Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:42 pm
@mod: charter is voting for me, and not Parama, because he is Bad at Townie
[Fixed. - spring]
Someone who is Good at Townie: shos
Page 10 of 91
Someone who is Good at Townie: shos
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:03 am
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:04 am
Any anger from Quilford stems from him being scum caught "for the wrong reasons" in his mind. Notice how many times he repeats it's early game, nothing is certain, etc. His responses to additional pressure are equally scum-slanted.
I'll lynch Uberninja too (wasn't it understood that I never, EVER want to play in another game with you?), and firebomb anyone else who wants to stand in the way of my lynch agenda. Policy, scum, and holy retribution are all the same to me D1.
Stickyvote remaining on Quilford, but you can consider me an advocate of the Uberninja wagon. I'll throw my hat onto it or hammer given HALF an opportunity.
I'll lynch Uberninja too (wasn't it understood that I never, EVER want to play in another game with you?), and firebomb anyone else who wants to stand in the way of my lynch agenda. Policy, scum, and holy retribution are all the same to me D1.
Stickyvote remaining on Quilford, but you can consider me an advocate of the Uberninja wagon. I'll throw my hat onto it or hammer given HALF an opportunity.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:07 am
Vi isn't even kind of the lynch today, put your vote somewhere useful.
Scum do NOT often take an immediately post-RVS case and run with it for pages. You might see this behavior in less than one of any twenty mafia games with competent, attentive people. Scum have a tendency to chime in on formed wagons riiiiight about NOW in the gamestate, or lurk behind their RVS vote until there's enough content to compile a case.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:09 am
And Shos is the guy FoSing anyone "bandwagoning." I'll turbolynch that crap off the site too.
Every game is a step closer to a brighter, better MS meta.
Every game is a step closer to a brighter, better MS meta.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:50 am
That's scummy. do not hammer without asking for a claim just for your policy, I don't want to suffer from your earlier games together.!
Nuwen wrote:And Shos is the guy FoSing anyone "bandwagoning." I'll turbolynch that crap off the site too.
Every game is a step closer to a brighter, better MS meta.
is this intention to lynch me because I'm FoSing people for BWing? or you're trying to lynch the BWers as well? I don't understand~
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:24 am
diddin: You've already covered your thoughts on shos.
What about UberNinja's posts makes you feel this way?? (underlined for clarity)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:21 am
Re-reading shos, I don't like how the accusations he has made so far have all spun around himself. Strikes me as OMGUSSy
Shos: who do you currently suspect? Is there anyone who hasn't been all over you you who you find scummy?
Shos: who do you currently suspect? Is there anyone who hasn't been all over you you who you find scummy?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:31 am
First this is ridiculously stupid and you obviously think you're better at mafia than you are
No you see, you're interpreting my actions under the idea that I'm scum, not drawing the conclusion that I'm scum based on my actions. The latter is scumhunting; the former is tunnel vision.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:18 am
Zar, are you scum?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:37 am
whatever I think is scummy, I mention, Zar. so you can go over my posts and see about specifics; so far there haven't been incredible scumslips in my opinion, but only slightly scummy things. Diddin and Uber and Parama are my top three so far. I think the case on quilford isn't quite legit, but I want to see more about how people play here so I'm kinda avoiding stating my thoughts about that.
also, you can see my last post right on top of you for example - what's OMGUSy in my play? O_o
also, you can see my last post right on top of you for example - what's OMGUSy in my play? O_o
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:40 am
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:43 am
it is called RVS. I'll spell it for ya. ARRRR VEEEE ASSS. (lol)
If you really believe that was already out of RVS, I have nothing to say for that~
If you really believe that was already out of RVS, I have nothing to say for that~
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:45 am
It was out of RVS.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:26 am
[/quote]
read them one after the other, do you really think these are legit voting reasons which are out of RVS?
voting cuz Ninjas are dangerous!
voting cuz he called me stupid!
voting cuz I'm not stupid!
voting cuz the theme is interesting!
voting cuz you like someone who called you idiot!
ah and there's your vote, voting because they told me to!
ahh right..obviously we're not in RVS..
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:24 am
tell me then
at exactly which post did RVS end?
at exactly which post did RVS end?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:56 am
Nope.
(Ninja: just go read your ROLE PM closely, you'll notice my name is not listed among your night time buddies. xD)
Okay Parama, please tell me you're not implying that RVS is a well-defined and separate game stage?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:06 am
↑ shos wrote:whatever I think is scummy, I mention, Zar. so you can go over my posts and see about specifics; so far there haven't been incredible scumslips in my opinion, but only slightly scummy things. Diddin and Uber and Parama are my top three so far. I think the case on quilford isn't quite legit, but I want to see more about how people play here so I'm kinda avoiding stating my thoughts about that.
^^ I think this is a genuine response and most like to come from a townie player. So I'm currently leaning townish on shos.
also, you can see my last post right on top of you for example - what's OMGUSy in my play? O_o
What I considered OMGussy of your play comes from me ISOing you. It seemed to me your suspicions on players are focused on those that have either attacked you or voted you.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:32 am
That's like 8-9 players I think... >_>
Parama wrote:tell me then
at exactly which post did RVS end?
I'd answer this like Zar did, but for a change I'll invest some more time in nonsense. let's see. *reads*
In my opinion, the RVS era sort of stopped at post 60.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:45 am
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:34 am
Ok, you get to join me and furcolow as confirmed town
Let's do this
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:51 am
how exactly did I imply that?
you quote a pack of my first few posts; I called them part of the RVS area. these votes were thrown to the air before anything even started happening, and you called them after-RVS posts. How does that imply what you said?
you quote a pack of my first few posts; I called them part of the RVS area. these votes were thrown to the air before anything even started happening, and you called them after-RVS posts. How does that imply what you said?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:21 am
Uberninja, if you're "not nervous", then why did you make a special point of calling yourself town 3 different times on one page of the game?
#1
#2
#3
So he doesn't actually defend himself in any real way, but instead calls himself town three times between 7:55 AM and 9:12 AM in the morning today. In fact, all three of those posts seem to have no point OTHER then for UberNinja to go out of his way to claim to be town.
#1
#2
#3
So he doesn't actually defend himself in any real way, but instead calls himself town three times between 7:55 AM and 9:12 AM in the morning today. In fact, all three of those posts seem to have no point OTHER then for UberNinja to go out of his way to claim to be town.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:34 am
Oh, lol, and he just said it again. Ok, this is #4.
UN's defense plan seems to be to just call himself town over and over again and hope that the rest of us are dumb enough for that kind of repetition to convince us. Of course, this kind of puts the lie to his pretended lack of concern about this wagon; if he wasn't concerned about the wagon, then clearly he wouldn't suddenly be trying so hard to convince us that he's "confirmed town" in response to the wagon.
UN's defense plan seems to be to just call himself town over and over again and hope that the rest of us are dumb enough for that kind of repetition to convince us. Of course, this kind of puts the lie to his pretended lack of concern about this wagon; if he wasn't concerned about the wagon, then clearly he wouldn't suddenly be trying so hard to convince us that he's "confirmed town" in response to the wagon.
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:52 am
Nuwen's posts made me smile.
Except for like everyone she wants to lynch.
And how I apparently misread her post as talking about "competent,
I'd like for one of the many people pretending to know what they're doing to explain why we're not lynching Parama.
Except for like everyone she wants to lynch.
And how I apparently misread her post as talking about "competent,
attractive
people". I'd like for one of the many people pretending to know what they're doing to explain why we're not lynching Parama.