Mafiascum.net

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

i was watching anime

there is no universe in which i target flow here - like literally ndmath prob realized it doesnt look good for him or its like some stupid ass gambit and they're going to correct the result in a second.

also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

In post 2146, flow trap wrote:Scum won't kill me if there's a watcher on me. If they do pog

In post 2147, VFP wrote:If I'm a watcher, I'll be on you like a hawk tonight, Flow!

Search the thread for watcher
It loads backwards it was said repeatedly

In post 2224, Robert M Hunter wrote:

In post 2217, MathBlade wrote:I mean we literally said watchers on flow.

What happened with that?

Imagine I am Koba.
I read the thread ...Hmmm watcher on flow.
Yeah I will have the least scumread player of our team kill flow.

I don’t see how scum kills flow here unless it’s intentional

I also don’t see a world where one of them is not scum.

So I am paranoid of a gambit where both are scum.

In post 2227, DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

You should be claiming.

yes my plan as scum is to a)try to divert a wagon on d1 on town b) help push a wagon away from probable town onto scum that ended up scumslipping, and also not explaining the way the setup works in scum pt

In post 2230, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2227, DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

You should be claiming.

I don't frankly need to actually unless ndmath wants to hardclaim or retract their claim.

In post 2232, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2230, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2227, DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

You should be claiming.

I don't frankly need to actually unless ndmath wants to hardclaim or retract their claim.

1 shot watcher sounds like a hard claim to me Koba.

So yes pretty sure you need to claim

In post 2229, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2224, Robert M Hunter wrote:

In post 2217, MathBlade wrote:I mean we literally said watchers on flow.

What happened with that?

Imagine I am Koba.
I read the thread ...Hmmm watcher on flow.
Yeah I will have the least scumread player of our team kill flow.

I don’t see how scum kills flow here unless it’s intentional

I also don’t see a world where one of them is not scum.

So I am paranoid of a gambit where both are scum.

this is ridiculous moon logic can you stop with this?

In post 2233, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2232, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2230, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2227, DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

You should be claiming.

I don't frankly need to actually unless ndmath wants to hardclaim or retract their claim.

1 shot watcher sounds like a hard claim to me Koba.

So yes pretty sure you need to claim

I know that result is fake so I'm asking NDmath to hardclaim their result.

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

In post 2231, DkKoba wrote:yes my plan as scum is to a)try to divert a wagon on d1 on town b) help push a wagon away from probable town onto scum that ended up scumslipping, and also not explaining the way the setup works in scum pt

The latter was probably an genuine a50 mistake not a lack of explanation. Or was an intentional slip when it was realized he was going down over a50 or yes.

A50 is a smart scum

oh wait mathblade, you totally forgot, i'm totally the one leading the kill here as scum!!

yes 100%


me over anyone else here that is my theoretical scum partner here.

i cant believe you didnt have doubt over this claim and rather just immediately went into "what if this is svs?"

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watched

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

lmao ok then u can die tomorrow. Let's extend this day and sees who taps out because I know its you whos gonna be obvious by the end trying their hardest to seem genuine and not antispew ((((:

In post 2238, DkKoba wrote:oh wait mathblade, you totally forgot, i'm totally the one leading the kill here as scum!!

yes 100%


me over anyone else here that is my theoretical scum partner here.

i cant believe you didnt have doubt over this claim and rather just immediately went into "what if this is svs?"

I did and still do actually.

I said either neither made sense.

Koba claim

In post 2239, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watched

shhh make it seem like they have a chance to see if they end up spewing some teammates.

poor them shouldn't have confirmed themselves 100% scum from my pov.


now i can hunt for your partner without having to guess both

In post 2239, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watched

I means from scumteam's perspective odds are there isn't a watcher. Koba probably thought they could still force an elim on andante or something.

In post 2241, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2238, DkKoba wrote:oh wait mathblade, you totally forgot, i'm totally the one leading the kill here as scum!!

yes 100%


me over anyone else here that is my theoretical scum partner here.

i cant believe you didnt have doubt over this claim and rather just immediately went into "what if this is svs?"

I did and still do actually.

I said either neither made sense.

Koba claim

that can be a surprise later - if you're gonna rush my elimination here then you're playing anti-town because we ASBSOLUTELY should take the time to talk when we have a nice old 50/50 going on here.

also my claim doesnt matter here - its either me or ndmath. im not gonna pretend like you think a claim is gonna make me more "credible" when scum were able to easily get their own PR roles clearly

In post 2242, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2239, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watched

shhh make it seem like they have a chance to see if they end up spewing some teammates.

poor them shouldn't have confirmed themselves 100% scum from my pov.


now i can hunt for your partner without having to guess both

I can’t have a partner lol

In post 2243, NDMath wrote:

In post 2239, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watched

I means from scumteam's perspective odds are there isn't a watcher. Koba probably thought they could still force an elim on andante or something.

who's my partner?

In post 2245, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2242, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2239, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2236, NDMath wrote:

In post 2222, MathBlade wrote:What really damns Koba is they disappeared.

We know they were online from trying to clear me.

Makes the ND+Koba combo viable here if it’s intentional

I'm confused what of this makes you think S/S.

DkKoba wrote:also if ndmath wants to hardclaim, cool, but we aren't speedvoting me here because I am town and i want to use the discussion time.

Yes it's a hardclaim

Because I don’t see why Koba scum kills someone being watched

shhh make it seem like they have a chance to see if they end up spewing some teammates.

poor them shouldn't have confirmed themselves 100% scum from my pov.


now i can hunt for your partner without having to guess both

I can’t have a partner lol

i forgot halfway which math i was responding to lmao

In post 2244, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2241, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2238, DkKoba wrote:oh wait mathblade, you totally forgot, i'm totally the one leading the kill here as scum!!

yes 100%


me over anyone else here that is my theoretical scum partner here.

i cant believe you didnt have doubt over this claim and rather just immediately went into "what if this is svs?"

I did and still do actually.

I said either neither made sense.

Koba claim

that can be a surprise later - if you're gonna rush my elimination here then you're playing anti-town because we ASBSOLUTELY should take the time to talk when we have a nice old 50/50 going on here.

also my claim doesnt matter here - its either me or ndmath. im not gonna pretend like you think a claim is gonna make me more "credible" when scum were able to easily get their own PR roles clearly

I am actually trying to prevent your speed elim and sort you both

nahh but ndmath really thought that he could frame me as:

leading kill

killing flow trap

not killing mathblade

like no?