Page 10 of 27
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:28 am
by Sixty
IceGuy (L-3)
~ sword_of_omens, kanyeknowsbest, implosion
Cheery Dog (L-3)
~ Parama, SpyreX, Panzerjager
sword_of_omens (L-5)
~ Maxous
Panzerjager (L-5)
~ Cheery Dog
Not Voting:
IceGuy, Lady Lambdadelta, Messiah
--With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Battery power:
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:53 am
by IceGuy
↑ PJ. wrote: ↑ IceGuy wrote:So, does anybody have any reasoning for their vote on CD?
is this really all you have for us?
Yeah.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:06 am
by PJ.
vig or replacement plz.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:54 am
by IceGuy
Just because you don't agree with my playstyle? Not making up reads like the others?
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:14 am
by implosion
Ignoring things that have been directed at you is not a "playstyle."
It's more like... oh, i don't know, a bad habit. One over which I am absolutely willing to policy vote because categorically not responding to things directed at you makes you more difficult to read than others.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:15 am
by implosion
When i say more difficult to read than others, i mean intrinsically so - as in, you are "cheating the system" and I'm fundamentally unwilling to play a game of mafia with you if you aren't willing to play a game of mafia with me.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:29 am
by IceGuy
I have answered all questions directed at me. Nobody so far has answered the question asked by me.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 4:19 am
by implosion
↑ implosion wrote:Incidentally i'm not sure why i called cheery scum before and am too lazy to check, but his reaction to the LM wagon is bad.
Two other things: i'm not convinced that parama is town (see: the question that i called terrible), and what the hell is Iceguy's post 90? How do you hope that a vote is a fake hammer when the vote is literally in front of you as, you know, a vote?
↑ implosion wrote: ↑ SpyreX wrote:I'm pretttty sure Ice was the hero protecting scum while not looking outside the box
I'd like to hear from the midrange lots more (LLD, implosion, Panzer)
I and my 13 posts really don't like being lumped in with LLD and her 2 posts and Panzer and his 3 posts :\. Even if you don't think I have "done" anything (read: i have) it's still strange, and I find it interesting that I'm the one who hasn't "done" anything as opposed to LLD and Panzer.
Also, Iceguy, respond to 142.
↑ implosion wrote:incidentally, iceguy also still needs to respond to 142.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:32 am
by IceGuy
↑ IceGuy wrote: ↑ Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
Why bother saying "I hope that's a fake hammer" when you can see right in front of your eyes that it isn't"? Why bother with that commentary?
Why not? I wasn't exactly thinking a lot when I made that post.
Already answered.
I also don't see how this is in any way relevant.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:44 am
by implosion
mm. i somehow missed that post.
Unvote
VOTE: Cheery Dog
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:13 pm
by sword_of_omens
sorry guys,
today was busier than i expected (coming back from the holidays and whatnot)
i'll be back at full speed on the morrow....
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:46 pm
by Parama
proddodge
holidays and then break ending, will try to get back to this soon
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:40 pm
by Sixty
Cheery Dog (L-2)
~ Parama, SpyreX, Panzerjager, implosion
IceGuy (L-4)
~ sword_of_omens, kanyeknowsbest,
sword_of_omens (L-5)
~ Maxous
Panzerjager (L-5)
~ Cheery Dog
Not Voting:
IceGuy, Lady Lambdadelta, Messiah
-You ain't nothin' but a hound prod ♪
-Lady Lambdadelta is being prodded...
--With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Battery power:
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:48 pm
by Lady Lambdadelta
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:26 pm
by SpyreX
Guys,
Please dont make me pull out a giant ball of words about this.
IceGuy is being THAT GUY. That doesn't make him scum. He's been far too abrasive about it. He does get a trip to the noose factory but today isn't the time for it. Cheery has way waaay more of a chance of being scum - just go reread the 5 whole pages of D1 and you can feel the wiggling.
I'm all for murderbridge, but lets start wanton slaughter after we have enough of a lead that we're not pissing it away on silly things.
If need be I'll totally unvote and I absolutely 100% promise I wont hammer immediately if Cheery gets to hammertime. Promise.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:27 pm
by PJ.
↑ SpyreX wrote:IceGuy is being THAT GUY. That doesn't make him scum. He's been far too abrasive about it. He does get a trip to the noose factory but today isn't the time for it. Cheery has way waaay more of a chance of being scum - just go reread the 5 whole pages of D1 and you can feel the wiggling.
qft
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:32 pm
by implosion
i copied those two lines and was about to quote them and say "this." Then i saw that panzer already posted. Now i'm sad.
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:14 pm
by Cheery Dog
↑ SpyreX wrote: Cheery has way waaay more of a chance of being scum - just go reread the 5 whole pages of D1 and you can feel the wiggling.
What iceguy has negative chance of being scum?
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:21 pm
by implosion
↑ Cheery Dog wrote: ↑ SpyreX wrote: Cheery has way waaay more of a chance of being scum - just go reread the 5 whole pages of D1 and you can feel the wiggling.
What iceguy has negative chance of being scum?
Sarcastically acting like you're above suspicion does not make you above suspicion
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:27 pm
by Cheery Dog
The only reason I'm suspicious if that I didn't know how to deal with the situation of what at the time was what I thought might be caught scum, but not expecting them to be that easy.
And maybe where my votes have gone today, but other people having town reads based on things I consider possibly scummy mean nothing to me.
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:12 am
by kanyeknowsbest
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:I can see why people have him as a scumread, but I'm not sure if that's the case or not.
I'm not currently reading him as town anyway (still null), so if someone decides he should be an early lynch I'm not going to stop them.
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:The only reason I'm suspicious if that I didn't know how to deal with the situation of what at the time was what I thought might be caught scum, but not expecting them to be that easy.
And maybe where my votes have gone today, but other people having town reads based on things I consider possibly scummy mean nothing to me.
not seeing where you thought he was caught scum.
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:43 am
by sword_of_omens
Alright…
Re-reading Cheery, he did seem to try and ignore the Mhork debacle on D1.
Even to go so far as to drop another RSV on Safety after Safety pointed out Mhork’s exaggeration..
He conveniently had Mhork as “Null” at L-1 until after the hammer, where he graduated to “felt like town made the right decision”
Funny that he almost mirrors iceguy….
I still prefer Ice, but I will settle for Cheery if I can’t get him.
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:28 pm
by Cheery Dog
@kkb, top line of first quote, then because I wasn't expecting him to be caught that easily I didn't follow with actually making him a scum read though I could see why he had the wagon.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:07 am
by Sixty
Cheery Dog (L-2)
~ Parama, SpyreX, Panzerjager, implosion
IceGuy (L-3)
~ sword_of_omens, kanyeknowsbest, Lady Lambdadelta
sword_of_omens (L-5)
~ Maxous
Panzerjager (L-5)
~ Cheery Dog
Not Voting:
IceGuy, Messiah
-You're
The Man now, prod!
-Maxous is being prodded...
--With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Battery power:
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:51 am
by Maxous
↑ PJ. wrote:vig or replacement plz.
Panzer is likely town for this
unless he's scumbuddies with Ice Guy
I beleive lynching Cheery is a mistake but work away if you must, we can lynch implosion afterwards.
Ice guy I dunno. I find it hard to believe after a scum lynch that he literally has no reads, even gut reads. As in his whole 'have no reads' does sound forced?
I would take 'I have a couple of slight reads but i'm not confident in them' as quite more plausible.
On the other hand if Ice Guy is gambiting scum here, it's ridiculously risky, to the point of why the hell would he do it?
Why did'nt LLD follow up her defence of Cheery?