Page 10 of 52
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:02 pm
by Force of Nature
TOWN:
FORCE OF NATURE
IMPLOSION
SLEEPYKREW
PROBTOWN:
FURCOLOW
SODA
GLORB:
RECK
PER
MATTMAN
PINE
SCUM:
GRIMM
YATES
TRIANGLE
WTF:
KONDI2424
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:36 pm
by Pine
What? I never called you an SK. Where'd you get that idea.
Perhaps you got confused by "SK" being an acronym for SleepyKrew.
Soda has done nothing to redeem himself from the original reasons we're voting for him. Why would it die?
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:37 pm
by Pine
And where'd you get Soda=ProbTown from? You had no issue with the wagon on him until recently.
Congratulations, you've completely negated all of your Town points in two posts.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:57 am
by Yates
FoN, if I were scum I'd - well - let you live. You are so bad at this game it would only help the Town.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:19 am
by Pine
^WIFOM
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:30 am
by Force of Nature
In my other game with Pine he randomly speculated about me being an SK.
We then lynched him D1 and he was scum.
I got Soda probtown from a pretty complete reread including ISOs of every single player.
My reads reversing entirely all the time is just what happens when I'm town.
I reread a lot of times until I get really locked in on a read, and then I lynch them.
Yates, when your scumteam bows before the power of llama, you will eat those words.
Aside from Reck and maybe Implosion I probably have the strongest track record of play here anyway.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:18 am
by Yates
I can only go by what I see here - in this game.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:31 am
by Llamarble
That is reasonable.
Just saying by the end of this game you'll have changed your mind.
Or I'll have had a bad game. Could happen.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:31 am
by Force of Nature
That is reasonable.
Just saying by the end of this game you'll have changed your mind.
Or I'll have had a bad game. Could happen.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:41 am
by Force of Nature
Also since I've played so poorly what on the above list do you disagree with?
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:42 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Pine wrote: ↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Why didn't you claim in your first post?
Refusing to read earlier is stupid.
That was his first post, scum. You don't post content in the confirmation stage.
Reading the last 8 pages has been pretty stupid, too, though refusing to read eight pages is a bit silly. I might replace into a 60+ page game and decide to ignore what came before, but 8 pages is a reasonable request.
↑ Pine wrote:Actually, I quite like SK. I mock him because he's playing poorly, and I expect better from him.
Just noticed the dissonance between these two posts: first he calls SK scum, then in the very next post he has a more playful/lighthearted attitude towards SK. He "expects better from him", but thinks he's scum?
Pine just shot up my scumlist.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:48 am
by Yates
↑ Force of Nature wrote:Also since I've played so poorly what on the above list do you disagree with?
There is nothing to "disagree" with as you have been making judgements based on no real information, to the best of my knowledge. Perhaps it's the baseless judgements that give me cause for concern? Fundamentally, the only thing I think I truly disagree with is basing any of your judgements on how a player may have played a previous game. Sometimes a poker player has a tell. Other times, a poker player has a setup "tell" that gets you to go all-in with a full house against a 4 of a kind.
My goal is read a bunch of posts from people I don't know and to figure out truly solid information based on logic and deductive reasoning that will result in a town win.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:48 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Pine wrote: ↑ Yates wrote:Sure didn't take you long to backpedal.
Intriguing.
Who backpedaled? What's contradictory about saying I like SK, but think he's scum and playing unusually poorly?
The way you said it was weird. The order you said it.
↑ Force of Nature wrote:Huh, Grimmjow's pretty scummy.
Weird page one certainty into vote stinginess and general noncomittal attitude / failure to DO things.
Also "I'll lynch Furc if you let me."
Moving on.
You're not good enough to just throw shit out there and say "Moving on" at the end, for what it's worth. Tell me what exactly is scummy about being certain on a read pg. 1 and being careful with your vote? There is literally nothing scummy about that. You're just describing ::things:: and going "they're scummy" without making the necessary middle-steps to get from point A to point B.
Yates wrote:FoN, if I were scum I'd - well - let you live. You are so bad at this game it would only help the Town.
oh my god what the fuck is this
↑ Force of Nature wrote:Aside from Reck and maybe Implosion I probably have the strongest track record of play here anyway.
wait... is this Llamarble? Is he saying this with a straight face?
I should probably make a town/scumlist but all you need to know is that triangle is still the scummiest.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:51 am
by Mattman
Can someone give me a quick synopsis of what has happened yesterday? I had a concert in the bay area and just got back.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:52 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Mattman wrote:Can someone give me a quick synopsis of what has happened yesterday? I had a concert in the bay area and just got back.
uh no it's still D1 you can go read it's only 8 pages
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:52 am
by xRECKONERx
okay 10 pages but there aren't many wall posts so it's a quick read
stop being lazy
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:20 am
by Force of Nature
My judgements are actually very deeply reasoned, thank you very much.
So much so that it would actually be annoying to communicate all of my thoughts while reading. Pattern-matching especially is a pain to communicate.
As I think I've already said, cases are for when I want other people to do things, or just when I have a big chunk of time and feel like it.
Vote stinginess and failure to actually DO anything ARE scummy Reck.
And I remember how you treated Dram in Lovers Multiball.
I'm surprised you don't think of me as an upper-tier player.
I do win all the time (streak is currently at 11 games), so I have to be doing something right.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:24 am
by xRECKONERx
Yes because you winning is definitely all your doing and isn't a team effort.
Dear god man get your fucking head out of your own ass
Vote stinginess isn't scummy -- shouldn't town want to be careful with their votes, whereas scum wouldn't care where it goes? And your "failure to actually do anything" tell could be applied to over half the playerlist.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:50 am
by Force of Nature
Obviously winning 11 games in a row takes luck and good teammates, but it's been quite awhile since I lost a game for my team.
Also I personally did major damage to the scumteam in a solid fraction of them.
You agree my votes in the right place; Grimm's not getting lynched at the moment so let him defend himself.
Make yourself useful and raise more Triangle votes.
I'll be on later.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:01 am
by Force of Nature
Fate would probably tell you I'm good town and bad scum.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:16 am
by SleepyKrew
Appeal To Fate
My favorite scumtell.
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:38 am
by kondi2424
WTF game start
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:39 am
by SleepyKrew
WTF kondipost
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:27 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Yates wrote:Sure didn't take you long to backpedal.
Intriguing.
More triangle votes would be wonderful while i am vla
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:42 am
by SleepyKrew
What does that quote...?