Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 1:36 am
Also mine?
Tell me moreIn post 2199, Bellaphant wrote:I actually share 2/3 of your other scum reads, so this point bugs me.
Lmao that'd explain it to be fairIn post 2224, Roden wrote:What do you mean? Have we played together before?In post 2220, The toad wrote: And again you should know I'm not the kind of player who can only lurk as scum and can't look town. What's up with that?
I don't really get what you mean by "my treatment of you" either, I just think your posts have been scummy. I don't really have any questions I want to ask you, and I'm not particularly interested in casing you, I preferred Frog and now Ceph over you and I can just get to you on a day I consider you a higher priority. It's the same reason I'm not going after C&G atm even though I scum read them and have a case set aside in my drafts. I don't want to juggle multiple cases on Day 1 when it's already overwhelming enough to keep up with everything else in the game.
I am interested in how you react to my scum read though, that's basically my way of sorting you in the meantime. Because as it is now, you didn't really have an opinion on me at all until you were asked to. I think you had me at Null for Pooky's read list request, which implies that my read on you didn't factor much into your own reads for the longest time.
Not too keen on this post. I've been suspicious of Toad at times but I think they asked you some fairly reasonable questions and this feels like an evasive response - why would you not be interested in potentially casing or questioning someone who you think is mafia? If you think Toad is scum, then you've got a perfect chance here to explore that idea further, especially when it appears to be a thought you've had pretty consistently.In post 2224, Roden wrote:What do you mean? Have we played together before?In post 2220, The toad wrote: And again you should know I'm not the kind of player who can only lurk as scum and can't look town. What's up with that?
I don't really get what you mean by "my treatment of you" either, I just think your posts have been scummy. I don't really have any questions I want to ask you, and I'm not particularly interested in casing you, I preferred Frog and now Ceph over you and I can just get to you on a day I consider you a higher priority. It's the same reason I'm not going after C&G atm even though I scum read them and have a case set aside in my drafts. I don't want to juggle multiple cases on Day 1 when it's already overwhelming enough to keep up with everything else in the game.
I am interested in how you react to my scum read though, that's basically my way of sorting you in the meantime. Because as it is now, you didn't really have an opinion on me at all until you were asked to. I think you had me at Null for Pooky's read list request, which implies that my read on you didn't factor much into your own reads for the longest time.
yeah, that wasn't toned, it just feels very noticeable from you and I don't really remember you doing it a bunch on other games.In post 2223, Klick wrote:Not always, only when I'm not really sure what I want.In post 2190, Bellaphant wrote:(I tried to call you!)
Do you always move your vote around this much?
I'd like to know how you're reading BBT's current page content btw.
While it’s true we haven’t played a large together before, I also know that you aren’t like STD who is inconsistent at reading me. What made me so obviously town to you in Schadd’s game and every single other game you’ve played with me that you aren’t seeing here?In post 2203, Roden wrote:I don't have a read on you at all yet, and I didn't mention anything about activity.In post 1769, Dancing Puppets wrote:If this is indeed the case. then this will be the first time Roden hasn’t read me correctly. I pretty much didn’t do jack early in DC either so anyone being suss on either of us for activity reasons can just get wrecked.In post 1577, Off The Hook wrote:this is such a weird post, i cant tell what roden actually believes.In post 1002, Roden wrote:Do you think scum just admits they're going to sheep at the beginning of the game?In post 997, MalcolmTucker wrote:I feel like Dancing Puppets could potentially be scum on the basis of a lot of their recent posts. Feel like there's a lot of stuff about them not necessarily having particularly distinct reads/being willing to sheep despite the fact that they have been quite active anyway. For how much they've posted it feels like there's a real lack of content there.
Granted, I think both heads of the hydra are normally very headstrong about their reads. It's a bit weird to see them both want to take a back seat.
its like hes trying to discrrdit malcolms thoughts, but then he actually says something thats sorta in agreeance with them?
I think I can read (at least) Nancy fairly consistently...in a game half the size of this one. But with this many players I think both heads are just getting drowned out. You two just aren't positioned in the game like you normally would be, and it's harder to get a read on where your heads are at in relation to everyone else when you aren't feasibly going to have the interactions and associations I tend to rely on to figure you out. And I don't think it's because of your decision to hang back a bit this game, the overall game activity is just so overwhelming that it's hard for more than a core few people to maintain a presence.
Tangentially related, finding out that Johnny apparently has 96 posts kinda stunned me. That's honestly way more than I would expect from him for a single Day phase, but he's still registered as "low activity" in my mind because his entire presence is basically him chewing on the end of a piece of straw and being funny every once in a while. His ISO is actually fine when skimming but he's easily getting overshadowed by the dozen bigger personalities at the forefront of the game.
In post 2236, Off The Hook wrote:bluebloodedtoffee is obvscum cmon guys!!
it gives vibes likeIn post 2237, Bellaphant wrote:In post 2236, Off The Hook wrote:bluebloodedtoffee is obvscum cmon guys!!
Do you think bbts response to me is more town or scum? Specifically the climb down.
This feels like it would break site rules tbhIn post 2090, Rad wrote:Pooky before we get near a real flip, I think you should share your doc editing rights with someone you can trust, so we can keep up that spreadsheet in case you're targeted. Cause damn it's so good.
Why are you pushing this so hard? Penguin is a very easy mislim in most games he’s in and you haven’t given a single reason that I can recall why he’s even scum here.In post 2233, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Come on Bella, you want me of all people, to comment on meta?
PEdit - Join the Penguin wagon please.
From bad vote to worse vote. This is town!Dunn here.
In post 1816, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: Penguin is an interesting one for me because as I was reading it felt like everyone and their dog were town reading them and I couldn't understand why. I didn't understand the vote on Bella (133) or the vote on Ceph [170. He says early votes are not serious, OK then, sure we'll go with that.
But then he says that he likes Frog's push back on OTH (283. This seems like it gives him a better reason to vote than his naked vote on Ceph. But he doesn't and as far as I'm caught up to, he still hasn't moved his vote. This probably wouldn't be a problem if the Ceph wagon wasn't the biggest and most prevalent wagon in the game at the time. It just feels like he stays on it much longer than he needs to (for a non-serious early game vote)
Based on what?In post 2243, Dancing Puppets wrote: From bad vote to worse vote. This is town!Dunn here.
Be the change you want to see.In post 2132, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Corwin, talk more about your read on me? In our newbie, you said you came into the game with a lean scum read on me before you replaced in.
Given that, why are you suddenly so paranoid about trying to read me?
I'm down for a Toad wagon as well. Haven't seen much from them in the 20 pages I've read but enough to vote.
Nobody interested in Penguin?
Wow, what an odd conclusion to jump to. I can't quite describe my feeling...but it's like when you see a player post something and you feel they have a guilty mind about it.In post 2162, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why? do you think bella is pocketing me with their latest post?
You’re more than welcome to your bad meta opinion but it’s just not true. Meta is a reliable scumhunting tool in numerous games, as long as it’s decently recent.In post 2244, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 1816, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: Penguin is an interesting one for me because as I was reading it felt like everyone and their dog were town reading them and I couldn't understand why. I didn't understand the vote on Bella (133) or the vote on Ceph [170. He says early votes are not serious, OK then, sure we'll go with that.
But then he says that he likes Frog's push back on OTH (283. This seems like it gives him a better reason to vote than his naked vote on Ceph. But he doesn't and as far as I'm caught up to, he still hasn't moved his vote. This probably wouldn't be a problem if the Ceph wagon wasn't the biggest and most prevalent wagon in the game at the time. It just feels like he stays on it much longer than he needs to (for a non-serious early game vote)
You’re the one naked voting him, why don’t you explain that?In post 2245, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Based on what?In post 2243, Dancing Puppets wrote: From bad vote to worse vote. This is town!Dunn here.