Page 10 of 47

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:00 pm
by FuDuzn
Orc, I am not going to state how I feel about you quite yet.

And I would be willing to do a full claim.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:03 pm
by fferyllt
orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Hey FF, why don't you put your vote somewhere? You've praised some people for aggressiveness, yet you've been maybe the most passive active poster in the game.

I won't be chivvied into voting before I am ready. KBW is where most of my concerns lie at the moment, but I want to read some finished games by other players this weekend. I don't think tying KBW for the lynch lead atm is productive given he's not around until Sunday.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:05 pm
by Klick
FuDuzn, I would like to hear your opinion of Orc before a claim.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:21 pm
by fferyllt
Ms Marangal wrote:Can noone get my name right? :/

sorry. I'll try to do better. I have a cheat sheet of player names, but I don't always remember to double check it. Do you have a preferred abbreviation?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:23 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Another obvious benefit is that instead of trying to find 1 in 11 we get to find 1 in 5. I know the math dont really change, but it gets easier to see all choices, and we can evaluate them more truly when we have all pairings, evaluating everyone singularly is a mistake this game me thinks.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:28 pm
by fferyllt
Svenskt Stål wrote:Another obvious benefit is that instead of trying to find 1 in 11 we get to find 1 in 5. I know the math dont really change, but it gets easier to see all choices, and we can evaluate them more truly when we have all pairings, evaluating everyone singularly is a mistake this game me thinks.

Yeah. this is a clear description of what we gain with the knowledge. And to the extent town players are trying to obscure who their lover is, that effort becomes unnecessary, and should clear up some of the fog that scum currently have to operate in.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:45 pm
by leviathan93
Well, I'm pro claim because i believe scum probably would prefer a claim not to happen. that way suspiciousness comes in to play and people get mis lynched because of it.

Aye!

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:47 pm
by fferyllt
aside from my partner, there are four other players I feel strongly are town. I don't really expect outing our lovers is going to significantly increase my town pile. but, it will still make a huge difference in figuring out which of the 3 remaining pairs I don't want to lynch.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:52 pm
by leviathan93
why wouldn't it significantly increase your town pile? if you only have 4 or five people as town we need that number to be 8. because there are 4 scum and 12 of us total. i honestly think it would do both. I have 4 people I think are town at the moment. apart from me and marangal. which makes 6 town.

i'm wondering if they are either together or their partners are different meaning I don't know what to think of the rest of the people. or if scum is actually IN my town group. i don't think so, but you can't rule out any possibilities. I think the mass claim would help even if it doesn't ultimately solve the problem completely.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
by fferyllt
leviathan93 wrote:why wouldn't it significantly increase your town pile? if you only have 4 or five people as town we need that number to be 8. because there are 4 scum and 12 of us total. i honestly think it would do both. I have 4 people I think are town at the moment. apart from me and marangal. which makes 6 town.

i'm wondering if they are either together or their partners are different meaning I don't know what to think of the rest of the people. or if scum is actually IN my town group. i don't think so, but you can't rule out any possibilities. I think the mass claim would help even if it doesn't ultimately solve the problem completely.

it's because I expect all 4 to paired within that group. In reread a little while ago, I did a self-face-palm over something I think I missed originally.

Anyway. of the remaining six players, some look more townish to me than others. And I'll definitely weigh the opinions of the players I feel really good about regarding how to prioritize.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:11 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Okay well there seems to be no strong objections.

My partner is fferyllt

LIST
Marangal & Levi
Svenskt & fferyllt

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:17 pm
by Klick
That's a town pair.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:38 pm
by fferyllt
Svenskt Stål wrote:Okay well there seems to be no strong objections.

My partner is fferyllt

LIST
Marangal & Levi
Svenskt & fferyllt

confirmed.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:48 pm
by Nekoko
So that means we should out our lover in the next post?

I'm game with that

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:50 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Yeah out your lovers, we will end up with a list of 6 possibilities, something my brain finds much more doable than 11.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:52 pm
by Nekoko
Voodoo Lady

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:00 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Voodoo lady had the same plan as me on page 2, something I find villagery.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:03 pm
by Nekoko
I see you're new here in mafiascum
How many games have you played outside this site?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:05 pm
by Klick
I think Nekoko/VL could be a scum pair.

/dodge

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:06 pm
by Ms Marangal
why are you avoiding claiming a lover Klick?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:07 pm
by Klick
Do you want me to claim my lover now?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:09 pm
by Ms Marangal
I figured that's what we are doing, so why wouldn't you?

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:09 pm
by Ms Marangal
and that means yes

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:10 pm
by fferyllt
Wow.

I think town has this game in the bag.

the Nekoko/VL pair is not the one I am still expecting to see, but it's towny enough that I'm very comfortable voting one of the other 4 that I wasn't as sure of.

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:12 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Nekoko wrote:I see you're new here in mafiascum
How many games have you played outside this site?


About 20 give or take.

Klick wrote:I think Nekoko/VL could be a scum pair.

/dodge


This is not good, it gives us nothing. Give us reasons.