Mafiascum.net

NS isn't being dumb... She purposely acts against what she says.

In post 222, don_johnson wrote:wow. skimmed. you idiots have been busy.

When you have contributed to the game, you earn the right to call us names. In the meanwhile, you are the idiot.

In post 209, notscience wrote:Oh, but threats will allow me the gun. And once I have said gun, we'll actually get stuff done rather than have you all chasing a townie.

this mindset is horrible, please never have this mindset

Nacho/Syry, given recent events, who would you shoot?

In post 222, don_johnson wrote:you idiots have been busy.

yeah i have been

In post 222, don_johnson wrote:how many hydras do we have here? and when did this hydra fad start?

you have two to deal with, recently. a lot of town players discovered their power because boy are they powerful.

In post 222, don_johnson wrote:how many successful day 1 lynches have any of you ever seen anyway?

probably a hundred at this point

In post 228, TheIrishPope wrote:Nacho/Syry, given recent events, who would you shoot?

myself.

I see.
Who would you shoot second?

syryana

then i would shoot wisdom

maybe bert

Then shoot Bert now. What's stopping you?

then i'd ask myself why the fuck am i shooting so fast, my plan was fucking fine

What is your plan?
And what stops you from shooting fast? (pun intended)

In post 36, Oil Tycoons wrote:Scum players are smart. I recently sent Syryana an email recently talking about how I would give a player who would make themselves obvtown the gun before giving anyone else the gun, so I'm pretty excited for this game. We're going to troll, focus on meta reads we feel good about attaining, go aggro, go passive, go quiet. Then we'll start shooting.

also the ladies don't like it when i shoot fast, and i live for the ladies

Fun fact is nacho has been in both of my past games - which are both completed now.

In post 112, Kerberos wrote:Nacho, yes Framed

this is still so fucking weird though
assuming you're being framed because i have the gun is just stupid
MOLLIE COME TALK TO ME

In post 239, Bert wrote:Fun fact is nacho has been in both of my past games - which are both completed now.

sorry i felt bad about last game
you got lynched for really stupid reasons

Fine, just shoot before deadline.
Bert! Hey Bert! Bert, hey! Bert! Bert!

In post 241, Oil Tycoons wrote:

In post 239, Bert wrote:Fun fact is nacho has been in both of my past games - which are both completed now.

sorry i felt bad about last game
you got lynched for really stupid reasons

I was being stupid too. I feel free to post this game since there's no pressure of votes.

In post 242, TheIrishPope wrote:Fine, just shoot before deadline.
Bert! Hey Bert! Bert, hey! Bert! Bert!

What

Hi *waves*

In post 199, Wisdom wrote:Between these three, who would you shoot, Bert? Me?

I'd shoot Jacob

In post 226, TheIrishPope wrote:

In post 222, don_johnson wrote:wow. skimmed. you idiots have been busy.

When you have contributed to the game, you earn the right to call us names. In the meanwhile, you are the idiot.

w.
o.
w.
there is really no need for name calling.

anyways. i just gave you a list that could give us up to an 80% chance of hitting scum. i think thats a pretty good contribution.

oil wrote:you have two to deal with, recently. a lot of town players discovered their power because boy are they powerful.

two as in, you and kerb? i take no issue with a confirmed hydra, so that would be one. i see your point. i just find them very difficult to read. of course, i don't read much most of the time anyway. please consider the list i provided. let me know if you have any questions.

p-edit:

Bert wrote:

In post 199, Wisdom wrote:Between these three, who would you shoot, Bert? Me?

I'd shoot Jacob

why?

In post 207, Wisdom wrote:Threatening us won't help you.

Please cut it out with the threats. It's getting old fast.

@Don: Because he's known to lurk, and his last post gives me a bad feeling:

In post 32, JacobSavage wrote: Lol.

Why so keen to pressure me Kerosene?

He does nothing with the post and doesn't refute it or defend himself.

(con't) I mean he doesn't tell us he is going to become more active or give us any reason to believe he's going to change his ways. That's not cool. That's skating by.