Mafiascum.net

I wanted to take my own stance about this specifically too after I read it in the bunch of quotes by funky.

In post 161, Maemuki wrote: the case on me is that I have done nothing all game? Mmmm. Let's think.

1) Most of my posts were fluff. We agree on this one.
2) Most of my posts were during the RVS period.
3) The RVS isn't very known for it's content.

Firstly, that is not the case on you. You HAVE done things. But those were muddying things, irrelevant, and to some point with a tunnel vision. More importantly, when you posted these things, you showed that you are reading the thread, and are active - and all this just emphasizes the lack of content about the actual discussion that has happened.

Now, I don't know about you guys, but some people (I'm looking at you, shos, funky, since you're the other people who are under the most suspicion) are keeping me as a second backup lynch while not actually voting me. (If you're going to accuse me of active lurking, at least make an effort and try to check my posting history. I haven't really posted on the site ever since.)

This is another bad part. What you're doing here is pointing at the other viable lynchees and say, hey guys, look, you should realy lynch them!..which is a logical fallacy; I don't remember its name but, the point of "I am not bad because he is worse" does not make you good. what you said does not apply to me, btw. with funky's latest post showing how he just wants to policylynch you as a lurker, I guess that you are correct about funky, tho. saying that you ahven't posted onsite does not matter at all - since you DID post here. Had you been recieving prods for not posting, I'd have said nothing.

I think that Ellie and Mhork sound... close, so to speak. I don't know if they've played a lot, or if this is just coincidence, but their interactions sound off.

examples? explanations? any better adjectives/adverbs than 'off' and 'close'? please invest some effort here because even if you're lynched, that's info we can use.

In post 60, Lord Mhork wrote:...was it not obvious when I said he was bullshitting reasoning for thinking that funky was town on that one post?

And you only thought of that after funky posted? I find that unlikely. I'm not sure if you didn't understand my question (fine, I didn't use question marks, but the idea was there) or if you didn't want to understand.

Having seen these last 8 pages of content, don't you think it is time to let go of this? I mean, what can mhork possibly say that would help you? you're moving astray again, and this will only promote your lynch.

With nine alive, it takes five to lynch!

Vote Count 1.08:

Lord Mhork (L-5):
Malakittens (L-5):
mastin2 (L-5):
bv310 (L-5):
Maemuki (L-2): elleheathen, Lord Mhork, shos
shos (L-5):
Grimgroove (L-5):
elleheathen (L-5):
funkybike1 (L-3): mastin2, Malakittens

Not voting: bv310, Maemuki, funkybike1, Grimgroove

V/LA:

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-10-19 00:44:01)

... I haven't posted since page 6. Or 7. Really, guys, this sounds like an awfully opportunistic wagon. Also, people obviously don't know the difference between active lurking and just... Lurking. There are 10 pages of content /but I haven't around to read them/.

I swear to God, if I get lynched because you all don't understand that, I'm jumping on to a Paris sewer. I'll read this game tonight, and I hope there is something else to this than 'she hasn't posted since RVS! Lynch her!!!'.

>.>
You're not giving any good feels to me here, Mae. Try posting more and see what happens.

In post 227, Maemuki wrote:I'm jumping on to a Paris sewer.

I'm assuming this is some reference to a Les Miserables character? I don't know enough about it to find out which, but don't think a flavor claim would convince me either way.
Like Mhork said: we need more activity from you. Seriously. I wasn't here for the good first half of this game due to V/LA and I'm already more into this game than you are.

Yeah that looks like a reference to a flavor claim.

VOTE: funky mae's posting giving me gut feeling that I'm doing something wrong. better safe than sorry.

Yeah but flavor claim doesn't prove alignment. It's not really worth unvoting for.

Did I miss who Mae's claiming - because that just looks as opposed to a .

In post 232, Lord Mhork wrote:Yeah but flavor claim doesn't prove alignment. It's not really worth unvoting for.

You don't think our flavor chars will represent good/bad from Les Mis? - Do you think it's random?

I have a hard time believing that.

And for those that don't think it matters, what do you think of a mass flavor name claim at some point?

I say no. Most games can't be broken by a flavor claim and I don't think this one would be any different. I doubt that PA would herp the derp making the thenadiers and Javert and the foreman and all them bad and the rest good. At the very leasthe would definitely give obv bad people obv good fake claims, so I really don't believe that flavorful claim can definitively make her town.

You can make a flavor justification for anyone in les Mis to be either alignment, Elle. I promise. Focus on the fact that Mae is playing like shit and being super scummy.

In post 235, Lord Mhork wrote:Most games can't be broken by a flavor claim and I don't think this one would be any different.

²

Yeah, I seriously doubt name claiming would break this one.

lol I was like what the hell is he talking about then I remembered we had flavor and went on to read my own lol. that is not why I revoted funky, if that post was aimed at me.

@elle: I googled my flavor and no, you are wrong, and mhork is right. my flavor is of a character who is (I think) bad.

Yeah to be honest there are very few completely 'good' or 'evil' characters in Les Mis anyway.

Mala, I could use your help, here.

See...I don't think funky and Mhork are scum together.
funky's posts have been horrible, especially those on last page.

...But Mhork's posts are equally bad, especially the ones on page.

Which do you think is scum? I really can't tell. One moment, I think it's one of them. The next moment, I think it's the other.

Why are my posts horrible, mastin?

In post 241, Lord Mhork wrote:Why are my posts horrible, mastin?

There's literally nothing town in them?

0.o
Right. But Mae is the pinnacle of towniness and good feels, right?

In post 243, Lord Mhork wrote:Mae is the pinnacle of towniness and good feels, right?

Nah, not pinnacle. But pretty dang close. (Well, for good feels, at least. And "good at displaying town-alignment". Not the most pro-town of play, but still a town play.)

Can you point how the 'town' in her posts then?

/prodded

Will catch up tomorrow. Far too tired tonight.

In post 240, mastin2 wrote:Mala, I could use your help, here.

See...I don't think funky and Mhork are scum together.
funky's posts have been horrible, especially those on last page.

...But Mhork's posts are equally bad, especially the ones on

this

page.

Which do you think is scum? I really can't tell. One moment, I think it's one of them. The next moment, I think it's the other.

Gut says Mhork. ;-;

But maybe the wagon says Funky, idk /:

Lately I been double guessing my reads.

With nine alive, it takes five to lynch!

Vote Count 1.09:

Lord Mhork (L-5):
Malakittens (L-5):
mastin2 (L-5):
bv310 (L-5):
Maemuki (L-3): elleheathen, Lord Mhork
shos (L-5):
Grimgroove (L-5):
elleheathen (L-5):
funkybike1 (L-2): mastin2, Malakittens, shos

Not voting: bv310, Maemuki, funkybike1, Grimgroove

V/LA: elleheathen through 10/13

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-10-19 00:44:01)

In post 247, Malakittens wrote:But maybe the wagon says Funky, idk /:

How does that work?