Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:45 pm**

Vote Count 1.9

MafiaSSK(0):

Cabd(0):

Selkies(3):

Cabd, zMuffinman, MafiaSSK

zMuffinMan(3):

Selkies, FourTrouble, Aronis

FourTrouble(0):

King Kenny(0):

The Goodfather(0):

kabooooom(0):

Karlos4(0):

RossWilliam(0):

Aronis(0):

Idiotking(0):

Katsuki(0):

No Lynch(0):

Not Voting(7):

King Kenny, The Goodfather, kabooooom, Karlos4, RossWilliam, Idiotking, Katsuki

With thirteen alive, it takes seven to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2014-02-04 21:00:00)

Non-confirmed players have fourty-eight hours to confirm.

(expired on 2014-01-23 21:00:00)

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:46 pm**

In post 222, Cabd wrote:
In post 219, Selkies wrote:hey cabd you wanna vote muffin now
The tenacity of your read and or push on him is actually giving me confusion and off notes to the tune of "Let's do exactly the opposite of what we did as scum in 1531" so nope. I can't believe I have to tell YOUR HYDRA, of all things, that I'll vote when I'm damn well ready.

mercurial and tenacious. The borkgame was a hell of a hydra 101 class.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:49 pm**

goodfather probs town.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:51 pm**

In post 207, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 203, Aronis wrote:
In post 197, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 187, Aronis wrote:So. . . I'm going to guess MafiaSSK and FourTrouble are town.

So. . .

[VOTE: zMuffin]
So how about you describe your reason?
Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?
Okay so you seem to think that scum is in that group. Why that group in particular? Because they've been the ones that have been most often voted on?

Maybe they've been the most voted on for a reason? They just seem a bit suspicous, that's all.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:52 pm**

selkies wrote:Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.

i only "dropped" one scum read
why do you think i'm more likely to refuse to give reasoning as scum?
and my activity is what my activity is. i'm reading other games, not sitting here f5ing this thread.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:52 pm**

cabd wrote:goodfather probs town

i know why you're saying this but it's not a difficult thing to fake

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:53 pm**

In post 215, Selkies wrote:
In post 209, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 204, Selkies wrote:
In post 196, Cabd wrote:
In post 176, Selkies wrote:People
not named cabd
don't actually get to slap down a scumread on me and then not push that wagon. That's not how this works.
FTFY
It's amazing how often I forget that you're actually a person and not just an annoying bot.

Pedit: Oh, glorious MafiaSSK, "I am known to lurk at times. I am known to be anti-town. I am known for policy lynches. So yeah.", depart unto us more holy advice with which to lynch the wretched scum
Wait, when did I say that?
And why can't my advice be treated as equal here?
It's on your damn wiki page, Mr. "How-Dare-You-Call-Me-An-Easy-Lynch"

I might consider it if you had a smidgeon of reasoning behind it. But it doesn't, much like your vote on me. For, uh, what was it again? Oh right. Nothing.

Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.

Sorry, was busy updating my wiki page. That thing hasn't been updated since I left back in 2010.

It's not nothing.

But yeah. I think you've convinced me for the Muffin wagon.
VOTE: muffin

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:53 pm**

In post 227, Cabd wrote:goodfather probs town.

Maybe so.

What are you thinking about SSK?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:53 pm**

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:54 pm**

In post 228, Aronis wrote:
In post 207, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 203, Aronis wrote:
In post 197, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 187, Aronis wrote:So. . . I'm going to guess MafiaSSK and FourTrouble are town.

So. . .

[VOTE: zMuffin]
So how about you describe your reason?
Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?
Okay so you seem to think that scum is in that group. Why that group in particular? Because they've been the ones that have been most often voted on?
Maybe they've been the most voted on for a reason? They just seem a bit suspicous, that's all.

How do they seem suspicious?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:54 pm**

In post 230, zMuffinMan wrote:
cabd wrote:goodfather probs town
i know why you're saying this but it's not a difficult thing to fake

Then you don't know why I'm saying it.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:56 pm**

In post 233, Cabd wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:56 pm**

In post 236, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 233, Cabd wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis
Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.

Does being new make a player less likely to be scum?

I mean I come form a homesite where the average player age is 14, man. I know a thing or two about newer players.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:57 pm**

In post 232, Selkies wrote:What are you thinking about SSK?

236 killed a light townread for me.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:57 pm**

In post 232, Selkies wrote:
In post 227, Cabd wrote:goodfather probs town.
Maybe so.

What are you thinking about SSK?

Why I place my vote on my knee to the point where it hurts.

But in game wise? I dunno. Cabd's first vote seems so off. I don't like how non-serious it is for a serious vote.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:58 pm**

In post 237, Cabd wrote:
In post 236, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 233, Cabd wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis
Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.
Does being new make a player less likely to be scum?

I mean I come form a homesite where the average player age is 14, man. I know a thing or two about newer players.

A. Are you seriously being an ageist? Stop that shit.
B. No, but it means him not explaining his scumreads isn't a scumtell.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:58 pm**

In post 238, Cabd wrote:
In post 232, Selkies wrote:What are you thinking about SSK?
236 killed a light townread for me.

How so? Because I challenged your read?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:00 pm**

That's not why I voted him.

And if I were ageist, I'd be saying that his age or lack thereof makes him scum. My point was that the younger kids where I play still play like relative noobs so I've developed ways to read players not using classical regular player tells.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:00 pm**

In post 237, Cabd wrote:
In post 236, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 233, Cabd wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis
Give Aronis a break, Cabd. I'm pretty sure they're new.
Does being new make a player less likely to be scum?

I mean I come form a homesite where the average player age is 14, man. I know a thing or two about newer players.

gotta catch em all

if you know what i mean

i mean catching scum

zMuffinMan wrote:
selkies wrote:Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.
i only "dropped" one scum read
why do you think i'm more likely to refuse to give reasoning as scum?
and my activity is what my activity is. i'm reading other games, not sitting here f5ing this thread.

no, you dropped a few reads though

idk man reasoning is sometimes important

also you've avoided me for about 4 pages despite being inthread. what's up with that, scared?

Pedit what the shit is an ageist

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:00 pm**

In post 242, Cabd wrote:That's not why I voted him.

And if I were ageist, I'd be saying that his age or lack thereof makes him scum. My point was that the younger kids where I play still play like relative noobs so I've developed ways to read players not using classical regular player tells.

Then what is it? Explain your might tell.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:01 pm**

In post 241, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 238, Cabd wrote:
In post 232, Selkies wrote:What are you thinking about SSK?
236 killed a light townread for me.
How so? Because I challenged your read?

It wasn't "I think X is town" it was "Give X a pass for this thing you found to be scummy" and it's like stepping into my line of investigation.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:03 pm**

In post 243, Selkies wrote:
Pedit what the shit is an ageist

An ageist is someone who uses someone else's age in a pejorative way.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:04 pm**

It's like there's a shadow-morph in the thread.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:05 pm**

selkies wrote:also you've avoided me for about 4 pages despite being inthread. what's up with that, scared?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:11 pm**

WTF WHERE DID ALL T HESE PAGES COME FROM BUSY SITTING ON VENTRILLO PLAYING A LITTLE DOTA

Mafiascum.net

Mini 1543--Natirasha's On Parole!(Game Over)