Heroes of Comedy Game Over - He who laughs last!


Forum rules
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #225 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:02 pm

Post by Korlash »

Yates wrote:Even with these posts added, it doesn't change three facts: one, that he admitted to being scum when opening that way; two, "also" is not the same as "but;" and three, he was unable to point to a game where he opened as Town in this fashion. Allowing him three games, it sounds to me like he is saying, "I was scum in those games too" meaning those games in addition to this one. If he meant that he was scum in those games but not this one I would expect him to say "I found Tit for Tat, also, but I was scum in those so no, I can't link to a game where I was Town and opened like that."


See this is easily countered by the fact that midway through the script Ben asks him for a town game and he says "apart from this one" so he obviously wasn't attempting to use 'but'.

Point is, Ben referenced a game (where he was scum? do we have confirmation on this yet? anyone?) and asked for others where he was town. MOI gave him one, but had to admit he was scum in that one (as well as the first game Ben referenced.) Now you can claim this as a 'possible' scum slip due to not being clear however, MOI explained it in his post 72. Take or leave his explination, it all adds up (unless he was town in affc) so calling it a scum slip is outright wrong.

Yates wrote:Here's the thing though, korlash, let's say I adopt your assertion that he just meant in those two games and not this one [due to some inexplicable mistake in grammar], it's still a self incrimination. He stated of his own volition that he was scum in BOTH games in which he opened like this, the logical conclusion being that he can not point to a game in which he was TOWN and opened in a similar fashion [per Benmage's original question]. So he essentially confirmed that this is a scum tell for his meta. If you want to argue that "self incrimination" is different from a "slip," fine. Have at it. You still end up in the same place; with MoI calling himself scum.


No please, argue meta all you want. That's a real and viable attack. It's using a fake one that irks me because it corrupts the thread and damages the game.

For a non-important argumentative stance on this though, I cannot point to a game in which I was town where I argued with you before... Obviously this is a purely ridiculous exaggerated form of what you're saying MOI could be doing here, but it's a clear example of the differences attacking someone for meta reasons and attacking them for scum slips differ. You will not arrive at the same conclusion because the paths taken will be exceedingly different. attacking someone for meta reasons (especially in this game after everything that's happened) has a hell of a lot less chance of 'working out' then attacking them for a scum slip.

So in conclusion, if you adopt my way of thinking you would in turn have to adopt a considerably weaker case against MOI, and there in lies the problem.

Yates wrote:3. Your opinion on MoI doesn't matter to me and bears no value on your inquiries towards me right now. Your opinion on MoI may become important later after a flip. My point was that you were expending a lot of energy on defending tangential points that deflect off of him while not actually defending him or stating your opinion on him. As you know, this is a buddy tell. If you are going to get involved, I'd like to know the reason you feel the need to do it. This directly leads into...


Weird, I've never had anyone dance around whether to accuse me of defensive budding or not before. If you think you can point to my posts and say with a straight face that I seem more concerned with defending MOI instead of being more concerned with attacking what I think is a suspicious action you did, have at it.

Anyway, I felt like getting involved because I saw you pushing weak, fake, and seemingly downright fabricated attacks, ignoring simple questions directed towards you regarding this issue, and being unable to justify said attacks. I originally got involved because I felt I may have seen a contradiction between timing (see my original attacks against you) and quite honestly seriously didn't see the scum slip you mentioned.

Yates wrote:4. Why wouldn't you commit to anything? This game is played based on the content of your posts. Some critical components of that content are interactions with players, opinions expressed, reads, how reads evolve, etc. At least, that's how *I* read players. Making your opinion on a player or a statement known holds you to it. If MoI is lynched and flips Town, I fully expect to have to answer for that. If I just ask random questions without voting or stating opinions while casually casting suspicion and dispersions, how is THAT Town activity. Yes. I am saying that you are casually casting suspicion and dispersions against numerous players [not just myself] without taking a hard line on anything. For me? THAT is a scum tell.


Ah, and there-in lies my point. You have become convinced you need to do something in order to appear town. This is why the 'need to commit' is scum thinking.

Back on point, I'm not for the practice of 'committing' to things just for the sake of taking a stance. I'm more interested in committing to the right stance and damn however people decide to look at me for it. I would hope that my feelings would come out during my play on their own without me having to force them. Now this is hardly ever the case, especially in a game like this, so I'm not against giving my reads when asked but I won't do such just to appease someone.

On a side note, I didn't ask you why should I commit to something, I asked why I should feel the need to do so. Tricky question, sure, but certainly important to see my side of all this.

On that note, Ben originally asked me for my top three scum picks so I think I'm managed enough from all this. in no particular order (alphabetical?) they would be Ben, Pere, and Yates. I would also include Fate.

Ben for his weirdly suspicious rush to defend MOI's use of meta to attack V2V. It didn't make a lot of sense why he would go to such levels to argue with me over it while thinking MOI is scum, although it appears his cause to vote was based on meta so the argument may merely have been about that and not MOI specifically. I'm not convinced as to his alignment but I still rank him as suspicious due to the weirdness of it all.

Pere for his 'intent to hammer' while having never mentioned the case/discussion on MOI all game. That and the whole "give us your reads" things seems like a rather fake and easy way to go about it. i.e. not that easyy for scum to come in, not say a word, and then hammer... but going this route would give him a pretty viable excuse. His defenses of it so far... lackluster and unconvincing.

Yates for the pure and simple fact I feel his vote on MOI is scum oriented. He placed the L-1 vote on MOI for the only stated reason being a 'scum slip' and when asked to explain that flip and justify it, he didn't... In fact it took him all of a page and a half just to explain to me how it was a scum slip. It's easy to tack yourself onto a wagon with a 'reasonably sounding' excuse, but so much harder to defend it when it's fake. I add in the deflection during the inquiry and his exclusion of some of the more important details when 'making his case'.

Fate is scum because Fate is always scum even when the mod mistakenly gives him a town role pm.

On MOI, I believe he has made a few good points in his defense that I feel no need to go into but overall I'm a little iffy. If I had to choose a side I would bet on him being town given the way the wagon formed and the way certain key players have behaved during it all. If it comes down to MOI v. one of my scum reads I would certainly be on the latter wagon, but I would hardly say MOI is a town read of any strength.

The only real town reads I have are the Jester, because while I know he has always been a little disinterested in a game once he's joined it and realized how much he would have to work, I generally feel getting a scum role would have netted a bit more out of him by now just because it's moderately interesting. And V2V because he's cool and I have yet to see him as scum.

Yates wrote:The good news is that Korlash won't be lonely tonight. He found someone in love with his e-peen.


Half the people in this game are in love with that, but I'm always lonely at night it seems... But in all honesty, given the player list if someone is going to sheep one of the big named players... might as well be me, I think that's the safest bet... Just imagine everyone sheeping Fate... or MOI... Oh... the anarchy that would rain down on us...
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Yates
Yates
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Yates
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5119
Joined: October 12, 2011
Location: In your closet. In your head.

Post Post #226 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:05 pm

Post by Yates »

Did you wait for me to post my V/LA?

No. Seriously.
Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #227 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:10 pm

Post by Korlash »

*tilts head to side*

Were you talking to me? I attempted to refrain from asking you any more questions so I didn't have to wait on you while you were gone. Plus I got all I needed anyway. Go Clarice, fly fly fly! All this shall be here when you get back. Hopefully drunk and more libel to 'slip up'...
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
pappums rat
pappums rat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
pappums rat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1544
Joined: November 20, 2010

Post Post #228 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:10 pm

Post by pappums rat »

Yates wrote:Here's the script with everything else blocked out:

Benmage - "Can you name a town game where you opened that way?" [with an RVS vote based on confirmation order]
MoI - "Aside from this one? I have no clue."
Benmage - "If its a common enough occurrence it shouldn't be an issue."
MoI - "It’s not very common at all. In fact the only other occurance I could find was - Open 320: Tit for Tat - I was scum there also"

THAT looks like a slip. I didn't notice it until knox brought it up and I read the posts in sequence [as posted].

PeregrineV wrote:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Benmage wrote: If its a common enough occurrence it shouldn't be an issue. I'd appreciate if you can, I'll ho into more details later tonight.


It’s not very common at all. In fact the only other occurance I could find was -

Open 320: Tit for Tat

I was scum there also
. I gave up looking at the end of page 3 of my egosearch threads list.

--


Yates has a point.

To be fair, MoI has addressed this issue and claimed that he meant he was scum in AFFC,
also
Tit for Tat. I dont believe this is a scum slip.

That said, I still think MoI is flailing obvscum and needs the hammer.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2981
Joined: August 28, 2011
Location: in your bed
Contact:

Post Post #229 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:48 pm

Post by vijay2vasandani »

Lol this kid. XD

When I say too blatant, in your case he outright says "i am scum here too" following your interpretation of what he said. That's why I say it's too blatant. On the other my "weak" scumslip, involves drawing a connection between the flavour etc etc. In other words, whether it's right or not (mine) I see it as a viable slip because scum- MoI wouldn't have realised he was outing himself. On the other hand you expect us to believe that scum-MoI would literally claim scum as a slip? Yeah no, not buying it. Hence I think you are scum purposefully misunderstanding MoI's post. Gets?
coming back after a 3 year break.
User avatar
Fate
Fate
:HAPPY:
User avatar
User avatar
Fate
:HAPPY:
:HAPPY:
Posts: 25827
Joined: January 23, 2010
Location: Eternity

Post Post #230 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:00 pm

Post by Fate »

Was hoping to have this in night for GW: 2 beta week-end. Not going to be checking the forum except when servers are down >_>

Unvote;


Fine, we'll have a 20page+ day. You happy Korlash?
Fate is absurdly beautiful. 運命に弄ばれる
"Fate you keep alternating between narratives of doing it for fun and doing it for the sake of winning"
User avatar
Yates
Yates
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Yates
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5119
Joined: October 12, 2011
Location: In your closet. In your head.

Post Post #231 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:05 pm

Post by Yates »

vijay2vasandani wrote:Hence I think you are scum purposefully misunderstanding MoI's post. Gets?
Gots. You are saying that MoI is too smart to make an accidental mistake but that I am dumb enough to make a decidedly more egregious and obvious error. I will write that down and put it in my pocket so I have something to contemplate on for the rest of the game.

Korlash wrote:Take or leave his explination, it all adds up (unless he was town in affc) so calling it a scum slip is outright wrong.

I disagree. This is where you are arguing semantics. Call it a slip or call it self incrimination, it doesn't matter what you call it. Because...
Korlash wrote:No please, argue meta all you want. That's a real and viable attack. It's using a fake one that irks me because it corrupts the thread and damages the game.

So fine. I'll call it "self-meta" instead of a "slip" so we can all sleep better at night. I still think this is a semantic argument.

Korlash wrote:Weird, I've never had anyone dance around whether to accuse me of defensive budding or not before.
Then you clearly need to learn how to Crump. It is impossible to determine "defensive buddying" until there is a flip. I don't see how this point was unclear. And as to this point...
Korlash wrote:You have become convinced you need to do something in order to appear town.
No. It's not about appearances. It's about substance. I am convinced that you need substantive posts. *I* read fence sitting as scummy. The longer someone fence sits and the more reluctant they are to take hard stands the scummier I find them. YOU may not read people that way but *I* do. Fence sitters are distinguishable from lurker scum mostly due to post count but contribute about the same amount to the game.

People may not agree with my posts or arguments but at least they know what I am thinking and why I'm thinking it [for the most part]. If I get NKed, I like to hope that I may have left a couple pieces of good information out there that might help catch scum. I'm still
relatively
new to this site but that's how we always played mafia elsewhere. I'm adapting but still find it to be good policy.

Korlash wrote:He placed the L-1 vote on MOI for
the only stated reason being a 'scum slip'
Lies! Why did you lie?! Go find the posts that show you are lying!

[feels like bullshit, doesn't it?]

To be fair, I honestly put him at L-1 [post 87] because he dared me to. Also for elusive behavior,
scum slip
self-meta
, OMGUS voting when knox had the AUDACITY to question his "scum too" statement and called her wanting to extend the day scummy [despite the fact HALF the players had 5 or fewer posts]. These are my "stated reasons." [feel free to ISO - mostly in the 70's and 80's] I actually sat there refreshing the screen willing to unvote if he did/said anything nonscummy. But he didn't. Then you became a distraction.

You should also reevaluate your methodology for determining scum after the game if you think putting someone at L-1 is scummy. What happens when he flips scum? Was putting MoI at L-1 scummy then? If he flips Town, I already know I'm going to take a beating for it and draw attention that I would expect scum would want to avoid.

Fun exercise to back up your claim: do you have links showing scum putting Town at L-1 on Day 1? It should be fairly easy if it's scum meta for this site. I just checked my games [short list] and didn't see it in any of them. Thanks for looking into that for me.

And - cheers!
Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in
User avatar
The Jester
The Jester
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
The Jester
Goon
Goon
Posts: 860
Joined: October 2, 2007

Post Post #232 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:12 pm

Post by The Jester »

Motivation to read is at minimal levels. Apologies. So much text decreases it further.

I'd be willing to risk my life hammering MOI. I don't think believe the bomb claim.
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2981
Joined: August 28, 2011
Location: in your bed
Contact:

Post Post #233 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:25 pm

Post by vijay2vasandani »

@ Yates: nope you don't get it. Your right about MoI being too smart to accidentally say "I am scum", but I'm saying you're too smart to think he said that. Therefore you must be scum pretending to misunderstand. If I thought you were town pushing the MoI scumslip which is kinda weak then yes I'd be calling you dumb.
coming back after a 3 year break.
User avatar
Yates
Yates
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Yates
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5119
Joined: October 12, 2011
Location: In your closet. In your head.

Post Post #234 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:29 pm

Post by Yates »

QQ

I was sooo close...
Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in
User avatar
iStark
iStark
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
iStark
Goon
Goon
Posts: 513
Joined: December 10, 2011

Post Post #235 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:43 pm

Post by iStark »

The Jester wrote:Motivation to read is at minimal levels. Apologies. So much text decreases it further.

I'd be willing to risk my life hammering MOI. I don't think believe the bomb claim.


*ouch*

Some one lynch/kill Korlash or I'm never going to catch up to this thread ;-;

*goes back to reading pile of text which isn't making any sense to me*
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2981
Joined: August 28, 2011
Location: in your bed
Contact:

Post Post #236 (ISO) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:53 pm

Post by vijay2vasandani »

Ftr, I don't think MoI ever claimed Bomb.
coming back after a 3 year break.
User avatar
Yates
Yates
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Yates
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5119
Joined: October 12, 2011
Location: In your closet. In your head.

Post Post #237 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:27 am

Post by Yates »

vijay2vasandani wrote:Ftr, I don't think MoI ever claimed Bomb.

FTR, I agree. I think they saw this post as a potential breadcrumb:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:So now I await Benmage's 'non-phone' content and to see whether anyone is
willing to risk their life to mislynch me today
.
rather than pompous posturing. Though, I'm sure korlash will ask me to write a 2 page essay on why I read that as
posturing
and not a
breadcrumb
then ask me what my definition of the word "is" is and dazzle you with how scummy this read is. [Bazinga]

Anyway, I think this argument became moot following this:
MagnaofIllusion wrote:I'm clearly not a Bomb since that is a scum role so who hammers isn't relevant.
Coming soon: 50 Shades of Null
Please pm me to pre-in
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #238 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:34 am

Post by Korlash »

Yates wrote:So fine. I'll call it "self-meta" instead of a "slip" so we can all sleep better at night. I still think this is a semantic argument.


Are you saying that someone 'scum slipping' and someone 'doing something similar to their past scum games' are the same thing?

Yates wrote:No. It's not about appearances. It's about substance. I am convinced that you need substantive posts. *I* read fence sitting as scummy. The longer someone fence sits and the more reluctant they are to take hard stands the scummier I find them. YOU may not read people that way but *I* do. Fence sitters are distinguishable from lurker scum mostly due to post count but contribute about the same amount to the game.


It would be hard to actually argue a case about me being a fence sitter if that what you're getting at, but you would be welcome to try. I may not outright take a hard stance but I don't dance around the issue playing both sides either.

Yates wrote:Lies! Why did you lie?! Go find the posts that show you are lying!

[feels like bullshit, doesn't it?]


Not really. I make sure to know what I'm talking about half the time when I make accusations. So I know this is just exaggerated satire at my expense. I would be careful, some people might think you're flinging untrue accusations to discredit me in some way though...

Yates wrote:To be fair, I honestly put him at L-1 [post 87] because he dared me to. Also for elusive behavior, scum slip self-meta, OMGUS voting when knox had the AUDACITY to question his "scum too" statement and called her wanting to extend the day scummy [despite the fact HALF the players had 5 or fewer posts]. These are my "stated reasons." [feel free to ISO - mostly in the 70's and 80's] I actually sat there refreshing the screen willing to unvote if he did/said anything nonscummy. But he didn't. Then you became a distraction.


Yeah voting because he dared you means nothing to me and the OMGUS thing was in a post outside of your vote post (which is the only thing I was focusing on in my statement). Are you saying you believe he 'scum slipped' but actually were waiting for him to do something that you could unvote? Are you saying you KNOW he is town then?

Yates wrote:You should also reevaluate your methodology for determining scum after the game if you think putting someone at L-1 is scummy. What happens when he flips scum? Was putting MoI at L-1 scummy then? If he flips Town, I already know I'm going to take a beating for it and draw attention that I would expect scum would want to avoid.


I never meant to imply that putting him at L-1 was scummy, merely illustrating how late your vote was on the wagon.

iStark wrote:Some one lynch/kill Korlash or I'm never going to catch up to this thread ;-;


But then you wouldn't have anyone to tell you jokes... ;_;

Yates wrote:rather than pompous posturing. Though, I'm sure korlash will ask me to write a 2 page essay on why I read that as posturing and not a breadcrumb then ask me what my definition of the word "is" is and dazzle you with how scummy this read is. [Bazinga]


In triplicate on legal sized paper with four notaries signing off on it.And we all know the definition of 'is' in this context is an acronym for 'I'm scum' so now I'll have to attack you for a 'scum slip' because that is what all the 'cool' people are doing.
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2981
Joined: August 28, 2011
Location: in your bed
Contact:

Post Post #239 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:10 am

Post by vijay2vasandani »

^ aw shucks Korlash. You didn't have to call me cool.

Are you voting for Yates?
coming back after a 3 year break.
Benmage
Benmage
Survivor
Benmage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 13727
Joined: December 20, 2008

Post Post #240 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:57 am

Post by Benmage »

Hey guys away for the weekend, wont be back till Sunday.
"ITT Benmage is making Shakespeare look cool. I need to bring you to my high school." -Vi
"If i must blantantly follow somone a player cannot do better than blindly following benmage" - tubby216
User avatar
pappums rat
pappums rat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
pappums rat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1544
Joined: November 20, 2010

Post Post #241 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:40 am

Post by pappums rat »

vijay2vasandani wrote:Lol this kid. XD

When I say too blatant, in your case he outright says "i am scum here too" following your interpretation of what he said. That's why I say it's too blatant. On the other my "weak" scumslip, involves drawing a connection between the flavour etc etc. In other words, whether it's right or not (mine) I see it as a viable slip because scum- MoI wouldn't have realised he was outing himself. On the other hand you expect us to believe that scum-MoI would literally claim scum as a slip? Yeah no, not buying it. Hence I think you are scum purposefully misunderstanding MoI's post. Gets?

vijay2vasandani wrote:@ Yates: nope you don't get it. Your right about MoI being too smart to accidentally say "I am scum", but I'm saying you're too smart to think he said that. Therefore you must be scum pretending to misunderstand. If I thought you were town pushing the MoI scumslip which is kinda weak then yes I'd be calling you dumb.

This is a really terrible argument. I have tried to wrap my head around whether town or scum would be more likely to make this kind of a push, and I'm getting more of a misguided town feel, but it took awhile to come to that conclusion.

Also, could you guise ease up on the walls a bit? They are really making this game hard to read.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #242 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:19 am

Post by Korlash »

Walls? WALLS? Please, the Berlin wall is more of a wall then any post in this game... >.> 300 words and a few quote boxes does not a wall make sir...

V2V wrote:^ aw shucks Korlash. You didn't have to call me cool.

Are you voting for Yates?


I only speaks it like I sees it buddy! =DDD

And no, last time i checked I was voting for that no good backstabber that stole my girlfriend, wallet, and car keys on the same night... the scummy bastard...
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
jasonT1981
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9671
Joined: June 15, 2009
Location: Mourne Mountains

Post Post #243 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:26 am

Post by jasonT1981 »

Vote Count coming tonight/tomorrow morning. Just finished 2 back to back weekend shifts... mod is exhausted!
User avatar
jasonT1981
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9671
Joined: June 15, 2009
Location: Mourne Mountains

Post Post #244 (ISO) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:19 pm

Post by jasonT1981 »

Day 1 Vote Count 2


MOI 4 - Pizza, Benmage, pappums rat,Yates
Korlash 2 - Istark, Korlash,
vijay 1 - Shotgun
IStark 1 - Knox
Jester 1 - PeregrineV
Benmage 1 - MOI,
Yates 1 - vijay2vansandani,

Not Voting


The Jester
Fate,

It is now Day 1, with 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch

(expired on 2012-05-15 10:21:52)

till Day 1 Deadline
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
vijay2vasandani
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2981
Joined: August 28, 2011
Location: in your bed
Contact:

Post Post #245 (ISO) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:31 pm

Post by vijay2vasandani »

Korlash why are you voting yourself?
coming back after a 3 year break.
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #246 (ISO) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:14 pm

Post by Korlash »

Because I R suspicious!

I had a flan in the fridge yesterday and today it's gone!... WHO ELSE COULD HAVE STOLDED IT?

On a more serious note, no one has accumulated enough to deserve my vote at the moment (Yates almost had it but at the end the feeling to place it went away). I don't expect it to remain on myself for too much longer, all though I have been known to keep my RVS vote placed on me through day ones before. (usually, I only see this happen in large games though)
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Pizzadudes7
Pizzadudes7
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Pizzadudes7
Goon
Goon
Posts: 978
Joined: September 3, 2011

Post Post #247 (ISO) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:07 pm

Post by Pizzadudes7 »

Why do you RVS yourself? (Just out of curiousity)
Show
I definitely did NOT just lose the game. :)


If someone broke something, blame either gravity or kdowns.

I am simply stating things that may or may not need to be changed through my thorough use of sarcasm, trolling, and all around bitchiness.
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #248 (ISO) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:31 pm

Post by Korlash »

*shrugs* I started doing it a long time ago and now it's just my natural rvs vote.

I suppose it's the all encompassing thing. I get to joke about myself, I get a small measure of self preservation regarding the vote(regardless of alignment), It has the chance of diving into the 'self vote' discussion which can start the game off (sometimes), I don't have to start the game off 'thinking' which is nice, I get to be unique because I'm the only one that tends to do it in most games, I get to type my own name which strokes my ego, and of course I never tend to get voted enough so this keeps my ratio up I suppose...

I could probably go on, but really it's just become something I do in every game (aside form ones I replace into or join late)
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
drmyshotgun
drmyshotgun
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
drmyshotgun
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6838
Joined: January 24, 2012
Location: Far

Post Post #249 (ISO) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:26 pm

Post by drmyshotgun »

Pizzadudes7 wrote:Why do you RVS yourself? (Just out of curiousity)

Is this all you have to say?
My GTKAS!
100% Win Rate in Micro: 10 Games!!
Locked