Where do you get that from? I haven't dodged any questions.davidangelsummers wrote:but can not understand why Pbug dodges questions.
Mini 326- Buffy Mafia-Game Over
Forum rules
- davidangelsummers
- davidangelsummers
-
davidangelsummers
- It's a Norwegian thing
- It's a Norwegian thing
- Posts: 899
- Joined: January 30, 2005
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
OK.. I'll bite again. What about DAS actions don't you like PbuG?
I can see mass claim helping the current inactive state we find ourselves in but I still feel it's too early. That said I have no other real suggestions. I have found PbuG (taking FOREVER to answer my questions) and Pug (General lurking while giving the impression he is reading the game) suspicious today. I'm happy enough with Adele after I poked around when I first came in but that could always change.
How about everyone post their top two suspicious people and reasons why along with how they feel about a mass claim? As a way to spark some discussion.
I can see mass claim helping the current inactive state we find ourselves in but I still feel it's too early. That said I have no other real suggestions. I have found PbuG (taking FOREVER to answer my questions) and Pug (General lurking while giving the impression he is reading the game) suspicious today. I'm happy enough with Adele after I poked around when I first came in but that could always change.
How about everyone post their top two suspicious people and reasons why along with how they feel about a mass claim? As a way to spark some discussion.
- davidangelsummers
- davidangelsummers
-
davidangelsummers
- It's a Norwegian thing
- It's a Norwegian thing
- Posts: 899
- Joined: January 30, 2005
- davidangelsummers
- davidangelsummers
-
davidangelsummers
- It's a Norwegian thing
- It's a Norwegian thing
- Posts: 899
- Joined: January 30, 2005
- Adele
- Adele
-
Adele
- Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: October 13, 2005
- Location: Not in any Large games, that's for darn sure!
- Contact:
SpamWise wrote:Alright then Sotty.
My top two suspicions: Pug and Lostprophet.
Sotty7 wrote:How about everyone post their top two suspicious peopleand reasons
Just to clarify, I for one amDavidangelsummers wrote:I dont think my role will help that much but if people want to cross me off thier list I will claim. It may get a bit more disscussion going???
against
willy-nilly voluntary claims - the value of the chainclaim is in forcing claims from the more suspicious and less willing at early stages of the claim when they have limited info on what's safe to say.My top two suspicions would likely be
notguilty
for the undercontribution (a really frustrating trait, since it makes him unreadable, which technically should make him least trustworthy, but doesn't make him likeliest to be scum) and Pug89
for, generally, not helping out much. Possibly DAS - I didn't like LostProphet's behaviour, but DAS has been so... willing, I guess, that I instinctually want to cut him some slack for his predecessor's misdeeds.- SpamWise
- SpamWise
-
SpamWise
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 628
- Joined: October 6, 2005
- Location: County Cork, Ireland
Pug: suspicious of him for the way he's stayed in the shadows most game, as well as the reasons I gave earlier.
LP: Just generally suspicious of him. He wasn't giving off good vibes, and he was generally more unhelpful than helpful. His replacement hasn't been scummy, but he hasn't been incredibly pro-town either.
LP: Just generally suspicious of him. He wasn't giving off good vibes, and he was generally more unhelpful than helpful. His replacement hasn't been scummy, but he hasn't been incredibly pro-town either.
"The sky will cover you when you fall down"
davidangelsummers wrote:After reading why Pbug voted for my predecessor and looking at my role I have no real choice but toVOTE PBUG
I would have been FAR more aggressive I assure you.
davidangelsummers wrote:Pbug you picked a player who turns up dead?
How did this person Die?
davidangelsummers wrote:PBuG - Who did you protect on night one?
I have a very good reason for thinking Spike is good but can not understand why Pbug dodges questions.
Those posts all trigger my scumdar. Granted, I have a low-quality scumdar and the pointer tends to get stuck on "Scum", but they still trigger it. Also, granted, three of them are anti-PBuG, but two of those seem like posts meant to indirectly convince people I'm scum.davidangelsummers wrote:I got thrown when sotty asked who you protected on sat...
I am a bit lost what to do now. I thought I would be well in my element ..
rolandofthewhite (5:40:28 PM): It would be weird living with Thesp. All the hookers murdered and skin lying around. :(
- BrizzyBoi
- BrizzyBoi
-
BrizzyBoi
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 492
- Joined: April 14, 2006
- Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Vote: PBug
For speculating on the makeup of the game in post 111 (which got my predecessor in trouble) and for his post 119 wherein he was confused by post 116.
Also I figure that with Willow being confirmed as cop, we probably wouldn't have 2 cops so believe that Spamwise was probably breadcrumbing a mason partner. So I am striking Adele and Spamwise of my radar (at least for now).
"Don't get the impression that you arouse my anger. You see, one can only be angry with those he respects."
Richard M. Nixon
Richard M. Nixon
PBuG: For taking an inordinate amount of time to provide reasoning and I am still suspicious of his claim.
notguilty/BrizzyBoi: When notguilty was speculating on the setup, which I also find suspicious, he didn't include a SK as a role in the game. It seems strange to me that he would fail to include a SK as a role in the game when there were two night kills Night 1. I could be overanalyzing, something about that make me think he may be the SK. I know it's not much; it's just that something about that realy bothers me.
Also, I have band camp all next week so I will probably be unable to post untill the weekend.
notguilty/BrizzyBoi: When notguilty was speculating on the setup, which I also find suspicious, he didn't include a SK as a role in the game. It seems strange to me that he would fail to include a SK as a role in the game when there were two night kills Night 1. I could be overanalyzing, something about that make me think he may be the SK. I know it's not much; it's just that something about that realy bothers me.
Also, I have band camp all next week so I will probably be unable to post untill the weekend.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss Whedon
That is me responding to Adele, who was responding to me thinking it might be lynch-or-lose. That's not scummy.PBuG wrote:Not if we got unlucky with our scum. Although, now that I think about it, we probably have a 2-person mafia and an SK.Adele wrote:Besides, shouldn't a Day 2 LyLo be impossible in a well-constructed mini?
I'm scummy b/c I was confused? WTF?PBuG wrote:I'm considering a vote for Spamwise. He voted Pug, who is away at the moment, and post 116 really confuses me.
rolandofthewhite (5:40:28 PM): It would be weird living with Thesp. All the hookers murdered and skin lying around. :(
- BrizzyBoi
- BrizzyBoi
-
BrizzyBoi
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 492
- Joined: April 14, 2006
- Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
I suppose my word ain't gonna be good enough but since everyone else is speculating... I'd say that since 3 anti town seems about the right number for a game this size, I would be leaning towards either a 2 Mafia & 1SK setup or 3 Mafia with an entheusiastic Vig.Pug89 wrote: notguilty/BrizzyBoi: When notguilty was speculating on the setup, which I also find suspicious, he didn't include a SK as a role in the game. It seems strange to me that he would fail to include a SK as a role in the game when there were two night kills Night 1. I could be overanalyzing, something about that make me think he may be the SK. I know it's not much; it's just that something about that realy bothers me.
My role has me suspecting the second as more likely.
Never said it was scummy, just attempting to make a point about setup speculation and thought that the proposal of a Day 2 Lynch or Lose situation is a good way to put pressure on the town.PBuG wrote:PBuG wrote:Adele wrote:
Besides, shouldn't a Day 2 LyLo be impossible in a well-constructed mini?
Not if we got unlucky with our scum. Although, now that I think about it, we probably have a 2-person mafia and an SK.
That is me responding to Adele, who was responding to me thinking it might be lynch-or-lose. That's not scummy.
- davidangelsummers
- davidangelsummers
-
davidangelsummers
- It's a Norwegian thing
- It's a Norwegian thing
- Posts: 899
- Joined: January 30, 2005
I am more anti Spike then Anti you ...Just being carefull. All my post will be short while im on hol....Sorry ...PBuG wrote:davidangelsummers wrote:After reading why Pbug voted for my predecessor and looking at my role I have no real choice but toVOTE PBUG
I would have been FAR more aggressive I assure you.davidangelsummers wrote:Pbug you picked a player who turns up dead?
How did this person Die?davidangelsummers wrote:PBuG - Who did you protect on night one?
I have a very good reason for thinking Spike is good but can not understand why Pbug dodges questions.Those posts all trigger my scumdar. Granted, I have a low-quality scumdar and the pointer tends to get stuck on "Scum", but they still trigger it. Also, granted, three of them are anti-PBuG, but two of those seem like posts meant to indirectly convince people I'm scum.davidangelsummers wrote:I got thrown when sotty asked who you protected on sat...
I am a bit lost what to do now. I thought I would be well in my element ..