Mafiascum.net

↑ kcudz wrote:Fuzzy, am I scum because I beat around the bush in answering questions?

What?

what if we said yes kcudz?

what if we said

yes

would you start to answer questions directly then?

because damn

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:What?

What was hard to understand about that question?

The reason it came about?

How about: Why am I scum?

↑ Bacde wrote:

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Bacde, stop trolling. What's this about Scott Brosius? I'm not seeing it.

I'm not trolling I'm just having a good time playing mafia

vote Scott Brosius with me and soon enough the confirmation bias will start kicking in and you will see what I'm seeing, he's obvious fake mafia dude

hes so fake

scum

caught scum

Yawn. Come back when you have reasons instead of DUDE HE SO MAFIA HE SO FAKE. Appealing to logical fallacies does entertain me though. Although I'll be more entertained by your eventual snarky/trolly/empty retort.

↑ Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Eh, I can sheep onto scott. VOTE: Scott Brosius

Also antagon, stopping rqs is pro-town, which is not quite the same thing as town.

So why are you sheeping? Since Bacde has not clearly stipulated a reason to vote me, what is yours?

↑ Scott Brosius wrote:

↑ Bacde wrote:

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Bacde, stop trolling. What's this about Scott Brosius? I'm not seeing it.

I'm not trolling I'm just having a good time playing mafia

vote Scott Brosius with me and soon enough the confirmation bias will start kicking in and you will see what I'm seeing, he's obvious fake mafia dude

hes so fake

scum

caught scum

Yawn. Come back when you have reasons instead of DUDE HE SO MAFIA HE SO FAKE. Appealing to logical fallacies does entertain me though. Although I'll be more entertained by your eventual snarky/trolly/empty retort.

Why would my retort necessarily be snarky or trolly?

↑ Scott Brosius wrote:

↑ Bacde wrote:

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Bacde, stop trolling. What's this about Scott Brosius? I'm not seeing it.

I'm not trolling I'm just having a good time playing mafia

vote Scott Brosius with me and soon enough the confirmation bias will start kicking in and you will see what I'm seeing, he's obvious fake mafia dude

hes so fake

scum

caught scum

Yawn. Come back when you have reasons instead of DUDE HE SO MAFIA HE SO FAKE. Appealing to logical fallacies does entertain me though. Although I'll be more entertained by your eventual snarky/trolly/empty retort.

Why would my retort necessarily be snarky or trolly?

↑ kcudz wrote:If we have a vig, the vig should take his choices tonight from here:
Keybladewielder
Siveure DtTrikyp
theslimer3

Why vig lurkers over people you actually find scummy?

↑ Bacde wrote:what if we said yes kcudz?

what if we said

yes

would you start to answer questions directly then?

because damn

LOL!

↑ kcudz wrote:How about: Why am I scum?

@Bacde: Just tell youeself Kcudz is Thor665's alt account and get cozy with that thought. Because this "You can't PROVE I'm scum" is textbook scumtelling for people have that omgusy better-casemaker-than-thou playstyle. And he is suggesting out of absolutely nowhere that we vig lurkers when (1. they can be replaced/pressured to post; 2. Why not vig his freaking scumreads that hes been talking about all game? Hint: he is scum) I don't see why Scott except his push on fuzzy in 57 was kinda forced, but he dropped it after Fuzzy explained it. Also 230/231 look town.

yeah 230/231 do look townie tbh

I'm just not convinced that kcudz is being a scum thor alt

can you call me babe again that was funny

The problem with vigging scum reads over lurkers is that scum reads are all about perspective. Lurkers are more of a universal issue, per say.
You need to be looking at things through a cost-benefit lens. vigging lurkers are helpful to town because:
1) It eliminates a slot that would otherwise be hard to get a read on,
2) allows Town to turn sights on to other, more pressing prospects,
3) doesn't hurt Town as much as a mis-vig would.

Vigging a scum read is often more fallible and although momentarily satisfying, does not always yield a higher benefit. Vigging the lurkers and/or non-contributers is a safe bet.

↑ AngryPidgeon wrote:Because this "You can't PROVE I'm scum" is textbook scumtelling for people have that omgusy better-casemaker-than-thou playstyle.

Where have I insinuated this idea?

yeah cmon angry P why do you gotta harsh our mellow

↑ Bacde wrote:can you call me babe again that was funny

Next time Im drunk

@KCudz: Ok, how is a vig-shot different than a lynch? They are both a kill controlled by the town (although lynch lets someone claim first, sure)

↑ kcudz wrote:

↑ AngryPidgeon wrote:Because this "You can't PROVE I'm scum" is textbook scumtelling for people have that omgusy better-casemaker-than-thou playstyle.

Where have I insinuated this idea?

I quoted it: 229. What is your fuzzy read?

↑ AngryPidgeon wrote:@KCudz: Ok, how is a vig-shot different than a lynch?

The stark (and the most important) difference between a vig-shot and a lynch is that a lynch most definitely requires a majority of Town's consent. It cannot happen otherwise. A vig-shot is ultimately an independent decision.

Post 229 is a line of inquiry. I want to know the reason why Fuzzy thinks I'm scummy because it looks like he's apathetic to any actions I commit further. Another reason I asked what I did in 229 is because Fuzzy has shown no indication of intent to explore any other areas other than me.

I read Fuzzy as scummy. Not particularly as needing of my vote as the FuDuzn slot, or even the baboon slot.

What I remembered to do:
@antagon
So what did you think of Baboon's post about RQS then?

@AP
Do you think Cudz is a thor-alt? If so, why? If not, why mention him?

@Trikyp
Your vote is bad again...

Others might follow after work

↑ PimHel wrote:@AP
Do you think Cudz is a thor-alt? If so, why? If not, why mention him?

No, but I was making a comparison to appeal to Bacde.

It was bad though ._.

Also, @Antagon
If stopping RQS is worth town cred, does that mean you find starting the RQS scummy?

P.S. <3 Bacde

↑ PimHel wrote:@Trikyp
Your vote is bad again...

What am I supposed to do about it?

Seriously??? We get that reaction, while Scott asked in a different post why you're voting him ._.
You should respond to that post.

Ohey, do I need a reason to sheep?

↑ Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Ohey, do I need a reason to sheep?

Of course not.
So if I change my mind about Fuduzn and get players to sheep me to vote you, they don't need a reason as well. That's good to know

So, Kcuddy, what makes me scummy?

I honestly don't see any scum... yet

Except for kcudz














And maybe Angry Pigeon...