Mafiascum.net

nice try. is that your catchphrase?

ok, mr.expert scum hunter. tell me what I should be doing to scum hunt.

because I thought questioning people I think are scummy was scum hunting?

But thats not what you were doing, you haven't done it for most of the game. You are trying to now but not doing a good job of it and it's a little to late now.

So sorry but you aren't going to convince me to change my vote. Better try to convince others that you are town.

I'm not interested in convincing you, I see you are scum. I've seen it all before, scum have an entrenched position and don't like budging from it. Changing reads is risky and takes effort. I'm sure it will be clear to the others.

Regardless - I am scum hunting - I'm hunting - so whether you like it or not, it is scum hunting. So your position is totally false.

and again 'you are trying to now' - you betray the fact that you know I am town.

and you didn't answer my question.

tell me how one scum hunts. tell me how an expert like you would (if you were town of course...)

But I'm not scum. Your omgus is kinda getting out of hand.

oh you aren't scum? Why didn't you say so. That changes everything. Silly me.

↑ BoroPhil wrote:and you didn't answer my question.

tell me how one scum hunts. tell me how an expert like you would (if you were town of course...)

There's different ways to scumhunt. I'm not going to list all the different ways for someone who's obviously not interested in knowing the answer.

I am, I am, I am, I am, I am. Please please please tell me O expert scum hunter Jake.

I’m borrowing a friend's computer for a bit.

BoroPhil, Please answer my question in post 142,

Honey bee wrote:
Borophil, you ignored me and ypu have no buisness asking for reads when you have been so vague so far..why did you vote jake?

which was referring to your vote in post 92.

And to answer your question in post 204, Prod-dodging is an easy way to delay having to make opinions and votes to which a scum will be held accountable. You were one of my scumreads already, but when you prod dodged, I felt like you wouldn't answer my question, so I voted you again.

TheGottemer, just give me your reads.. I can’t tell if your policy lynching or what.. and if it’s a policy lynch then why is it better than voting scum?

↑ Thesp wrote:
I'm really not keen on Flames682. If he was still around, at this moment he'd be my scond choice for a lynch.

Why? He barely posted anything.
What is your opinion of TheGottemer?

↑ Thesp wrote:

↑ BoroPhil wrote:

↑ Cheery Dog wrote:

↑ BoroPhil wrote:

↑ Thesp wrote:

↑ BoroPhil wrote:I exist.

Why make this post? Do you have

anything

to contribute?

town reaction. genuine frustration.

So why are you frustrated?

me?

I meant Thesp sounded frustrated with me.

That hasn't changed.

I wouldn't shed a tear over a BoroPhil lynch at this point. I'd like to hear from our replacements as soon as they're found, then get a lynch.

So therefore the answer to his question is...?

Avoiding prod. will catch up shortly.

↑ Honey bee wrote:I’m borrowing a friend's computer for a bit.

BoroPhil, Please answer my question in post 142,

Honey bee wrote:
Borophil, you ignored me and ypu have no buisness asking for reads when you have been so vague so far..why did you vote jake?

which was referring to your vote in post 92.

And to answer your question in post 204, Prod-dodging is an easy way to delay having to make opinions and votes to which a scum will be held accountable. You were one of my scumreads already, but when you prod dodged, I felt like you wouldn't answer my question, so I voted you again.

TheGottemer, just give me your reads.. I can’t tell if your policy lynching or what.. and if it’s a policy lynch then why is it better than voting scum?

↑ Thesp wrote:
I'm really not keen on Flames682. If he was still around, at this moment he'd be my scond choice for a lynch.

Why? He barely posted anything.
What is your opinion of TheGottemer?

I voted Jake because of his mutiny post at 78. Again, some scum like to try and lead town and say all of the right things to appear town and I think that's what he was doing here.

I agree with what you say about prod dodging. However, I did deliberately make my post provocative to see what reactions I would get. and I think we got some good ones.

Jake can't make his mind up whether he is voting for me because I am scummy or useless town. That's because there is no scum case against me apart from the fact I was barely posting. and I don't think we are in lynch all lurkers territory yet. so he's using the 'useless town/policy lynch' as a good reason to keep his vote on me. It makes him feel safe.

and I think some people are obsessed with policy lynching. it's an abysmal way of picking someone on day one, especially in a small game. I feel like policy lynching anyone who suggests policy lynching.

oh and Jake - I'm still waiting for that scumhunting masterclass. whenever you are ready mate.

So you admit you are just trying to policy lynch me cause you think I'm trying to policy lynch you. Got it

aha, and now you start the mis-repping.

my god, it's scum by numbers.

↑ BoroPhil wrote:and I think some people are obsessed with policy lynching. it's an abysmal way of picking someone on day one, especially in a small game. I feel like policy lynching anyone who suggests policy lynching.

I'm misrepping you? That's what you just said here. You already accused me of trying to policy lynch you.

↑ BoroPhil wrote:oh, so you aren't policy lynching me. right. sorry, I thought you were because you kept talking about it.

so, why are you voting for me. because iirc you didn't attach any reasons to your vote.

This is where you imply you thought I was policy lynching you. Your sarcasm indicates you still think that.

I said 'I feel like policy lynching', not . You claim to understand sarcasm so let's not play stupid here.

The reasons I'm voting for you are quite clear at 237

and I'm confused now. are you policy lynching me or not? you said you were at 219. Do you know yourself?

and 222 highlights my confusion. I genuinely have no idea why you are voting for me, because as I said your initial vote had no reasons attached?

which was 177

and is quite ironic (do you understand irony?) because at 147 you seem to be calling people out for voting you for no reasons. (even though in my case there was, so there probably was for the others)

You were lying. I also rebuffed your entire case making your reasons to vote me invalid.

Also you categorically disagree?

Your reasons weren't good, some weren't even true and none of them are indicative of a person being scum.
Boro had no reason
TheGotmer had no reason ( outside of he thinks I should have pm'd you my issues which is against the rules.)
Boonskies had no reason either.

So I'm glad you categorically deny it, your denial is 100% false.

↑ BoroPhil wrote:I said 'I feel like policy lynching', not

I AM

. You claim to understand sarcasm so let's not play stupid here.

The reasons I'm voting for you are quite clear at 237

and I'm confused now. are you policy lynching me or not? you said you were at 219. Do you know yourself?

Actually I don't know cause I don't know if you are town or scum. I'm pretty sure you are scum since nothing in your ISO suggests you are town. If you do flip town then obviously it was a policy lynch, and a well deserved one at that.

Your reason in 237 is shit

↑ BoroPhil wrote:and 222 highlights my confusion. I genuinely have no idea why you are voting for me, because as I said your initial vote had no reasons attached?

Yet I've said in multiple posts my reasons for voting you. Yet you keep acting like I haven't.

I could have sworn I had given reasons prior, I just realize I hadn't. But I did give reasons here.

↑ Jake from State Farm wrote:You are being lynched cause you aren't scum hunting and are not being useful. If you are town it's a policy lynch similar to the thing I mentioned earlier that I learned from DDD who was the town IC in a game where I was scum. He said policy lynching under contributing SEs is also a reliable way to lynch scum.

↑ Jake from State Farm wrote:

↑ BoroPhil wrote:but I am scum hunting. I think you are scum. Is that not alllowed?

You aren't scum hunting. Nice try