Mafiascum.net

↑ Huntress wrote:

In post 85, MathGirl277 wrote:
Soooo reads time. It's never too early for reads. It's just that these reads will change over the course of a game. Especially the first readspost. I fully expect every single one of my reads to be completely wrong. Even if the are mostly null.

This feels slightly scummy. As if she's trying to cover herself for later. I get the same feeling from her read of Brandi.

yes, yes, 1000 times yes.

But I disagree with the Sucrose vote. We'll see if that stands when you catch up.

↑ Telo wrote:I don't like post 130 isn't unflattering. It's honest and honesty reads town.

Point.

↑ Huntress wrote:@ Fujiko: Is Eidolon still your top scum read? What did you make of her reply to your post 102?

Eidolon's reply - while I don't really agree with it, it made post 100 make sense to me.

Is she still my top read? No. I've been looking for somewhere else where I'm comfortable putting my vote more than anything.

Piggy's post 213 looks pretty bad to me, honestly. (Although I don't get the seastorm wagon either.) Until then, she looked like someone who was new. (Many of us in this game aren't far behind.) I don't like the scum philosophy bit at all. I was looking at the self-vote as a nervous joke, not a reaction test - as a reaction test, the nervous newish player makes less sense.

VOTE: PiggyGal15

i think piggy is at l-1.

don't rush a lynch. i want time for the less active people to post some more.

I don't think so? She's only gotten three votes that I see since 206, and she had 3 then.

That said, I agree with your point.

↑ camn wrote:
Goof.. what has happened to the game we love?

Don't worry sweet stuff, I got this thing.

↑ Huntress wrote:
@ DrippingGoofball: How are RL excuses a scumtell?

RL excuses is beating the critics to the punch with a pity party The player betrays a lack of confidence in their current and future performance. They come up with unverifiable excuses and sad stories about having no keyboard and whatnot to shield themselves from scrutiny.

It's a scum move alright.

This dayvig doesn't end the day and we still have a lynch.

You can tell us your alignment before the mod comes.

Yeah Dayvigs don't cause Twilight so we can still talk.

I'm vanilla town :/

↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:

Dayvig: Piggy

This dayvig doesn't end the day and we still have a lynch.

@DGB: You do realize that all the possible roles are in the OP and none of them makes a mention of a dayvig? So, unless there's some rule I'm not aware of, this is fake.

VOTE: DrippingGoofball

↑ Fujiko wrote:I don't think so? She's only gotten three votes that I see since 206, and she had 3 then.

That said, I agree with your point.

oh.. for some reason i thought it was 7 to lynch.

anyway, regardless of that whole gambit, i'm still for the most part getting confused newb town vibes from piggy. the reaction kinda supports my idea.

Cityelectric....

Drip,
Do you have a response to 236? Do you know something we do not?

↑ Telo wrote:Drip,
Do you have a response to 236? Do you know something we do not?

this game.

↑ camn wrote:

unvote,
Vote CityElectric

What did I do to deserve this vote?

↑ Eidolon wrote:

↑ Telo wrote:Drip,
Do you have a response to 236? Do you know something we do not?

this game.

wow, that was very clever.

↑ CityElectric wrote:

↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:

Dayvig: Piggy

This dayvig doesn't end the day and we still have a lynch.

@DGB: You do realize that all the possible roles are in the OP and none of them makes a mention of a dayvig? So, unless there's some rule I'm not aware of, this is fake.

VOTE: DrippingGoofball

i'm actually with camn on this. that reaction to the gambit seems really really bad.

To huntress:

So you're basing your read on Spring on your read on Brandi's action?

No, that's not it at all. I was basing my read on srping based on her own reaction to brandi.

@ Eidolon: In a game of eighteen players, do you think that all eighteen need to take a stance on everything/just the major issues, or is it all right for some to look elsewhere? Particularly in view of the fact that who people looked at can be telling later on, after getting some flips.

It's def. okay for people to look elsewhere, but to me, it seemed that what spring chose to focus on was insufficient/grasping. So, a bad read, mixed with that being the only thing she talked about, was odd to me.

Votes or city electric based on her reactin to the dayvig are silly. Look at her start date and reaction to the vote then get back to me.

↑ Tammy wrote:Votes or city electric based on her reactin to the dayvig are silly. Look at her start date and reaction to the vote then get back to me.

Agreed, for the most part. She saw something that was amiss, knew enough about the game to say why, and reacted to it.

I'm not thrilled that she voted on it, instead of asking what was going on, but I don't think it's a scum tell. I'm not surprised she posted what she did at all.

↑ Fujiko wrote:instead of asking what was going on,

I asked and didn't really get an answer.

↑ Telo wrote:

↑ Fujiko wrote:instead of asking what was going on,

I asked and didn't really get an answer.

your question was directed to dgb, so i never answered, but basically it was just for a reaction.

Anyways, hey tammy, it's not just that she didn't understand, but she voted DGB instead of asked about it, and the reasoning for the vote seemed over justified, and a bit awkward.

↑ Telo wrote:

↑ Fujiko wrote:instead of asking what was going on,

I asked and didn't really get an answer.

That was after CityElectric's post, though. Also, you asked instead of just voting DG.