Mafiascum.net

In post 2228, beeboy wrote:Wisdom we don't have 4 masons either.

VOTE: RedFlavor

I am ok with pressuring this slot.

In post 2217, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 63, Sudowoodo wrote:Obviously.

Hush now.

In post 66, Sudowoodo wrote:Nico, I'd actually prefer if you didn't answer any more questions for a little while.

Trust me here.

In post 157, Sudowoodo wrote:I just remembered that fucking multiquote doesn’t work on mobile fuck me.
The only reads I have atm are Wis town and
VOTE: LLD
^^That^^

Fucking kill me

In post 174, Sudowoodo wrote:Wis is it because I got you to TR me twice as a wolf
Because those feelings get into your head when that happens

In post 205, Sudowoodo wrote:

In post 197, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 191, Sudowoodo wrote:

In post 182, Wisdom wrote:

In post 180, Sudowoodo wrote:Honestly
The most wolfy person is the one that is pushing EDDIE CANE for their claim
So can we lynch that please, because its a really scummy push
Ty <3

She stopped pushing him

does that really change the nature of the push?

—

In post 185, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 180, Sudowoodo wrote:Honestly
The most wolfy person is the one that is pushing EDDIE CANE for their claim
So can we lynch that please, because its a really scummy push
Ty <3

But I'm not?

My initial reaction was that Eddie was scum, and then we talked about it... and now we have a better understanding of how we should play around the claim.

honestly, the way you backed out of it seems like how a wolf would back out of a push it feels too much like trying to maintain a solid push rather then a push that’s right

you are Pine and Alisae, so I cannot believe you are saying this with a straight face.

I don't back down from pushes... like... ever.

This was a scenario where the more I talked it out and considered everything, the more I felt my gut reaction was incorrect and chose to pick a different path. I still feel like my analysis of the likelyhood of things being put in this game was ok, but I also feel like my plan solves my concerns and I'm MORE than happy to give people rope to work with when they agree to be slated for death?

ik it feels wolfy and unnatural I'm sorry

In post 212, Sudowoodo wrote:

In post 210, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 206, Wisdom wrote:The thing is, when youre pushing your read, you dont think of all that
I insist on this because i often push unpopular reads and its rare ill back down even if people come up with the most logical arguments
So you getting convinced and backing down there feels unnatural

what really annoys me is generally you'd be right, but my vote restriction and other stuff kind of force/make me want to play slightly differently?

Mechanically, this made more sense, and my only scum inclination on Eddie WAS the claim at the time.

I got what I wanted from it (reactions from Eddie and players around Eddie, a deal that people should follow because it makes sense to counteract the negatives of Eddie's role claim, conversation on why I felt that role was scummy) and then decided there wasn't anything else there that couldn't be solved with this plan.

I've been doing this recently, where I take players with claims like that and give them ultimatuum on "time to live" and it's like: Perform well or die?

So um
am I going crazy or does this read as dishonest to anyone? Because it reads as dishonest to me.

tbh the fact that I wolfread LLD is making me think I'm crazy but if wis and Cheeky share my concern maybe its not just me.

Things like this? If you want me to go through each one individually and explain why I felt it was :goodposting: I can.

In post 2236, CheekyTeeky wrote:Sudo you should also say who you're passing to just before day end incase you're NK.

In post 2240, Sudowoodo wrote:We haven't discussed it, but I was thinking you, fren.

In post 2242, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 2240, Sudowoodo wrote:We haven't discussed it, but I was thinking you, fren.

Any attempts to give me stuff gets refunded apparently.

In post 2246, Pine wrote:

In post 2242, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 2240, Sudowoodo wrote:We haven't discussed it, but I was thinking you, fren.

Any attempts to give me stuff gets refunded apparently.

Hmm. I was under the impression it would only matter if we were given back something we'd handed out.

In that case, one of the Masons. Bee, maybe. Fitting.

In post 2246, Pine wrote:

In post 2242, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 2240, Sudowoodo wrote:We haven't discussed it, but I was thinking you, fren.

Any attempts to give me stuff gets refunded apparently.

Hmm. I was under the impression it would only matter if we were given back something we'd handed out.

In that case, one of the Masons. Bee, maybe. Fitting.

In post 2244, MOMOMEN wrote:^^KTS

but I approve

-Eddie

Cheeky. Can you confirm Sudo's alignment as town? Yes or no. I don't care about their role, I believe their claim.