Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:10 pm
I'm willing to work with you provided you can tell your other head to actually reign his shit in a little.
I've been trying to post something civil in reply to this for a good 10 minutes. It's not happening.In post 224, Herself wrote:we are 2 different heads. take a page out of sakura's page and treat us as individuals who share a role and are working together. if it was THAT evident then I wouldn't be asking.In post 222, Street Hassle wrote:...really? Consider that your other head acted like a colossal douchebag towards me yesterday and thenIn post 221, Herself wrote:@ empire
what is with the cold shoulder. I have been good. I have been patient. I was so looking forward to playing with you and so far it has been lackluster. what is your read on us? have you given 1 yet?maybeyou can understand why I've been giving your slot the cold shoulder.
And about my read on you guys: seriously, I'm tired of answering questions whose answers should be evident from my posts.
I am going to level with you. I am tired, I am cranky, I don't feel good and it would be nice to have some light banter and entertainment instead of the shitfests that mafia has turned into these days. do you think you could help with that? that would be nice.
It came off to me like you were blaming us for the game not being fun for you.In post 227, Herself wrote:why do you think he has backed off from you in the first place.
and i do not think I have done anything uncivil to either of you so why would I deserve incivility? I haven't even been uncivil to that squirrel creature even tho she has been baiting me since p1.
you know what. I give up. this was probably 1 the most sincere reach outs I have ever given. have fun I guess
:/In post 228, Street Hassle wrote:It came off to me like you were blaming us for the game not being fun for you.
If I had seen Empire's post I wouldn't have posted mine. I'll take a break for a day or two and you guys can maybe work something out.
Oh, just remembered this.In post 217, Herself wrote:well fitz was scum in this game:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=29543
In post 72, ICEninja wrote:Garmr is looking fairly town, I got embarrassed town vibes from post 63. Fitz giving no content seems like a frustratingly common trend with this guy. Street Hassle dropped a (pretty big, in my eyes) town tell that I don't want to discuss.
The number of town looking players here suggests that there's at least 1 scum in the "hasn't posted yet" camp. I might have to do some lurker hunting this game.
But ice you were the one who started the garmr love why do you deny me and my loving embrace. On a serious note what do you think they are letting me off easy with?In post 194, ICEninja wrote:I'm having a hard time seeing the Garmr love. I'm not scum reading him, per se, but I feel like people are letting him off easy.
whoopsIn [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5456502#p5456502]post 235[/url], pirate mollie wrote:I promise to look at those games tomorrow. to me the biggest thing is that his vote felt perfunctory.In post 233, Street Hassle wrote:Oh, just remembered this.In post 217, Herself wrote:well fitz was scum in this game:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=29543
I see what you're getting at but I think the difference in the catchups might be due to the sheer length of the game (he mentions having to change it up due to it being 40 pages when he jumped in). Need to double check the other games, but in the ones I posted he was either a starting player or had replaced in early.
P-edit: I don't really notice any major tone difference though and he didn't really have a chance to react to his wagon as far as I can see. I don't think you can really use the Castle game as relevant meta given that he was an SK and thus was not really part of the informed minority (e.g., he could have been genuinely scumhunting). Have you had a chance to look at the games I posted? I know you don't really like to go too deep into games you haven't been in personally but worth a shot?
I don't really have much of an opinion on Milked Eek other than I found his preemptive defense suspicious in that it sorta feels likehe's been here this whole time but not really saying anything. I *think* ffery was on the same wavelength as you but we didn't really go over him much, just kinda waiting for more content (doesn't this whole game feel this way at this point?).
Also goddamn it fuck that song it's so fucking bad why do you have to remind me of it? ;_;
wrt: bingo, I thought the same thing but his post doesn't give any indication of this and yet it still reads that way.
and yes, the game feels stagnant that is why this game feels really really off to me. it shouldn't be happening this early.
I think what I do not like is how much time is being eaten up with v/la's and lack of posting. of course people are going to sit around and get paranoid of 1 another but it seems implausible that the whole scum team is lurking it out.
*sniff* radioactive is a really good song (kidding)
wrt the bold: wat pressure we have nut thing as town.In post 234, Garmr wrote:1In post 72, ICEninja wrote:Garmr is looking fairly town, I got embarrassed town vibes from post 63. Fitz giving no content seems like a frustratingly common trend with this guy. Street Hassle dropped a (pretty big, in my eyes) town tell that I don't want to discuss.
The number of town looking players here suggests that there's at least 1 scum in the "hasn't posted yet" camp. I might have to do some lurker hunting this game.But ice you were the one who started the garmr love why do you deny me and my loving embrace. On a serious note what do you think they are letting me off easy with?In post 194, ICEninja wrote:I'm having a hard time seeing the Garmr love. I'm not scum reading him, per se, but I feel like people are letting him off easy.
2.The herself vs street thing looked a little personal glad they sorted it out don't want to dwelve to deep into it.
3. Fitz. Don't see him as town but the initial reason about his reaction to hydras wasn't something I could put my vote on. But the post by herself post 201 does make fitz suspect i would like to see his response. because at the moment his a good day 1 candidate for a lynch
4.Gone nuts for squirrel girl don't like the pressure herself has put on SG side note for latter.
finally where to place my vote at the moment I'm pretty flexible between the fitz and orts wagon.
Why can't I be hesitant town and he be scum that I'm wrongly doubting a read on? Also, is what I did any different than what you did?In post 220, ICEninja wrote:Saying this about your top scum read (or at least who you are currently voting) makes me feel like you're probably the same alignment as fitz. It seems like either you're a townie hesitant to rush too deep in to a mislynch on bad info or (less likely) a scum buddy trying to play down the wagon while still getting credit for being on the wagon.
I'll make a note of this for when we've got a flip on fitz.
Naw, Post 33 was actually pretty townie, surprised you missed it and yeah, I did the meta-reading before I replaced in, wanted to be sure (Still wasn't 100% sure but confident enough) and you've misread that entirely too.In post 242, Street Hassle wrote:Hey your predecessor scumclaimed and we're lynching you, sorry bro ;_;
Can you tell us what you think she meant then. I wouldn't normally ask but you brought it up so........ (Puppy eyes)In post 243, Regfan wrote:Naw, Post 33 was actually pretty townie, surprised you missed it and yeah, I did the meta-reading before I replaced in, wanted to be sure (Still wasn't 100% sure but confident enough) and you've misread that entirely too.In post 242, Street Hassle wrote:Hey your predecessor scumclaimed and we're lynching you, sorry bro ;_;
i tch u how 2 scmhnt?
Alright, I'll go make a pot of tea and then get around to another read through. You going to be up in about an hour to go through it?In post 247, Street Hassle wrote:Massive list of reads is better for me personally.
Pretty sure Banksys just found the phrasing of Streets Post 28 as slightly weird and awkward (Very little motivation to state you have town reads to someone else but not mention who) and wanted an explanation behind it to see if she could understand Streets train of thought. Understood it in Post 33 but didn't agree in town-hunting so much so requested that it stay private in the future (Which is wrong, town hunting > scumhunting tbh).In post 248, Garmr wrote:Can you tell us what you think she meant then. I wouldn't normally ask but you brought it up so........ (Puppy eyes)