Page 10 of 151

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:39 am
by AngryPidgeon
In post 41, mastin2 wrote:
In post 13, RedCoyote wrote:DGB, why would you hydra with someone who was scum last game?

VOTE: SweatingChessball
And why would you assume they're scum again?
FoS: This
In post 14, Aegor wrote:VOTE: dopog

I am scum and trying to push a mislynch.
Okay, you are also town. That said, you're almost certainly right that dopog is a mislynch, soooooo, don't push there.

Vote: sekai no ki.

Because I'm a rebel and Aegor is obviously town. You can random wagon him all you'd like, it's all fun and games and such, but I'd prefer to actually have a random vote that's got a chance of being serious.
While Aegor does seem pretty town so far, I dislike this endorsement.

Mastin I don't think Im willing to call you a scumread yet, but you are par for the course with this wall alone.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:41 am
by AngryPidgeon
In post 44, SweatingChessball3 wrote:mastin2 is scum, he's going to have to NK us.
Ok you can be town.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:43 am
by AngryPidgeon
In post 53, mastin2 wrote:
In post 46, Rubicon wrote:
In post 31, Aegor wrote:VOTE: Aegor
:P
I COUNTERCLAIM

VOTE: Rubicon
This is a legitimate scumclaim, rather than Aegor's faked scumclaim, because it's taking the fun but instead of running with it (voting Aegor), he takes this approach, to avoid drawing attention to himself. Especially since Aegor (having self-voted first) would take the brunt of the blow. It's scum trying to blend in during the RVS, while also trying to avoid becoming part of something they'd rather avoid. (For instance, if Aegor got wagoned to, say, L-1, it'd be something a scum-Rubicon would want to be off of like the plague.)
:igmeou:

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:50 am
by AngryPidgeon
In post 92, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 84, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 82, GuyInFreezer wrote:Also I kinda wanna talk about the mechanics a bit.
When would be the good time to talk about it?
In the dead thread

dayvig:GIF
*gasps for breath*

*slumps down*

*flips town*
Thank god you towntold here I was getting nervous.

Also Molla v Nero was lolz.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:50 am
by ActionDan
In post 223, Nero Cain wrote:Uhhh. But I claim scum all the time. Like frequently. Multiple times per game. And typically only as town.
:igmeou:

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:51 am
by AngryPidgeon
In post 104, Aegor wrote:OMG. You actually employed reasoning to generate a read. I want to reinforce good behavior.
So town.

Innocent Child. not lynch. Ever.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:52 am
by AngryPidgeon
In post 229, ActionDan wrote:
In post 223, Nero Cain wrote:Uhhh. But I claim scum all the time. Like frequently. Multiple times per game. And typically only as town.
:igmeou:
IM NOT NERO CAIN

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:55 am
by ActionDan
Don't you deny it

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:55 am
by Majiffy
Workin a double. Check in tomorrow.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:58 am
by AngryPidgeon
This is supicious
In post 118, mastin2 wrote:Sven's probably scum, because this is the same Sven from Anything Goes.
Its really really not though.
In post 125, vezokpiraka wrote:
vote rubicon

He OMGUSed mastin with only 3 voets on him and still in RVS. That seems like scum over-reacting.
Guys I think the scum are throwing themselves at each other this game, gonna be easy GG autowin.
In post 130, pidgey wrote:whats this shit about AP being the best bird around mastin im the best bird obv
Don't let mastin destroy or masonry. (Im only voting you to distance so when I flip mason-bird scum doesnt figure you out.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:00 pm
by AngryPidgeon
Thor is town. Im locking that read in 5eva. Post 134 was a masterpiece.

This means Thor has at most a day before I call him scum :P

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:05 pm
by AngryPidgeon
In post 152, sekai no ki wrote:A whole lot of moonbeams
Too tryhard; didn't read
In post 157, Zdenek wrote:This post is a scum-claim.

Vote: Rubicon
Town.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:08 pm
by sekai no ki
That's too bad. it could be the longest post I write all game.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:12 pm
by AngryPidgeon
Ok I'm through page 7. Gonna get this down:

Town: Aegor, Thor665, zDenek
Probably Town: Bulbazak, GIF

Im forgetting someone,..

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:14 pm
by BBmolla
*raises hand*

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:21 pm
by Nero Cain
In post 229, ActionDan wrote:
In post 223, Nero Cain wrote:Uhhh. But I claim scum all the time. Like frequently. Multiple times per game. And typically only as town.
:igmeou:
I kinda dislike how he misquoted AP and is claiming that I said this.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:24 pm
by Thor665
In post 212, Rubicon wrote:Chessball is town.

Back at ya.
I don't have a good read on them either way at the moment, but feel that pressure on them and getting people to oppose or support the wagon will be useful to me in reading their alignment and also the alignment of others.

Now it's your turn, why do you think they're town?
In post 213, Toogeloo wrote:Only town has control of the mechanic, so to try and take control of it from those people means you don't trust them and are willing to allow scum to influence their choices.
:neutral:
You are reading the mod's info in the most rose-colored way possible if you believe scum won't be given at least one if not more tools to influence the horde.

Also, last I checked, multiple town players working together tended to have better reads on average - ref: every dead QT ever.
In post 214, ActionDan wrote:so tell me more about how a proclaimed null behavior makes them scum?
I would submit my statement holds just as much solid evidence as his rebuttal to my previous request, and presented it to show as much. What confuses you there?
In post 235, AngryPidgeon wrote:Thor is town. Im locking that read in 5eva. Post 134 was a masterpiece.

This means Thor has at most a day before I call him scum :P
Really? I'll get that long?

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:28 pm
by AngryPidgeon
In post 241, Thor665 wrote:Really? I'll get that long?
Probably longer. Actually maybe I should start waffling on you anyways cause if I dont you'll think Im scum.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:29 pm
by Thor665
That's true.
As I recall it was decently accurate as a tell too.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:32 pm
by Toogeloo
In post 241, Thor665 wrote:You are reading the mod's info in the most rose-colored way possible if you believe scum won't be given at least one if not more tools to influence the horde.
There is no indication what so ever that scum would have any influence.

First off, people with the Horde Mentality have to pick three names. Of these three names, the host randomly ousts two of them. Then he tallies the names up and the one with the most gets killed. It's practically random in and of itself.

Everyone with the Horde Mentality could put "Toogeloo" down as one of their choices, but if I get ousted from every list, I am not dying. It's just too random of a situation to think that scum would have a power to influence it at this stage.

And furthermore, even if you believe that scum have a way to manipulate the horde, why are you condoning actually giving them more information to work with in order to better utilize said ability?

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:39 pm
by Bulbazak
Vote ActionDan

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:42 pm
by Thor665
In post 244, Toogeloo wrote:There is no indication what so ever that scum would have any influence.
Not overtly, I'll agree.
There are *also* no promises that no PRs can effect the results. So...y'know, go read his last zombie game.
In post 244, Toogeloo wrote:And furthermore, even if you believe that scum have a way to manipulate the horde, why are you condoning actually giving them more information to work with in order to better utilize said ability?
What power do you think they will have that will be dependent on knowing the names people are likely to submit?

Also, I know last zombie game, as scum, I was happy that town was so haphazard in how they used the mechanic.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:49 pm
by pidgey
Toog mostly on another site that is mostly super role madness shenanigans (still pretty cool games (sometimes))

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:49 pm
by SweatingChessball3
In post 123, PeregrineV wrote:
Vote: SweatingChessball


Because based on my last 2 games with you both, you probably won't be around tomorrow.

If you somehow are, we may revisit this.
You're scum AGAIN????

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:50 pm
by SweatingChessball3
In post 122, Svenskt Stål wrote:Thats a shitty reason to get a scum read on me
Another one that drew scum, again.