maybe it's the ostrich weakening my resolve, but I feel his tone is town overall and his greatest crime is maybe not ACTIVELY scumhunting. I can see why the slot needs pressure.
Lapsa wrote:parking my vote on titus
have fun
this does not help your case
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:49 am
by Titus
So many words I cannot say right now...
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:49 am
by Lapsa
also - won't defend myself, won't answer any questions
will prod dodge and occasionally remind that titus is dumb
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:51 am
by Zachstralkita
Lapsa wrote:also - won't defend myself, won't answer any questions
will prod dodge and occasionally remind that titus is dumb
Yeah, and now you're intentionally being unhelpful. I don't see a reason to keep you here.
Can someone familiar with Lapsa tell me if he's normally like this?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:51 am
by PeregrineV
Sickofit1138
Almost50
implosion
Lapsa
shannon
Airick10
Vedith
AGar
podoboq
Mirhawk
Varsoon
Transcend
Zachstralkita
Performer
Boem_u_dusi
Dunnstral
Wake
Titus
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:52 am
by Dunnstral
As a lapsa alt I can confirm he is not normally like this
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:52 am
by Dunnstral
OK Peregrine is probably town to be honest...
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:53 am
by Zachstralkita
I hate you.
He's made like 4-5 posts since he came back and you just label him town. You give out townreads too easy.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:54 am
by PeregrineV
Not directly but saw this
In post 1969, Wake1 wrote:So, to recap:
~ Titus claimed Mason and named Dunn, causing Dunn to go along with it.
~ T&D backlash ensues.
~ Zach and Varsoon counterclaim Masons.
~ Z&D mention Night talk. T&D say they have Daytalk.
~ Wake comes.
~ Z&D recant. Wake questions T&D about Mason PT data.
~ T&D recant.
~ So T&D and Z&D recant being Masons. So there are no current Mason PTs. Meaning T&D couldn't answer questions about PT specs.
I presumed Z&D was supposed to be Z&V.
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:54 am
by Dunnstral
That's like
Almost my exact reads mirrored there
a little rearranging but yeah