Page 10 of 24

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 4:59 am
by Fart Bane
I lost my scum read on Notsci not entirely but a large amount. I feel this townblocking thing at least now only helps scum. Since we are still in the masses there most likely has to be at least one person on the town block. Meaning they leave themselves untouched well easily knocking off townies. But perhaps everyone NotScience thinks are town really are. Small chance basing that she thinks more then half the people are. I didn't find her idea to be scummy. If she was scum I'd like to think she'd be more cautious. I feel like that was more of a quick idea. Perhaps it made sense at the moment. But what I find kinda weird is that she's holding onto that idea. Maybe theres something were not seeing. Maybe she has some sort of power role. Perhaps she knows one person is or isn't scum... BAUT most likely just an unthought-through idea.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 5:01 am
by Fart Bane
*at least one scum on the town block.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 5:07 am
by Fart Bane
Lets pretend she is a jailer. She jailed _____ and someone died meaning that person isn't scum. (Truthfully I don't know if one scum is jailed the other can kill someone still.
Lets pretend she is a cop. She... copped (?) ______ and she saw that she saw the person was a scum or townie. She would want him on her town block or she would try to lynch him once the town block was formed.
And so on I think you get what I'm trying to say...

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 5:19 am
by notscience
In post 224, Mindgamer wrote:Repeating what you already said doesn't refute my argument. I wouldn't call this townbloc particularly effective either, seeing as no one has accepted your offer. Do you have any scumreads at all so far?
I don't care if they deny it or not, PoE works wonders. The fact that people ARE denying it, showing that skepticism speaks volumes to their alignment.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:09 am
by jmo16mla
In post 221, Fart Bane wrote:
ANYONE WITH THE HEART TO REPLY. WHAT THE PAQ IS TOWNBLOCKING
I already explained this! 217. Or 210.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:14 am
by jmo16mla
In post 227, Fart Bane wrote:Lets pretend she is a jailer. She jailed _____ and someone died meaning that person isn't scum. (Truthfully I don't know if one scum is jailed the other can kill someone still.
Lets pretend she is a cop. She... copped (?) ______ and she saw that she saw the person was a scum or townie. She would want him on her town block or she would try to lynch him once the town block was formed.
And so on I think you get what I'm trying to say...
Please, stop speculating on power roles or what not. That's horribly anti town and you're potentially giving away clues as to who has a PR and who doesnt. Essentially, you're potentially screwing town in the ass.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:26 am
by notscience
In post 230, jmo16mla wrote:
In post 227, Fart Bane wrote:Lets pretend she is a jailer. She jailed _____ and someone died meaning that person isn't scum. (Truthfully I don't know if one scum is jailed the other can kill someone still.
Lets pretend she is a cop. She... copped (?) ______ and she saw that she saw the person was a scum or townie. She would want him on her town block or she would try to lynch him once the town block was formed.
And so on I think you get what I'm trying to say...
Please, stop speculating on power roles or what not. That's horribly anti town and you're potentially giving away clues as to who has a PR and who doesnt. Essentially, you're potentially screwing town in the ass.
And this is why he doesn't get access to the townbloc

With that said

VOTE: FB

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:54 am
by Fart Bane
vote: not science
[b/]


When I was writing this I was defiantly uncertain wether it would be useful or worse. Doesn't that seem a little opertoonist not science? Okay sure I fudged up. Maybe what I said is bad for town but what good would it give me if I was scum? If I got lynched today you would be lynching a town who gave information to scum. Not a scum because I could if shared those thoughts with my partner in the night none of the less. I'm defiantly taking responsibility for this. What I think is that most of the people already thought of thig because you know, this is my second game and all. I don't mean to turn attention but I find Not sciences vote a little too opertoonist.

Ps sorry if half of what I'm saying is spelt wrong or doesn't make sense. I'm using a phone and it's rally hvrr to navagate.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:00 am
by DeasVail
Vote Count 2.02


Fart Bane (2)- Number_0ne, notscience
Number_0ne (2)- Mr. Flay, Mindgamer
jmo16mla (1)- The-Duck

Not Voting: Fart Bane, jmo16mla

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

Deadline


3rd November 4pm AEDT. This is in (expired on 2013-11-03 01:00:00)

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:16 am
by notscience
Why is it opportunistic?

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:29 am
by Fart Bane
Because you've been on my case for awhile and finally I'm under spotlight you vote me and claim, see see thats why he's scum. As I already said what I did was bad okay? Not scummy. No doubt it was a terrible move for town, but jumping on this so fast seems scummy.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 10:24 am
by notscience
And now you're trying to say that because you made a "bad move" it's not scummy.

Doesn't work that way.

You aren't in the townbloc, which means you must be scum.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:32 am
by Mr. Flay
That seems a little reductive, notsci. I don't recall you having an aversion to null reads. Why did you vote him now and not earlier?

I'm gonna be brief today because costume building for Saturday. Oi. Anyway, I don't like the townbloc idea for reasons earlier mentioned. N1's latest posts (219 in particular) have helped reduce my scumread somewhat. I still don't like that my top two scumreads are the voting wagon on Fart Bane the Hapless, so I'm not removing it yet. It really smells like a push for an easy lynch to get us to LyLo.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:33 am
by notscience
In post 237, Mr. Flay wrote:That seems a little reductive, notsci. I don't recall you having an aversion to null reads. Why did you vote him now and not earlier?

I'm gonna be brief today because costume building for Saturday. Oi. Anyway, I don't like the townbloc idea for reasons earlier mentioned. N1's latest posts (219 in particular) have helped reduce my scumread somewhat. I still don't like that my top two scumreads are the voting wagon on Fart Bane the Hapless, so I'm not removing it yet. It really smells like a push for an easy lynch to get us to LyLo.
If it's any consolation, N1 is bussing his buddy for us

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:36 am
by Mr. Flay
OIC. Case?

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:36 am
by Mr. Flay
Why isn't it you bussing your buddy instead?

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:38 am
by notscience
In post 239, Mr. Flay wrote:OIC. Case?
He's not in the townbloc, thus he must be scum
In post 240, Mr. Flay wrote:Why isn't it you bussing your buddy instead?
Because my role PM says I'm town

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 12:55 pm
by Fart Bane
Good answer except not at all. Your avoiding questions with a lame response. Your case on me is because I'm not on your "townbloc" I must be scum. Why am I on your townbloc. As I said multiple times before if I were scum that post I made wouldn't of been in my favor. I would just tell my bud at nightime. So why is your opinion good enough to just say, its because I said so. When everyone disagreed to your idea. And maybe you had a laugh at your second answer but the response either means
a) Your trying to be funny.
b) You think so so strongly that your right.
c) You don't have an answer.

Personally I think its b and c. You need to be less evasive.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:34 pm
by Number_0ne
In post 236, notscience wrote: You aren't in the townbloc, which means you must be scum.
What? Just... what?

I don't get what notscience is doing. He's continually trying to make a townblock in a situation where 1 wrong person would be catastrophic. Furthermore, he's trying to townblock with people who are suspicious of me, yet he goes and makes the exact same vote I did. Fart Bane is scummy. Notscience is being ridiculous.

There are only 2 good reasons why you would be willing to risk a townblock in this case.
1. You firmly believe that the people you are inviting to the townblock are town, and you are willing to risk the game on this.
2. You are scum.


And you say I'm bussing? Me, when you are trying to convince people who are suspicious of me to vote for someone else entirely? If anything, I'd say that notscience is bussing his scumbuddy.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:05 pm
by Mr. Flay
In post 241, notscience wrote:
In post 239, Mr. Flay wrote:OIC. Case?
He's not in the townbloc, thus he must be scum
In post 240, Mr. Flay wrote:Why isn't it you bussing your buddy instead?
Because my role PM says I'm town
So there's 4-6 scum? Because that's how many people aren't in your townbloc, last I checked.

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:29 pm
by notscience
In post 243, Number_0ne wrote:And you say I'm bussing? Me, when you are trying to convince people who are suspicious of me to vote for someone else entirely? If anything, I'd say that notscience is bussing his scumbuddy.
So, I'm bussing my scumbuddy by trying to convince people not to vote you over him?

And no Flay, it has You me mind and jmo

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:33 pm
by Mr. Flay
In post 206, notscience wrote:jmo and flay do you want in the townbloc
This is a request. It's not a declaration. Why are we all Town, anyway?

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:35 pm
by notscience
In post 246, Mr. Flay wrote:
In post 206, notscience wrote:jmo and flay do you want in the townbloc
This is a request. It's not a declaration. Why are we all Town, anyway?
I'm not requesting I'm demanding

Jmo because he could have easily construed your whole quickhammer bit yesterday to be you in a scumlighting and decided you were town

You for the quickhammer bit, I'd expect scum-flay to be a bit more cautious about that

Mindgamer I've already explained somewhere

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:36 pm
by Mr. Flay
That still leaves you with three. What's your stance on The-Duck?

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:37 pm
by Mr. Flay
In fact you've NEVER mentioned The-Duck.