Mafiascum.net

Votecount 1.10

Alduskkel (3) -

PookyTheMagicalBear, dsjstr, Datisi

PookyTheMagicalBear (2) -

Alduskkel, Raven Branwen

skitter30 (1) -

the worst

Raven Branwen (1) -

skitter30

Not Voting (2) -

Something_Smart, lilith2013

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to eliminate.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2020-08-11 09:20:00).

In post 1983, lilith2013 wrote:VOTE: skitter

In post 1987, lilith2013 wrote:UNVOTE:

i can vote aldu to like move things along but i would like to reiterate that i strongly believe raven to be scum

Um I’m mostly waiting for raven’s catchup at this point

ok hear me out, i have a 100% ev ez pz town win plan

first we execute skitter

if she scum gg we got one
if she town we just chain execute all of duck/raven/aldus

this post is 75% sarcastic

great plan

Sorry guys, I wasn’t feeling well yesterday, still am , so I’ll try my best considering. @Skitter, if you think I’m scum based off my perfectly legit reasons for initially tl you. I’m not anymore btw and I was thinking about that all last night.

Lillith doesn’t know my main but YOU do as does duckling, SS and apparently Datisi if he’s corrrect. Any one of you can metacheck me to either vetify or debunk what I said to Lillith, which is that you are sr me for something that is 100% NAI.

i hope you feel better soon!

and i still feel like ur initial tl on me was quite suspect, tbh

In post 2225, Micc wrote:

Votecount 1.10

Alduskkel (3) -

PookyTheMagicalBear, dsjstr, Datisi

PookyTheMagicalBear (2) -

Alduskkel, Raven Branwen

skitter30 (1) -

the worst

Raven Branwen (1) -

skitter30

Not Voting (2) -

Something_Smart, lilith2013

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to eliminate.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2020-08-11 09:20:00).

Something_Smart is V/LA until 8/10.

UNVOTE:

In post 2233, skitter30 wrote:i hope you feel better soon!

and i still feel like ur initial tl on me was quite suspect, tbh

Ty but I honestly don’t see why because when I first repped into the game, I thought that duckling was like 78% scum, I don’t think that anymore because he has made a compelling case and since dialed down his push on you but hasn’t changed his vote to anyone else. I still think you sound more sincere here than in those two games he linked but then I remember that att, I locktown read you in tm.

I’m somewhat paranoid about your unwillingness to push tw, because it’s “unpleasant”. When do you think that it would ever be pleasant? And now you’re linking me and Alsus? Based on what exactly? What pings me is that you didn’t say you have independent reasons for sr us both but that you thought we were buddies, when you earlier posted that you were suspicious of all of the you/Aldus scumreads. how do you not see the obvious contradiction in doing that to me?

i have independant reasons to sr both of you, and additionally i think that you have partner-y associatives, so i'm not sure what you're accusing me of there
furthermore i've elaborated on all of those things in the past few pages ^

and i don't know why tw *not* pushing me is town-indicative for him

Skitter, are you no longer scumreading duck?

i am but i feel like it's lower priority rn

In post 1957, skitter30 wrote:i also do want pooky to elaborate on why he thinks me/aldu associatives would look like this given how coalition went down

i think there's scum in the people pushing/leaning into this narrative
and i may or may not have been playing it up a bit to see what how the narrative around that associative would develop

This is why I’m no longer tl you.

In post 2236, skitter30 wrote:i have independant reasons to sr both of you, and additionally i think that you have partner-y associatives, so i'm not sure what you're accusing me of there
furthermore i've elaborated on all of those things in the past few pages ^

and i don't know why tw *not* pushing me is town-indicative for him

Humour me, I want to hear more about these alleged “associatives” and how is that metacheck on me coming along?

In post 2240, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 2236, skitter30 wrote:i have independant reasons to sr both of you, and additionally i think that you have partner-y associatives, so i'm not sure what you're accusing me of there
furthermore i've elaborated on all of those things in the past few pages ^

and i don't know why tw *not* pushing me is town-indicative for him

Humour me, I want to hear more about these alleged “associatives” and how is that metacheck on me coming along?

Because unlike you, who seems to be doing everything possible to avoid voting him, he has stayed consistent and isn’t looking for other wagons to push because it’s “unpleasant”.

The main reason I tl you was because you called our the you/Aldus associatives as scummy. On D1 in Lunacy, when you wrongly thought you were scum. you kept pushing the me/Nahdia are a scumteam thing, so it reads to me like you could be doing that again here.

sorry, I'm not following the logic between those two statements. Can you explain what the difference is

In post 2242, Raven Branwen wrote:The main reason I tl you was because you called our the you/Aldus associatives as scummy. On D1 in Lunacy, when you wrongly thought you were scum. you kept pushing the me/Nahdia are a scumteam thing, so it reads to me like you could be doing that again here.

Also, it highlights the difference between you and Lillith who looks as though she’s genuinely trying to sort me. Her play is very different here than it was on D1 in Lunacy when you both thought you were scum but your play here is looking similar, except I know I’m not scum here, so I’m trying to make some sense of this. Are you confibiasing me and deathtunnelling me like you did in that game we argued about in our Lunacy PT or scum making a bad faith push. I still don’t know but your only reason for pushing me is that you found my initial tl on you suspicious but you can easily verify whether or not that read is valid or not and whether what I said to Lillith is true or not, so why aren’t you doing that?

In post 2240, Raven Branwen wrote:Humour me, I want to hear more about these alleged “associatives” and how is that metacheck on me coming along?

2196

and again this isn't a meta-based read, it's based on what you've done this game, and i don't think the meta you're citing is relevant, so i'm not planning on checking it

In post 2243, lilith2013 wrote:sorry, I'm not following the logic between those two statements. Can you explain what the difference is

In Lunacy, she kept pushing that me/Nahdia buddy thing, so her calling doing that with her/Aldus as scummy, read townie to me because without flips, that sort of thing reads to me like chainsawing but now she’s literally doing the exact same thing to me that she earlier considered scummy when it was being done to her. I don’t understand how she doesn’t see how that looks scummy and she has literally given no other reason for sr me than something that is easily verifiable as 100% NAI for me, if she actually bothered to metacheck me.

In post 2244, Raven Branwen wrote:Also, it highlights the difference between you and Lillith who looks as though she’s genuinely trying to sort me.

isn't she agreeing with me that she thinks the things i'm calling out as scummy are scummy? i don't get it

In post 2196, skitter30 wrote:- i think he has partner-equity with raven (i do prefer raven over aldu)
- i've been waiting for a while for like ~content~ which hasn't happened
- he feels like he's flailing rn
- his reads are Disappointing
- don't like his sudden turn onto tw

Yes you THINK this but WHY do you think this? You thinking something isn’t a case, when you don’t bother to explain it.

i mean are you trying to argue that i'm partnered with aldu? otherwise i don't know what you're trying to say in 2246